Archie Leach
Gooner
I think it's like fat in a can.The Help - What the hell is Crisco anyway? 7/10.
I think it's like fat in a can.The Help - What the hell is Crisco anyway? 7/10.
How does it compare to the recent Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy?The spy who came in from the cold (1965) - 8/10
Does not get better than this, adaptation of a John Le Carre Novel. Spy/Espionage thriller at its very best.
How does it compare to the recent Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy?
I assume you've watched that one?
No One Knows About Persian Cats - Bahman Ghobadi (2009)
Iranian docudrama that follows 2 musicians in Tehran searching the underground indie music scene of Tehran for some backing musicians to take to the West. The movie is made basically to highlight this underground music indie scene in Tehran where real groups are featured who must take massive risks to make their music, and I believe the filmmaker also took risks filming them. Fantastic music featured with its Persian flavored Indie rock, which I believe could rival most indie scenes of American and European cities. Who would've thunk it? Great, sad storyline as well.
Once again, a real risk taking Iranian low budget film made with natural actors that is infinitely more interesting than 95% of the cinematic pap coming out of the West. Don't know where the title of Persian Cats came from, except one scene where the two protagonists are interviewing another band of musicians and a cat is meowing heavily during the whole scene, which funnily enough, was driving my cat at home insane.
9 cocks up
I was hoping that nobody spotted the mistakeWhat rating can you give it, Paul?
Captain America: The Winter Soldier - I arrived at this one with quite big expectations. I though the original Captain America was good but nothing more and also liked the man out of time role they gave him in Avengers Assemble and wanted to see what more they could do with that. I also heard from a source I can't remember that this might be as good as Avengers (a film I rate very highly), and to be fair it starts out very well with its political thriller-esque plot. Unfortunately it doesn't quite live up to that initial promise and the moment where it begins to go wrong is round about when they have a conversation with a computer(can't say any more than that). They seem to be trying to shoehorn links to the original movie into this one and all of them have been handled in a very clumsy fashion. There is still enough action there to keep things reasonably interesting but there are some serious missteps in the plot that stop it being as interesting a movie as it could and should have been. Can't really fault any of the actors as they all do a solid job but the script needed to be a lot sharper than this and needed to capitalize on the initially good setup. A decent movie and worth seeing for the action but a missed opportunity for me.
6.5/10
I saw Snowpiercer, a sprawling runaway engine of a film. It reminds me a lot of Terry Gilliam's Brazil and not just because the evil studio bosses want to cut it up. As with Brazil it's smart, absurd and I can see exactly why it would make the money men nervous. Like other Bong Joon-ho films the structure is unruly and the tonal shifts are sharp. It's a long film and not all of it is good, but some of it is really good. I particularly like the scene in which Tilda Swinton - channeling Pauline from the Royston Vasey job centre - puts a boot on a mans head, in order to quell the enshoeing "size 10 chaos".
Noah
Got off to a promising start, more fantasy than religion with some nice stylistic touches from Aronofsky, but descended into hokey melodrama in the second half and a good chunk of the cast were woeful. Emma Watson wasn't up to it and Douglas Booth is useless. Ray Winstone looked like a fat Mickey Rourke. Disappointing. And stupid.
I'm going to hazard a guess and say you don't know the background history of said computer / character? If you don't, I can fully understand why you felt that way about the scene - it would come across pretty damn ridiculous to myself if I didn't know.This part really is quite jarring for adults. When it happens you can feel the whole movie drop two or three full points. Like they needed to kick you in the nuts with a reminder that you're watching a kid's movie.
Couldn't agree with you more. Radcliffe is the one that baffles me the most. He's so... wooden. Never enjoyed the HP films, mostly down to them (also cos of the general shiteness, but mainly them).Emma Watson isn't a good actress. Neither is Daniel Radcliffe. They're both quite poor to average actors who will continue to make millions upon millions regardless because of a fortunate decision a casting director made 13 years ago. They're stealing a living.
I'm going to hazard a guess and say you don't know the background history of said computer / character? If you don't, I can fully understand why you felt that way about the scene - it would come across pretty damn ridiculous to myself if I didn't know.
This part really is quite jarring for adults. When it happens you can feel the whole movie drop two or three full points. Like they needed to kick you in the nuts with a reminder that you're watching a kid's movie.
I'm going to hazard a guess and say you don't know the background history of said computer / character? If you don't, I can fully understand why you felt that way about the scene - it would come across pretty damn ridiculous to myself if I didn't know.
She's given some meaty scenes across from Crowe in this and is just so out of her depth. But she still looks like Meryl Streep next to Douglas Booth, who is too ridiculously pretty to be in any film like this. Logan Lerman is the only young one who pulls it off.Emma Watson isn't a good actress. Neither is Daniel Radcliffe. They're both quite poor to average actors who will continue to make millions upon millions regardless because of a fortunate decision a casting director made 13 years ago. They're stealing a living.
Where did you see it? And what was wrong with the ending?Snowpiercer. I really enjoyed it, the movie felt fresh, Tilda Swinton is always good to watch and it kept me intrigued to find out what's ahead. I wasn't quite happy with the ending, but that was the only downside in a very pleasant ride. 8/10
I think I should rather ignore your first questionWhere did you see it? And what was wrong with the ending?
Emma Watson isn't a good actress. Neither is Daniel Radcliffe. They're both quite poor to average actors who will continue to make millions upon millions regardless because of a fortunate decision a casting director made 13 years ago. They're stealing a living.
Pretty standard across the industry though, no?
Stealing a living but I always wonder how hard it must have been for them in those roles as a kid. For that I can accept it more than your standard come out of nowhere shit actor/actress.
I think I should rather ignore your first questionAbout the ending:
I guess my problem was that I didn't have subtitles so I didn't quite get the short korean monologue towards the end which may or may not have explained it better. I just didn't see the point in blowing up the train and killing everybody on board, there was just no motive to do it. If I were clutching at straws, they may have just wanted to blow open the hatch to get away from the mob, however since going outside meant certain death, that didn't make any sense too.
The positive side of people like Watson and Radcliffe having great success, is that fame hungry youngsters with even less talent than them spend their lives trying to fruitlessly emulate these stars, vainly believing that they too have that "certain something". So they waste their entire lives. Unhappy. Unfulfilled. And then die. For that, I thank the Emma Watsons and Daniel Radcliffe's of this world and their sheer averageness.
How did you know I'd read this...Couldn't agree with you more. Radcliffe is the one that baffles me the most. He's so... wooden. Never enjoyed the HP films, mostly down to them (also cos of the general shiteness, but mainly them).
At least the ginger one (not you Big Red) seems he knows how to act.
The positive side of people like Watson and Radcliffe having great success, is that fame hungry youngsters with even less talent than them spend their lives trying to fruitlessly emulate these stars, vainly believing that they too have that "certain something". So they waste their entire lives. Unhappy. Unfulfilled. And then die. For that, I thank the Emma Watsons and Daniel Radcliffe's of this world and their sheer averageness.
You kind of got mixed up there. Someone like Lindsay Lohan got found out because she's a bit of an arsehole who went off the rails. It wasn't related to her talent.
What they deliver "at that age" is remarkable considering they don't have drama / acting lessons and stuff.
Lindsay Lohan got found out, Maculay Culkin got found out.
IMHO Emma Watson got what it takes to make a fine actress