r0x0rwolfo
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 1,400
Yeah it's odd he didn't play. Wonder what's happened thre.
Well Giggs said he wanted to give everyone a match and Mata was getting the start today and Januzaj the bench spot. I think it is evident he is going to use wingers so could have just been left out since he got the start last week.Any news on the reason for his absence?
Maybe he ate too much after celebrating the player of the month award?
I cannot believe he was dropped. I thought he was excellent last week.
Oh come off it. He wasn't excellent last week. I like Kagawa, a lot but he was average at best last week. Could've done with him today though.
I thought he was good last week. I also think his mobility and movement is important to the team. No idea why he was dropped.
It's Golden Week in Japan this week so he may have been given time to spend with his family.
A bit off topic as it's not related to Shinji's performances but I didn't find a more suitable thread:
Those at United dreaming of a swap with Reus or Hummels this summer or those in Dortmund dreaming of #freeShinji got a serious setback today:
Aki Watzke, our (BVB's) boss, explained in a talk show today that for Shinji to return to Dortmund, there would need to be a vacancy on the no. 10 position*, that this position is well stocked up by Mkhitaryan and Reus, and that therefore, he wouldn't see a return happening.
I know that many will think or say now that things can change, but those who follow Watzke a bit longer will recognize that he's been walking the talk when it comes to players' arrivals and departures (the only exception being Nuri Sahin).
* Watzke also explained that Shinji is clearly a no.10, no winger
I'm with you that it's Shinji who has so far refused to return but I actually don't see how he fits in. If Mkhitaryan were to leave or Reus (in summer 2015), I'd see the point but not now. Aki hadn't mentioned that with Jojic and Hofmann, we have additional players who could play on this position (both in training and in competitive matches), and so far the club's way of finding comparably cheap talent and built them up isn't neglected.To be fair, this statement could be back tracked very easily by a single statement of Klopp seeing Mkhitaryan´s and Reus´ future more on the wings than in the center and thus creating a vacancy.
I personally believe that if we would have the chance of bringing back Kagawa for a reasonable price, we would go for it. It won´t happen, though. I just think that this is more from Kagawa´s side, who will try to realize his dream at United with another chance under a new manager. This statement by Watzke is more about positioning the club´s stance in that matter towards "We never really tried hard to get him, anyway." I´m sure Klopp (who has a history of keeping contact with former players) enquired about him and Kagawa simply declined
Thanks, Sphaero, fun to mingle with the crowd now.Btw, nice to see you up in the Mains, Manni.
Thanks.Good video, MoneyMay!
Oh come off it. He wasn't excellent last week. I like Kagawa, a lot but he was average at best last week. Could've done with him today though.
He has to play every game.. our only player ( other than Mata) who is comfortable with the ball on tight spaces...
4-3-3.. put him as the advanced midfield 3..
Then what do we do with Mata and Rooney
Anybody know Shinji's win, lose, draw stats this stage of the season (and compared to other players like Carrick, Young and Valencia)? These are the stats I tend to like when judging a player's impact on the team...
Came off the bench 4 times in the league. Twice we were winning, 2-0 and 3-0, won both. Twice we were losing 1-0 and 1-0 and we lost both. So he got 6 cheap points there and didn't change anything to pick up points in the other.United.no(the official Norwegian supporter group) likes to occasionally post interesting stats on their front page. They posted this on April 9.
I don't think you need to understand Norwegian to make sense of the list, but in case you can't, it says that Kagawa has "given" us the most points(2.0 on average per game this season). What's worth noticing, is that they include every league game that the player has featured. This means that they also count games you come on as a substitute, to make things easier.
Taking this into account, I find it remarkable that Kagawa has been involved in so many points in the Premier League this season. He's pretty much never come on as a substitue in games we're winning, so he's not been allowed any "cheap points".
Well that's settled then.Came off the bench 4 times in the league. Twice we were winning, 2-0 and 3-0, won both. Twice we were losing 1-0 and 1-0 and we lost both. So he got 6 cheap points there and didn't change anything to pick up points in the other.
Came off the bench 4 times in the league. Twice we were winning, 2-0 and 3-0, won both. Twice we were losing 1-0 and 1-0 and we lost both. So he got 6 cheap points there and didn't change anything to pick up points in the other.
You're also not including City away, Chelsea away. Games against top teams we would have lost anyway.Which games were these?
Feel free to make a list only including games started. I really doubt Kagawa would jump far down the list even then. We still won more games than we lost this season. Being a player who comes on as a sub consistently is gonna be the best, obviously. Kagawa might have gotten 6 cheap points in games he could do very little to change, but did he not also lose 6 points in the other two?
You're also not including City away, Chelsea away. Games against top teams we would have lost anyway.
That's what I meant. Whether or not Kagawa started a game doesn't mean a whole lot. You have to consider the opposition and about 100 other different variables to take any meaning from games won or lost.It doesn't matter if we would have lost the game anyways. Kagawa's average would have been better had he not been used as a sub.
And he didn't come on as a sub vs Chelsea.
Basically this.Why do people use a player's individual record for a season? Are they solely responsible for whether the game was a win or a loss?
Fair enoughThe guy asked for stats... I merely delivered![]()
The guy asked for stats... I merely delivered![]()
I find the EvilKagawa twitter page hilarious to be fair. But my sense of humour can be a tad bit 'simple'.
That's true. Sometimes simple humor is the best.If you can't laugh at simple humor, you've got a stick up your ass and are probably a bit of a douche.