RK
Full Member
Given the last 6 months of hygiene, is there a risk that populations are more vulnerable than normal to other viruses? Obviously the new measures won't disappear so maybe this is redundant, but the logic is that (for example) kids have built up less of a natural immunity over the last 6 months than they would normally have, so if transmission gets a foothold it could have a more significant impact than normal, in terms of both severity and infectiousness.
Maybe pseudo-science, just curious.
Maybe pseudo-science, just curious.