dichinero
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2013
- Messages
- 7,153
Transfer within leagues will always command higher fees. Standard stuff really.
That would be the Salah replacement sorted if they get Mahrez.Roma are the frontrunners to sign Leicester City's Riyad Mahrez, according to the Leicester Mercury.
Leicester rejected a £20million offer from Roma for Mahrez, according to Sky in Italy, but the Italians are preparing a new offer between £30m and £35m, plus add-ons.
his is still thought to be well below Leicester’s valuation of last year’s PFA Player of the Year – who want £50m.
Absolutely no chance City sell us Aguero.
If it happened (and assuming he can stay fit for much of the season) they'd be handing us the league title in my opinion. Agüero is still top class and I'm not sure why Pep doesn't seem to fancy him as much as previous managers did.Exactly. They wouldn't want to msrengthen a direct rival and they don't need money.
Struggling to think of where Ross Barkley would even play in that Spurs team. They're stacked with quality in CM and Eriksen plays the playmaker role.
Any thoughts on who City would replace Augero with?
I'd assume they would want to replace him with Sanchez
If it happened (and assuming he can stay fit for much of the season) they'd be handing us the league title in my opinion. Agüero is still top class and I'm not sure why Pep doesn't seem to fancy him as much as previous managers did.
No ambition from that man he has stayed and accomplished nothing at Roma his entire career and will continue to do so, good luck to him.
Then so be it, to get a player out of Tottenham teams have to pay what they want, Spurs always seem to try and penny pinch when it comes to signing players.
Nainggolan, Griezmann, Sneijder.He was never going to join us and was using our interest to get a better contract, with his preferred club.
Same thing applies to Griezeman - he used us to get a better contract, then made up some story that the only reason he chose to stay was the transfer ban. If this was truly the case, he'd have signed for us now, for the move to happen in January, when the transfer ban is lifted.
Naingolan, Schneider, Gaitan, Griezeman, Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar, Ramos - none of these players will be playing for us in their prime. When they are 35+ and if we are interested, they may join.
Doesn't seem very Spursy to spend 40-50m on a squad player. Nor would it make sense for Barkeley to move to a club where he isn't starting every week. He'll want to be an England regular I would imagine with the World Cup approaching.
Why do Spurs need an attacking central midfielder? They play Alli- a natural number 8- there because he can score goals and links up well with Kane. They have Erikson and Lamela who would probably prefer to play there (injury permitting). What they badly need is pace and width in the final third, and possibly a different striking option to Kane. Throughout the team's core they are solid as a rock.
Slow for Premier League transfers in this widow so far. It's all Serie A doing the deals at the moment it seems.
He's no Cantona but I'm already excited for his return game
I think it shows character and loyalty towards Roma. The PL and even United has a bit of mercenary look about it nowadays. Hamsik and now Nainggolan are examples of players in Serie A who, by staying at their clubs, are not only endearing themselves to fans but also ensuring continuity in the team's structure and managers building teams around them. The latter part is a matter of prestige as well.No ambition from that man he has stayed and accomplished nothing at Roma his entire career and will continue to do so, good luck to him.
Why would they get a ban?
Have Milan sold anyone to accomodate all those new players? There's even talk they are going to go for one more striker