People always slam Perisic with stats but seem to excuse Costa. 50 appearances for Bayern and only 8 goals. 141 appearances for Sharkhtar and only 29 goals.
How is he better than Perisic?
They slam Perisic for his age, but Costa is less than 2 years younger.
Minus dribbling, what does he have over Perisic who is as quick, two footed and more versatile upfront?
He is a good player no doubt but no one should admit this and then describe Perisic as average.
Point is Perisic plays for a sh*tty club that never contends, while Costa for a club always going for the treble. Different environments, different pressure, different output, you can't make a unicorn of a donkey only because United starts following him. Mourinho needs donkeys at this stage of your rebuilding because the PL is very tiring and you come from four very bad seasons.