Red Dreams
Full Member

no arguments there mate.
Not football....
Manchester United.
That is all.
I'd rather watch Accrinton Stanley than the Yankees or the Red Sox or whoever
no arguments there mate.
Not football....
Manchester United.
That is all.
I'd rather watch Accrinton Stanley than the Yankees or the Red Sox or whoever![]()
I love the fact that this country treats kids sorts like they're professionals.understand.
like watching paint dry its been said.
but I like occasionally going to ball games rather than watching it on telly.
The atmosphere and all the hoopla that goes with it.
St Paul Saints are a fun to watch too.
Its fun to watch kids baseball especially.
all the fuss that's made about it.
One of the things I love about this country.
Glad this nonsense is over. It's good that the report has come almost 2 years before the next election. Anytime closer and it would have been a big talking point and given Kumquat a huge boost in 2020. Always felt nothing much was going to come out of it. Felt Trump was so against the "witch hunt" because being a narcissistic asshole he couldn't tolerate people questioning the legitimacy of his win. He doesn't miss a chance to brag about the number of electoral college votes he won. Hope now that the 2020 Dem candidates can fully focus on the real issues that matter to the people in this country rather than hoping for any help from the special counsel to beat Trump.
The issue remain the same - Healthcare, income equality, the courts, systematic corruption, gun reforms, immigration reforms....the list goes on. We need to tackle Trump and the Repubs on that, not some fecking Russian collusion.
And yeah, my heart goes out to all the folks who had invested too much time and energy into this. Feel really sad that this didn't give you a chance to quote your old posts with a '' smiley.
I love the fact that this country treats kids sorts like they're professionals.
But baseball sucks.
My friend from England loves it though. Watches it on TV at home.
I tried to watch the Florida Marlins when they won the world series and I've had friends that have given me all the nuances of the game. To me its still rounders and its boring as all hell.
I told my son if he decided baseball was his thing then I promise that his mom will go to all his games.
I hate cricket tooFunny.
Baseball reminds me more of Cricket.
ok...a kids version of the great game.![]()
Feel free to start a new thread in the general so we can discuss thisnow my estimation of you tanked.![]()
Not exonerated of obstruction. No collusion.Mueller stated, as quoted by Barr, that Trump was not exonerated.
A part of me just died.But baseball sucks.
I keep reading things like this in this thread. And I can't figure out who it's aimed at. Did any Dem candidates in 2018 run on the idea of investigating Trump about Russia?Glad this nonsense is over. It's good that the report has come almost 2 years before the next election. Anytime closer and it would have been a big talking point and given Kumquat a huge boost in 2020. Always felt nothing much was going to come out of it. Felt Trump was so against the "witch hunt" because being a narcissistic asshole he couldn't tolerate people questioning the legitimacy of his win. He doesn't miss a chance to brag about the number of electoral college votes he won. Hope now that the 2020 Dem candidates can fully focus on the real issues that matter to the people in this country rather than hoping for any help from the special counsel to beat Trump.
The issue remain the same - Healthcare, income equality, the courts, systematic corruption, gun reforms, immigration reforms....the list goes on. We need to tackle Trump and the Repubs on that, not some fecking Russian collusion.
And yeah, my heart goes out to all the folks who had invested too much time and energy into this. Feel really sad that this didn't give you a chance to quote your old posts with a '' smiley.
It was dead when you realized the national sport was baseball. That's why you went looking for something more. From all of us from England. You're welcomeA part of me just died.
"Collusion isn't a crime"Not exonerated of obstruction. No collusion.
Are any presidential candidates running on it?I keep reading things like this in this thread. And I can't figure out who it's aimed at. Did any Dem candidates in 2018 run on the idea of investigating Trump about Russia?
Just stating a fact. Not passing judgement."Collusion isn't a crime"
Not that I know of. I do keep hear them talking about various ideas on healthcare, taxes, the economy, justice reform, guns. But most were deferring to letting Mueller finishing his investigation and drawing conclusions after reading the report. Crazy libs."Collusion isn't a crime"
Are any presidential candidates running on it?
I thought on the whole the discussions were good. By investing in the procedures and speculating we all learned together in spite of different political leanings.
Its not over by a long way though.
Realise you are all puffy about this Summary Report which favoured Trump...but still did not exonerate him from Obstruction.
Lets wait for the full report and what Congress does when it gets it. Calling Mueller to testify before the committees.
I don't take back what I still believe about Trump being a Russian asset.
The basis for that is what happened after he became president . The secret meetings and Helsinki and what McCabe said to leaders of Congress.
An eternity before the primaries.
EDIT:
As to my characterization of Trump being a full blown racist, criminal and traitor, I stand by that too.
Not exonerated of obstruction. No collusion.
There’s something he knows... and in time Comey will be proven right.what
Amazing how everyone is jumping to conclusions & freaking out over the Barr report. That report is certainly not the end all be all to all investigations of Trump. It was created & delivered pretty damn quickly by someone who clearly showed bias before he became AG.
The report that is shown to the public must not have large swaths of it redacted.
Do you not see how it looks, when you're questioning the legitimacy of the report and demanding more be done off the back of it? That is, explicitly, what democrats were suggesting the republicans would do when the common assumption was that the report would be damning for Trump. How can people take those views seriously, when they change so dramatically?
He's questioning the Barr summary, not the Mueller report. I don't think that's unreasonable at all.
Saying that Barr's obvious bias should make people suspicious of the content of the summary, when it outlines the facts very clearly and quotes the special counsel on the key elements of it, is a huge statement.
For Barr to withhold critical information with the world watching would be ludicrous, and there's nothing he's done in his short time as AG that remotely justifies such scepticism. When you add in how little scepticism was applied to the more damaging speculation about the report just weeks prior to this, it completely undermines the legitimacy of any previous concerns about Republicans refusing to accept the results of the report.
The implication was that this scepticism of the end outcome would be completely baseless, pure partisan politics, and an indication of the ridiculous position the GOP now find themselves in. Yet now the pendulum has swung the other way, the democrats are going in the direction which just weeks ago they abhorred. Some went as far as to describe it as "un-American". Trust the process and the justice system.
It just underlines that everything here is partisan first, legitimate analysis of the facts comes second. I'm not sure why anyone thinks that is in their best interests. If the goal is to have democrats' decisions and actions be taken seriously, and viewed as being in the best interests of the country, they need to take themselves seriously first.
Also, @calodo2003's overarching point in this thread echoes many others, which is to be sceptical of the whole thing. Why did it end so soon? Why was the report produced so slowly (and now, so quickly)? What about all those unsealed indictments? Something seems fishy here.
That attitude is entirely in keeping with how they predicted "the other side" would act. Do you disagree?