50k more signatures since you posted this.

To put that into perspective, the whole of Kensington and Chelsea had 54k votes in the Referendum.
Well if you want to go down the route of lies, then pretty much every General Election in the last 20 years would be void. Politicians lie to get votes. It's nothing new and it's never going to change.It's a completely pointless petition. But I've signed it anyway.
I'd have thought you'd be better of saying the legality of the referendum was void because of the lies told by the leave campaign. £350 million more to spend on the NHS being the key claim. You can add that because it was so close, it has to be rendered void, but the premise of this one is stupid.
Still, signed.
50k more signatures since you posted this.
To put that into perspective, the whole of Kensington and Chelsea had 54k votes in the Referendum.
Seriously, there is only 1 sentence in this petition and you still can't read it properly.That's not what it says.
It says that any vote that doesn't comprise of 75% of the resgistered electorate is invalid and would have to be called again, not only that, but 60% of those people would have to vote one way or the other or the status quo would remain.
So you would have the minority of the people deciding against the majority by not doing a thing.
It's not 60% of those that bother to vote, or you could have the absurd situation where the future of the county is decided by 10 people.
Ergo, people could hold the county to ransom by never lifting a finger.
To implement it you would have to make it compulsory to vote, which goes against the very idea of democracy itself, as its your right to decide whether you vote or not.
That it was close matters, because if 5% of leave voters would have changed their vote without the leave campaigns lies, the result would have been reversed.Well if you want to go down the route of lies, then pretty much every General Election in the last 20 years would be void. Politicians lie to get votes. It's nothing new and it's never going to change.
Why would the result being close render the result void? If it was a case of 10,000, maybe 20,000 votes, you could argue a recount due to human error and i doubt there would be many people who would challenge you but to argue a result void over 1.3 million votes? Theres no way that there could be human error to that magnitude.
Still democracy states the group with the highest votes wins, and even if you get 1 more vote than your opponent, you win. Of course there would be a recount, but if it all added up, you'd still be the winner.
What if the next referendum matches this same criteria for calling another referendum? Do we just keep going?
So this was the count at 4pm:
1,688,304
Seems to be rising at a rate of a thousand every 30 seconds.
Yes, It quite incredible how these vastly intelligent people seem to think you can just change things as you like if things don't go the way you want.
This is one of those times where its not going to be resolved unless people are prepared to get their hands dirty.
Hardly surprising that people who want to stay in the EU have such a contempt for their own democracy too.
Hardly surprising that people who want to stay in the EU have such a contempt for their own democracy too.
Or maybe they believe in a representative democracy which helps protects against the idiocy of the populace
Only problem with the petitions that i can see is that anyone can sign them. All you have to do is tick a box saying you're a british citizen.1,699,580
5minutes later. Gone up by 11k. Crazy.
Same with the remain campaign, they also told lies, so if 5% of remain voters would have changed their vote without the remain campaign lies, the result would have been extended. Both sides told lies. I don't agree with the £350m figure that the leave campaign threw around. It's was deceiving and i agree it was misleading. It was also like Camerons inferring that Britain leaving the EU would cause World War 3. It would never happen, but he still went ahead with it trying to scare people. Yes i know they're totally different, but it was the way of the campains. Leave tried to point out benefits of leaving, and remain tried their best to scare people into staying.That it was close matters, because if 5% of leave voters would have changed their vote without the leave campaigns lies, the result would have been reversed.
The £350m figure matters, because it wasn't some pie-in-the-sky idea. It was an absolute figure, designed to mislead voters.
We do indeed have rules regarding the campaigning of referendums and general elections. I would hope that the leave campaigns lies fell foul of at least some of the rules the Electoral Commission set out.
Like I said, this petition is pointless, but I have signed it anyway
Iain Watson
Political correspondent
The fact that more than 1.5 million people have signed a petition calling for a second EU petition has attracted a lot of attention - but it has zero chance of being enacted.
The main reason is that it is asking for retrospective legislation - it suggests another referendum is required because the winning side got less than 60% of the vote, and there was less than a 75% turnout.
Now you can have thresholds in referendums.
The 1979 referendum to set up a Scottish parliament failed because a clause was inserted into the legislation requiring more than 40% of all eligible voters - not just those taking part - to agree to devolution before it took place. But that clause came in advance - everyone was clear about the rules. You can't simply invent new hurdles if you are on the losing side.
The other reason is that if a petition gets more than 100,000 signatures it can then - with the agreement of a committee of MPs - be debated in parliament but there is no legal obligation to act on it.
However, there is talk around Westminster- in the wake of a plunging currency and falling share prices - of whether any deal on Brexit negotiated with the EU should then be put to a referendum further down the line.
The UK will remain an EU member for the next two years at least - so it's not over until it's over.
Some would greet this with horror and cries of "foul" - others with relief.
Then they should not have taken part in a referendum when they thought they could win it. You should have petitionned against the referendum when it was announced, not when the outcome disappoints you.Or maybe they believe in a representative democracy which helps protects against the idiocy of the populace
You can't keep having referenda until you get the result you want. If the next referendum is a 'remain', will there be a third referendum for the ones who want an exit? And you expect the other EU member states to wait until the country is tired of referenda and finally the last one counts?Nothing undemocratic about it. If enough people signed it, another referendum happened and the result changed, that'd be democracy. Sounds like you're the one holding democracy in contempt to me.
Only problem with the petitions that i can see is that anyone can sign them. All you have to do is tick a box saying you're a british citizen.
There could be people from France, Germany, Poland even Australia and the USA signing them.
this just been posted on bbc news feed:
Posted this in the Brexit thread too.
How To Deliver A Second Referendum:
https://waitingfortax.com/2016/06/24/when-i-say-no-i-mean-maybe/
I saw yesterday at one point over 20k of votes were removed. I guess they collect your IP and check if you are really in UK.Well you have to put an address as well. To be fair, that's not exactly hard to fake.
Anyway, gone up 73k signatures in 30minutes.
I saw yesterday at one point over 20k of votes were removed. I guess they collect your IP and check if you are really in UK.
Hardly surprising that people who want to stay in the EU have such a contempt for their own democracy too.
This is why I hope we get Boris as PM. He suggested doing this. EU-Lite would be perfect.Posted this in the Brexit thread too.
How To Deliver A Second Referendum:
https://waitingfortax.com/2016/06/24/when-i-say-no-i-mean-maybe/
Boris Johnson said:There is only one way to get the change we need, and that is to vote to go, because all EU history shows that they only really listen to a population when it says No.
Nigel Farage said:“In a 52-48 referendum this would be unfinished business by a long way. If the remain campaign win two-thirds to one-third that ends it.”
But, Boris is a bit of a dreamer. He was a dreamer when he put his support behind a Thames Estuary Airport, he was a dreamer when he took part in a live charity football match (would David Cameron ever do that?), he was a dreamer when he suggest building a bridge with shops and people living on it, he was a dreamer when he suggested a floating park (seriously, what is it with Boris and ideas of things on the Thames). He was a dreamer when he suggested a bicycle path in the sky, and so on.But he told the Times (paywall) on Saturday that he was not in favour of using a popular rejection of EU membership as leverage to secure further reforms and concessions from Brussels. “Out is out,” he said. “What I want is to get out and then negotiate a series of trade arrangements around the world.” Asked if he was ruling out a second vote, he said: “I don’t think it would be necessary.
Yep, there are sites on the internet that will happily generate a fake address for you. Slap a name on and a fake e-mail address if required and you're good to go.Well you have to put an address as well. To be fair, that's not exactly hard to fake.
Anyway, gone up 73k signatures in 30minutes.
Yep, there are sites on the internet that will happily generate a fake address for you. Slap a name on and a fake e-mail address if required and you're good to go.
Of course when actually checking the signatures (which i assume they do to verify legitimacy) they'd likely catch a lot of them
Then they should not have taken part in a referendum when they thought they could win it. You should have petitionned against the referendum when it was announced, not when the outcome disappoints you.
What were the lies that the remain campaign told? Some may have been "pie-in-the-sky" ideas which are unlikely, but not impossible.Same with the remain campaign, they also told lies, so if 5% of remain voters would have changed their vote without the remain campaign lies, the result would have been extended. Both sides told lies. I don't agree with the £350m figure that the leave campaign threw around. It's was deceiving and i agree it was misleading. It was also like Camerons inferring that Britain leaving the EU would cause World War 3. It would never happen, but he still went ahead with it trying to scare people. Yes i know they're totally different, but it was the way of the campains. Leave tried to point out benefits of leaving, and remain tried their best to scare people into staying.
Easily done again using Google or Outlook. I've not voted on it, and i've never actually used the petition site before, i just wanted to see if there was any way it checked to see if you were a genuine British citizen, but all it does is use a tickbox.You need a legit email address though (if you had voted you'd know) as you need to confirm the email address with a link in an email before the vote is confirmed.
Then they should not have taken part in a referendum when they thought they could win it. You should have petitionned against the referendum when it was announced, not when the outcome disappoints you.
You can't keep having referenda until you get the result you want. If the next referendum is a 'remain', will there be a third referendum for the ones who want an exit? And you expect the other EU member states to wait until the country is tired of referenda and finally the last one counts?
Some of the mental gymnastics by people upset at the result are amazing.
Over and over again I see people post that this matter was too important to be left to the citizenship and should have been decided by our elected representatives because they are, supposedly, more intelligent and informed than the 'average voter'. They believe the very idea of having a referendum was idiocy. But the referendum came from our MPs. It was planned by the Prime Minister and voted through parliament. Their line of reasoning is essentially: 'ordinary people are too stupid to know what to do, we should have left it to the morons who were stupid enough to trust the ordinary people'.
Same.Well I actually voted for a party that opposed holding a referendum in its 2015 manifesto.
It's not a legally binding referendum. It can be ignored at will
the bbc see guy seems to be a lot more negative on the chances then the other guy.Read this, very good tbh.
Easily done again using Google or Outlook. I've not voted on it, and i've never actually used the petition site before, i just wanted to see if there was any way it checked to see if you were a genuine British citizen, but all it does is use a tickbox.
Do you have to be a physical UK resident to vote on these petitions? If so, surely they'd GeoIP lock them?
So this was the count at 4pm:
1,688,304
What about this petition though?
https://www.change.org/p/sadiq-khan-declare-london-independent-from-the-uk-and-apply-to-join-the-eu