The Mueller Report

ChaddyP said:
i get so confused when Red Dreams and Red Defence quote each other in here :lol:
Click to expand...

There's an easy way of telling them apart: if there's more than one sentence per line, it's not Red Dreams. Very occasionally he'll stretch it to two, but then he's really trying to make a paragraph.

There's another way, but it's not as scientific. If the post feels like a poem, it's also Red Dreams.
 
niMic said:
There's an easy way of telling them apart: if there's more than one sentence per line, it's not Red Dreams. Very occasionally he'll stretch it to two, but then he's really trying to make a paragraph.

There's another way, but it's not as scientific. If the post feels like a poem, it's also Red Dreams.
Click to expand...


Get @Reddy Rederson sort it out.
 
niMic said:
There's an easy way of telling them apart: if there's more than one sentence per line, it's not Red Dreams. Very occasionally he'll stretch it to two, but then he's really trying to make a paragraph.

There's another way, but it's not as scientific. If the post feels like a poem, it's also Red Dreams.
Click to expand...
:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
The Firestarter said:
Didn't you hear Mueller stating that he will not say anything beyond what has already been written in the report?
Click to expand...

Which is fine, he doesn’t need to.

Firstly, they need Mueller saying what is in the report on every news station across the globe.

Secondly, they can ask him to clarify what he means and provide context.

Thirdly, half the report is redacted, there is plenty more to hear about the report.
 
Pexbo said:
Which is fine, he doesn’t need to.

Firstly, they need Mueller saying what is in the report on every news station across the globe.

Secondly, they can ask him to clarify what he means and provide context.

Thirdly, half the report is redacted, there is plenty more to hear about the report.
Click to expand...
You expect him publicly commenting on the redacted parts?
 
The Firestarter said:
Didn't you hear Mueller stating that he will not say anything beyond what has already been written in the report?
Click to expand...
Lindsey Graham the chair of the Senate judiciary hasnt Read the Mueller report yet. Robert Mueller could go out there and read the report verbatim and it would be much more useful than him not testifying
 
Oldham said:
Seemed nervous in his voice...
Click to expand...
Yes. I have to say that I missed a lot of what Mueller said because I was struck by the way he was speaking. Did mention that he sounded angry and upset but his voice also had a nervous element to it.

A few days ago I listened to a small compilation from Mueller’s previous testimonies to Congress and he was noticeably different to how he was in his statement yesterday. Granted he doesn’t like being in front of the cameras but answering questions in Congress with all cameras trained on him for hours is not easier than making a short public statement.
 
Republicans: they mostly come at night...mostly.
 
He desperately wanted to add: ...'unlike John McCain!'
 
Stalinesque.
 
nimic said:
There's an easy way of telling them apart: if there's more than one sentence per line, it's not Red Dreams. Very occasionally he'll stretch it to two, but then he's really trying to make a paragraph.

There's another way, but it's not as scientific. If the post feels like a poem, it's also Red Dreams.
Click to expand...
:lol:
 
nimic said:
There's an easy way of telling them apart: if there's more than one sentence per line, it's not Red Dreams. Very occasionally he'll stretch it to two, but then he's really trying to make a paragraph.

There's another way, but it's not as scientific. If the post feels like a poem, it's also Red Dreams.
Click to expand...

:lol:
 


Can you imagine the evidence/logs that are redacted in the report?
 
Perhaps I'm off here but that reads like Dowd was tap-dancing around potential legal hell and likely with an enraged Trump hawking nearby like a stalking butler.
 
Steve Bannon volunteers that he helped concoct the story that the Mueller investigation was the demon spawn of the “deep state”, and says there was never much substance to it.

As Wolff tells it, “among the nimblest conspiracy provocateurs of the Trump age, Bannon spelled out the … narrative in powerful detail”. But then Bannon’s voice pierces his own self-generated din: “You do realize … that none of this is true.” Allow that one to sink in.

Wolff also has Bannon calling the Trump Organization a criminal enterprise and predicting its downfall: “This is where it isn’t a witch-hunt – even for the hardcore, this is where he turns into just a crooked business guy … Not the billionaire he said he was, just another scumbag.”
Click to expand...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/02/siege-review-michael-wolff-trump-fire-and-fury
 
Dems so desperate to have someone testify .

Former Nixon White House counsel John Dean is being called to testify on Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation report.

Dean, who also testified during the Watergate era, is expected to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on June 10, according to Politico.




“These hearings will allow us to examine the findings laid out in Mueller’s report so that we can work to protect the rule of law and protect future elections through consideration of legislative and other remedies,” Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said in a statement.
Click to expand...
 



Tomorrow’s breaking news: Robert Mueller agrees to public testimony with Congress.
 
Fergies Gum said:
This has to be the one of the most anticipated testimonies in recent US history.
Click to expand...

Yep. He's doing it in front of two separate committees as well. This will basically be the Dems pretext towards legitimizing and selling impeachment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.