Scores die in Israeli air strikes

The PLO - like Hamas - bombarded Northern Israel from lebananon.

In 67, Nasser closed the Straits illegally, told the UN to piss off and massed all the Arab armies on Israels borders.

point is, there has been a whole lot of aggression on both sides. Citing just one war and saying 'we were attacked, so we kept some territory in compensation' is fallacious, since there were all those other wars (1956 in particular) where you were the aggressor. And, in this day and age, just because you won the war and seized the land, this does not make that land yours.
 
If someone stole your BMW, then another thief stole it from that thief and then you found it outside Anfield - whose car would it be?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/...ael_palestinians/maps/html/israel_founded.stm

this is the original UN resolution of 1947 for the partition of what is now Israel plus the occupied territories. As you see, both the West Bank and Gaza lie deep in the Arab zone. I do not think you can claim that the BMW was yours originally.

More significantly, there is the armistice line of 1949, an armistice which you yourselves signed. You gave that BMW away and then stole it back!
 
You again seem to believe that the Palestine Arabs were the sole inhabitanats and the invading Jews came out of thin air.

no, I didn't say that. But before the Alliyots started the Jews formed one tenth of the population. Similar ratio to that the Celtic fringe nations would have had of London's population.

Jews have been the longest constant in the region and the Arabs far less so. The british were in charge of palestine - before them the turks. The Arabs got 3/4 of palestine in 1922....its called Jordan.

The question is now how many Palestines do they want?

To people who live on the 1/4 it matters little who gets the 3/4. Especially given that, as you say, Jordanians did not treat them well at all. It is their land, and to have what they perceive to be a foriegn power dominating it is not going to be welcomed. But when people who lived there for years and years were taken over, are partially driven out in 1948 by a minority who suddenly became the power... there is no surprise this caused resentment.

Take Lebanon for an example. If the Armenians say 'we've lived here for the longest, we want to have our own state in Lebanon', there would be a bloodbath, the others would not accept this. Same in Palestine in 1948. I am not saying the Palestinians are right in wanting Israel to go, just that I understand why they feel this way.
 
But doesn't it make you think just why Hamas picked this fight?

I mean - unless they are retards - they clearly calculated and therefore hoped this response?

THat's exactly what I was thinking... and I'm also shocked that Israel played right into this little trap. Either that or they don't care, and are contemplating taking the fight further east, like into Lebanon.

I don't get Hamas, why do they keep attacking Israeli civilians? If they hate their gov't so much, why not orchestrate a terrorist attack on their military targets. Firing random rocket salvos into cities and restaurants isn't exactly going to endear you to the general public.
 
No surprise here from israel. Use a sledgehammer to kill a fly. pathetic as always
 
It was Israel's choice whether to produce this response or a more measured one. They went for an optinon that resulted in 300 deaths. Rockets are bad, by all means, but blockades and bombings from the air are much worse. ..........
I'm curious what you think consists of a measured response, for Israel, who now have an extra 500,000 in harms way, due to Hamas acquiring more long range rockets to hit Israeli cities. Rockets they have smuggled in from across the borders along lines that should be relieving Gaza's supplys of humanitraian and economic aid.
 
THat's exactly what I was thinking... and I'm also shocked that Israel played right into this little trap. Either that or they don't care, and are contemplating taking the fight further east, like into Lebanon.
Truth is they didn't have many other options. Hamas set their trap well, unfortunately..

I don't get Hamas, why do they keep attacking Israeli civilians? If they hate their gov't so much, why not orchestrate a terrorist attack on their military targets. Firing random rocket salvos into cities and restaurants isn't exactly going to endear you to the general public.
You are correct.
 
Israel dont seem to consider the human side of things when involving in such procedures.

Take the Lebanon war a few years ago as an example - Hezbollah capture a few Israeli soldiers, and in response the Israelis completely demolish Beirut.

The same thing has happened now. In striking back against a broken ceasefire, Israelis decide to ruthlessly kill 300.

That's bollox. In 2006 Israel demolished the Dahia quaerter in Beirut, which was a Hizballah stronghold, while life in Christian East Beirut were largely unaffected (we have a couple of Lebanese poters here for further clarifications). Similarly, instead of waving figures regarding the current crisis try to understand that Israel did pretty well in targetting Hamas personnel whereas again the Arab instigators were TARGETTING Israeli civilians.

It's undeerstandable that both sides are emotional in this debate, but if we stick to the facts we can do a better job than just ending up with another CE time travel.
 
But why the 1967 borders? Why not just sit down now and negotiate some new ones with concessions on both sides? Forget what happened over 40 years ago...

That's been tried, and is tried as we speak. The concept of land-exchange has been offered before, and is currently being discussed by Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas. However, judging by the Gaza exercise it's pretty tricky handing any territories to Fatah administration only for their men to be chucked out of windows by Hamas the following week and the territories being used as a front base for Iranian forces.
 
That's bollox. In 2006 Israel demolished the Dahia quaerter in Beirut, which was a Hizballah stronghold, while life in Christian East Beirut were largely unaffected (we have a couple of Lebanese poters here for further clarifications). .

This is true, the Dahie quarter in Beirut was reduced to a very large, dusty, football pitch. But also, most bridges and major roads in the whole of Lebanon were demolished unnecessarily and without no real motives, and the whole of Lebanon is still paying the heavy price of reconstructing those major lines of transportation. (Hizbollah were never going to be using major highways to run away!)

However, the rest of the majorly Muslim dominated quarters of Beirut were not as affected, but still slept in fear of being struck by a missile.

The Christian East Beirut, and the rest of the Christian regions in Lebanon for that matter, had no real idea of what was going on.
 
It's the defiance of a madman who shakes the stick at a tank, or stands in front of one, like that guy in Tiananmen square. You know you will get killed, you know the odds are against you, but you still act because of anger and defiance.

I already asked you - what else did you expect Hamas to do? If you were under years of oppression, if you were going on the back of a crippling blockade, would you just do nothing? If you treat people like dogs then they behave like dogs.

I'm afraid it's not as simple as this. Unfortunately, Hamas adds a religious aspect to the conflict which makes things more complicated, as if the national clash wasn't complicated enough.

As for the dogs analogy, there's one story I wanted to share with you as I suppose what you see/hear on the news are rubble, bodies and figures. Last week there was this Israeli woman from a kibbutz just outside the GS interviewed on the radio. Her kids (11 the oldest) have been sleeping in their parent's bed for months and often refusing to go to school because of the "harmless" rockets falling on their kibbutz regularly. When she said she felt their were let down by the government inability to respond she said that with no real sense of "revenge". She feared for the lives of their Gazan friends (whom they send money monthly), but you have to realise that there are 8 year olds in Southern Israel who don't know what it's like living without a rocket threat. You can't jusge that by number of casualties and measure a "moderate" response. It has to stop.
 
Just because there are Israeli settlements on areas of land does not mean that after negotiation those areas have to be in Israel. The whole point of negotiation is to reach an agreement that is acceptable to both sides.

A good move would be to declare some sort of buffer zone where no development is allowed by either side. And policed by the UN for a certain amount of time. Move people of both sides off the buffer zone and back into their respective territories.

There isn't enough territory for any buffer zone. The "Green Line" is about 10-15 miles from the Med Sea in some areas.

And no UN forces, than you very much.
 
Haniyeh: Hamas willing to accept Palestinian state with 1967 borders
By Amira Hass, Haaretz Correspondent and News Agencies
Tags: Gaza, Israel News, Hamas

The Hamas leader in Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh, said on Saturday his government was willing to accept a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders.

The Hamas leader spoke at a meeting with 11 European parliamentarians who sailed from Cyprus to the Gaza Strip to protest Israel's naval blockade of the territory. Haniyeh told his guests Israel rejected his initiative.

Clare Short, who served in the cabinet of former British prime minister Tony Blair, asked Haniyeh to repeat his offer. He said the Hamas government had agreed to accept a Palestinian state that followed the 1967 borders and to offer Israel a long-term hudna, or truce, if Israel recognized the Palestinians' national rights.

In response to a question about the international community's impression that there are two Palestinian states, Haniyeh said: "We don't have a state, neither in Gaza nor in the West Bank. Gaza is under siege and the West Bank is occupied. What we have in the Gaza Strip is not a state, but rather a regime of an elected government. A Palestinian state will not be created at this time except in the territories of 1967."

The parliamentary delegation was led by Baron Nazir Ahmed, who was born in Pakistan and is a member of the British House of Lords. Ahmed, Britain's second Muslim peer and the only one born Muslim, related how, 10 years ago, he was sworn into the House of Lords using a Koran. "And now you represent us," Haniyeh told him on Saturday.

Ahmed asked Haniyeh about Hamas' relations with Iran and requested his response to the claims of "our Zionist friends" that Hamas, like Iran, seeks to destroy the State of Israel and throw the Jews into the sea.

"Our ties with Iran are like those with other Muslim states. Does a besieged people that is waiting breathlessly for a ship to come from the sea want to throw the Jews into the ocean? Our conflict is not with the Jews, our problem is with the occupation," Haniyeh said.

The protest boat Dignity anchored at Gaza port Saturday morning, carrying nine MPs from Britain and Ireland, one from Switzerland and one from Italy. The parliamentarians sought to express their opposition to the Gaza blockade and see for themselves its effect on Gaza's population. The 11 were among a few dozen members of European parliaments who about two weeks ago were refused entrance to Gaza at the Rafah crossing by Egyptian officials.

This was the Dignity's third voyage from Cyprus to Gaza in 10 days, and the third time in three months the Free Gaza Movement organized a protest sail and visit to Gaza.

The peak of the group's first day in Gaza was their meeting with Haniyeh at his official guesthouse in Gaza City's exclusive Rimal area - formerly the guesthouse of Yasser Arafat. The two-hour meeting was a good-natured affair, at the end of which the parliamentarians noted their host's pleasant manner.

"Your visit proves that the Palestinian people is not alone in its struggle against the blockade and that many of the peoples of the free and cultured world support us," Haniyeh told his guests.

He explained to them why Hamas boycotted the talks with Fatah that were scheduled to begin on Sunday in Cairo. "We had 17 political detainees [from Fatah, held without trial and without being charged] being held in harsh conditions - I'm not proud of that," Haniyeh said. "They were released. We expected a similar measure from our brothers in Ramallah, but unfortunately the situation only worsened ahead of the meeting in Cairo."

According to Haniyeh, about 400 Hamas activists are being held in Palestinian Authority jails in the West Bank, and all requests to release them have fallen on deaf ears.

Haniyeh said that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' statements to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during her visit prove that the United States won't allow the two Palestinian factions to reach a reconciliation. He said the PA must shake off the "American fist" gripping it.

The European politicians took with them a ton of medical supplies and three medical scanners used for spinal injuries, said Arafat Shoukri, 37, a doctor based in Britain.

"We are taking very basic medical supplies like paracetamol and painkillers. We were shocked when we got the list from the Health Ministry in Gaza - it means they don't have anything," Shoukri said.

International aid agencies, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, have said virtually no medical supplies were reaching Gaza

Any word about peace with a neighbouring Jewish state once a Palestinian state is founded along those 1967 borders?
 
But you attacked in 1956 and you attacked Lebanon twice: you cannot say that you were the innocent victims in this.

Also in 1967 you attacked pre-emptively, so it could be argued that you were the aggressors.

Wrong- we were attacked from Lebanon. As for 1967, you know it's a weak one. If not, the naval blockade by Egypt was an act of war according to international law, so there you go...;)
 
no, I didn't say that. But before the Alliyots started the Jews formed one tenth of the population. Similar ratio to that the Celtic fringe nations would have had of London's population.



To people who live on the 1/4 it matters little who gets the 3/4. Especially given that, as you say, Jordanians did not treat them well at all. It is their land, and to have what they perceive to be a foriegn power dominating it is not going to be welcomed. But when people who lived there for years and years were taken over, are partially driven out in 1948 by a minority who suddenly became the power... there is no surprise this caused resentment.

Take Lebanon for an example. If the Armenians say 'we've lived here for the longest, we want to have our own state in Lebanon', there would be a bloodbath, the others would not accept this. Same in Palestine in 1948. I am not saying the Palestinians are right in wanting Israel to go, just that I understand why they feel this way.


The vast majority in Israel see no solution other than a two-state one. The Palestinians are yet to agree to the concept. Mind you, when suggesting that the future border between the two countries would pass west of the Green Line to include more Arabs in the Palestinian state (territory exchange) the Arabs oppose the idea! Moreover, those suggesting this proposal are called racists by the Arabs themselves.
 
I'm curious what you think consists of a measured response, for Israel, who now have an extra 500,000 in harms way, due to Hamas acquiring more long range rockets to hit Israeli cities. Rockets they have smuggled in from across the borders along lines that should be relieving Gaza's supplys of humanitraian and economic aid.

There you go. People are "starving" in Gaza but GRAD missiles are finding their way through despite the "blockade".
 
There you go. People are "starving" in Gaza but GRAD missiles are finding their way through despite the "blockade".

Its a well known documented fact by the United Nations, that the people in Gaza are suffering from the one of the worst living conditions on earth because of this racist blockade. During the six month cease-fire (which Israel broke first in November), medicine, food, clean water, petrol, and electricity are luxuries that they don't have. Lets see your poeple live with that. You should feck off with all your excuses to this attack. The fact is that it has made Israel safer, it will not wipe out Hamas, new people will be joining Hamas everyday. Israel is a less safe place right now, and they knew it from the first place. Blood thirsty murdererous maniacs. You would expect much better from a nation thats been through perhaps worse yet similar conditions.

Shame on you.
 
The vast majority in Israel see no solution other than a two-state one. The Palestinians are yet to agree to the concept. Mind you, when suggesting that the future border between the two countries would pass west of the Green Line to include more Arabs in the Palestinian state (territory exchange) the Arabs oppose the idea! Moreover, those suggesting this proposal are called racists by the Arabs themselves.

Hamas has said it'll agree to a two state solution, so has Fatah, you can drop this bullshit now.
 
The reality is Palestine has been a killing field before the rockets came into existence in the Gaza. There is no guarantee they will live in peace if they stop. Rockets is just another feeble excuse for Israeli aggression.

Gaza has not been handed back. Last time I checked it was still under occupation, caged from all sides.
 
Only Fitzjames in this thread has been spot on.

Both sides need to wise the feck up, stop playing the blame game and using the 'what aboutery.'

This goes for some of the posters on here who just descend into the same old petty debate every time- without an even cursory attempt to understand the other side.

Both Israelis and Palestinians need to let go of their pride and their warped historys and look to themselves for a solution.

If they don't then I don't give a feck- they can blow each other to bits and the world will be a better place for it.
 
So much rubbish is spouted on words by certain stupid leaders regards Arabs wanting to destroy Israel. The FACT on the ground is Israel with their brutal occupation and raids are denying the right of the Palestinians to exist.
 
Only Fitzjames in this thread has been spot on.
Both sides need to wise the feck up, stop playing the blame game and using the 'what aboutery.'

This goes for some of the posters on here who just descend into the same old petty debate every time- without an even cursory attempt to understand the other side.

Both Israelis and Palestinians need to let go of their pride and their warped historys and look to themselves for a solution.

If they don't then I don't give a feck- they can blow each other to bits and the world will be a better place for it.

The man is indeed a genius.
But then he is an old guy who was just 15 when he watched the Six Day War on TV in 1967. literally in black and whilte and with a black in white mindset about plucky little Israel.
The situation is much more complex.
And he has never lived more than 38 miles from Belfast. So the man has probably seen and heard enough "what aboutery" to last several life times.
Probably hes a man who knows that no "solution" in the Middle East is totally perfect but still better than the alternative. And that watching children and grandchildren grow up in a better environment that you dreamed possible...is actually what life is all about.

Took a long time for that notion to take hold in Belfast but for years there had at least been signs that people were getting their heads round that concept. It took a while to sink in that they/we did not actually hate each other as much as they/we thought they/we did.

I get no feeling that this is how people in Israel/Palestine "REALLY" feel.
The hatred there is 100 times worse.
Historical reasons of course that I wont attempt to minimise.

Nevertheless as the frustration of people like Slugger and others shows.......we have lost what interest we had in listening to accusation and counter accusation. That doesnt mean we are not sympathetic to BOTH causes.

But people with agendas presume to tell us that we should only have sympathy for "their" side. How dare we not have 100% sympathy for them. And then the shroud waving starts.
Then the defiant cry that "we DONT need or want your sympathy" but "er could you please support us militarily (Israel) or economically (Palestine)" and could you please send military personnel to support our broader agenda (Afghanistan, Iraq) the so called war on Terror) or allow your civilians to be blown to bits in attacks as we show you our anger" (Palestine and 9/11).

Enough.
If they dont care about their own patch of Earth, theres no pressing need for me or anyone else to do it for them.
 
Vatican's reaction that captures the very essence of evenhandedness: "Hamas is a prisoner to a logic of hate; Israel to a logic of faith in force as the best response to hate."
 
Hamas definitely don't have the interests of the Palestinian people at heart though. From an even remotely utilitarian or practical point of view, if you're sitting next to a big bear, don't keep poking it with a stick. Even if you're sitting in a big pile of shit next to the bear, poking it over and over with a stick will only make things worse.

I personally think Hamas is far more ideologically entrenched in the idea of fighting Israel than it is in working towards a better quality of life for the people it supposedly represents.

Having said that, the hatred they feel is understandable, if not excusable.
 
Vatican's reaction that captures the very essence of evenhandedness: "Hamas is a prisoner to a logic of hate; Israel to a logic of faith in force as the best response to hate."

Thats a pile of shit.

There is nothing logical about this. Human irrationality at its worst.
 

Interesting document. Someone had posted it on the Caf before.
What I disagree with is when it says that “Jimmy Carter and all leftists in the world support the Arab cause”. I would by all means define myself a leftist, but you won’t have me buy into the “Arab lamb, Israeli invader” crap.
But it happens, I admit.
In fact I find it rather stupid that people end up taking part according to their political affiliation, instead of reading and getting an opinion of their own – the usual wordy smokescreen not to see reality for what it is.

Apart from this, and the “who’s right-who’s wrong” debate, when innocent people like you and me lose their lives and have their houses destroyed, it’s a sad sad sad thing.
 
Good point my wedgy friend. I am also very much on the left of the political landscape on most issues...but I don't see why that has to correlate into a totally one sided view of the Israel-Palestine issue.
 
They were democratically elected.

And? Democracy doesn't mean that bad governments can't be elected. Especially if the electorate is ill-informed, uneducated or indoctrinated.

Do you think Hamas' primary objective is to improve the quality of life for the Palestinians? If that is really their number one priority, then they have a very strange way of going about it.
 
No surprise here from israel. Use a sledgehammer to kill a fly. pathetic as always

Reasonable response.

I dont care what anyone tells me, the way it has been, is and will be is this simple equation to the Israelis:

Israeli blood >>>>>>> Palestinian Blood

No matter how you try to rationalize, deny or whatever it is, killing over 300 and critically injuring over 1000 people as a response to a single death is inhumane.

The most tragic aspect of all this is that we've all become immune to these numbers and figures, because thats all it is to most of us. Numbers and figures.

And attacking hamas targets? How is a police graduation ceremony a hamas target? Just toss a rocket in a building and hope a hamas member is one of the 300 people who died?

True, both sides have got to sort things out, but brutally destroying a whole area and taking so many lives in one fell swoop is just out of order.
 
Do you think Hamas' primary objective is to improve the quality of life for the Palestinians? If that is really their number one priority, then they have a very strange way of going about it.

Palestinian suffering has not changed for 60 years despite many government changes. Blaming Hamas for all problems encountered is a public relations exercise.

I do agree lobbing rockets onto your neighbours is not clever, and is hardly going to win you friends, but these rockets are a recent phenomenon. The problems between these neighbours go a long way back.

I can assure you Palestinians are politically very knowledgeable.
 
And? Democracy doesn't mean that bad governments can't be elected. Especially if the electorate is ill-informed, uneducated or indoctrinated.

These are flaws in a democratic system. Majority of people are ill-informed, illiterate and indoctrinated in many democracies.
 
These are flaws in a democratic system. Majority of people are ill-informed, illiterate and indoctrinated in many democracies.

Yep, I couldn't agree more.

Out of interest, have you spent much time in Palestine or Israel Sults?
 
Reasonable response.



Israeli blood >>>>>>> Palestinian Blood

Sadly this is true. Same has been proven in the recent Lebanon war; the destruction of Beiruit in retaliation to the capturing of 3 Israeli soldiers.
 
if some nation came out of thin air and decided to build a state in London (say the Celts or the Italians, citing the Roman Empire)
Mmhhh….. Sounds interesting.... :smirk:


Joking apart, the Jews did NOT come out of thin air to build a state of their own. This is the focal point that people must understand.
Until the general perception even OUT of the Middle East is that they popped out of nowhere shouting “Ours! Ours! Make way!”, there are not many chances that we’ll ever have a serious debate. Actually, it intoxicates any debate.