calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Started under Trump apparently.And the left are doing a great job. Nice to see the Ministry of Truth becoming a thing.
Started under Trump apparently.And the left are doing a great job. Nice to see the Ministry of Truth becoming a thing.
Said this for years, that this country will divide itself into five or six blocks of former states. It will be messy & fluid.My belief is that its the blue states that will one day say pheck it, we're out of here. And the breakup will not be into a red vs blue, but 5 or 6 blocks. I can totally see Texas going alone.
I like interacting with you more in the football thread, not about existential issues like these.Honestly, the world has regressed so much in the past 5-10 years.
Could be, a lot of Latino immigrants who are undoubtedly catholic.![]()
![]()
Are the people from that district (which includes the southern suburb of San Antonio) this anti-abortion?
Scariest thing for me would a fundamentalist Christian theocracy with nuclear weapons and aircraft carriers.If the blue states initiate it, you’ll have civil war, terrorism and guerrilla warfare in a very short period of time as many of the red states slip into abject poverty without the blue state funded federal handouts.
Wouldn’t making it a law be even more dangerous. As in, the next time Republicans control both chambers and the presidency, not only they can unmake the law, but make abortion illegal by passing a new law (which would be close to impossible as long as the filibuster is there)? So it probably made sense for it to be protected by the Supreme Court. But not anymore now that lunatics control it.The Republicans are evil, but the Democrats have had decades to make sure it's passed into law (like every other first-world country, and many of the others). This is just the logical consequence of the supremely fecked American system of governance. First past the post + winner takes all, the electoral college, judicial supremacy, filibuster, and everything else.
It barely functions as a country anymore.
The best we ever had, though.Democracy is a flawed system
Manchin still votes much more with Dems than the Republicans, and he is arguably the only Democrat who can win West Virginia. So even if he does not vote for most extreme Democrat measures (which there is nothing to suggest that the Dems are planning to do anyway), he is still a net positive for them.I just hope that the Democrats can eventually gain a couple more senators so they can finally expel Sinema and Manchin out of the party. Those 2 clowns have done more than enough damage already, those two-faced goblins.
The best we ever had, though.
I am not saying it is fair, or perfect, or even particularly good. Just that far better than any other system our species ever devised.Some issues matter more than "majority wants it".
if 49% are fighting for their lives vs a 51% majority that are "meh" about an issue, how is it fair?
There's various degrees of flawed but I struggle to see how the American version is actually a democracy at all.Democracy is a flawed system
Oh no, what did I do wrong?!I like interacting with you more in the football thread, not about existential issues like these.
No, nothing wrong at all, it’s just more enjoyable interacting with you on a fun subject. I associate you with the NFL thread.Oh no, what did I do wrong?!![]()
Wouldn’t making it a law be even more dangerous. As in, the next time Republicans control both chambers and the presidency, not only they can unmake the law, but make abortion illegal by passing a new law (which would be close to impossible as long as the filibuster is there)? So it probably made sense for it to be protected by the Supreme Court. But not anymore now that lunatics control it.
Yup, I tend to agree with this. Supreme Court writing laws instead of legislators doing so is pretty crazy.Sure, but that's just democracy. The purpose of Congress has to be to pass legislation. Otherwise you're just passing the problem on to an even lower number of people, and as you point out it's not like that avenue is looking too hot for abortion rights right now.
Manchin still votes much more with Dems than the Republicans, and he is arguably the only Democrat who can win West Virginia. So even if he does not vote for most extreme Democrat measures (which there is nothing to suggest that the Dems are planning to do anyway), he is still a net positive for them.
Sinema on the other hand would be nice to get replaced. As Kelly showed, a Dem can win Arizona (who also voted Biden).
They are no different from each other. Both money-grabbing griftersAgreed. I'm annoyed when people equate the two. WV is Trump heartland so Manchin has no choice but Sinema is choosing to be a prick.
Haha yeah I get you.No, nothing wrong at all, it’s just more enjoyable interacting with you on a fun subject. I associate you with the NFL thread.
Agreed. I'm annoyed when people equate the two. WV is Trump heartland so Manchin has no choice but Sinema is choosing to be a prick.
When does his term end? There's no way another Dem will win there after.
They are no different from each other. Both money-grabbing grifters
But if he does that then the Republicans can just do the same when they take over and it becomes a race to who knows what.Abortion news is pissing me off
If Joe had balls, he'd nominate a couple of extra SCJs to tip the scales. This is why you vote as left you can. You cant pretend nothing happened, you'll lose in the long run. You need extremes to unfeck things the GOP feck up whenever they're in power.
But if he does that then the Republicans can just do the same when they take over and it becomes a race to who knows what.
Remember when they blocked a SCJ nomination 'till after the presidential election?But if he does that then the Republicans can just do the same when they take over and it becomes a race to who knows what.
Did he just snort cocaine?
The undercover work of former U.S. government informants suspected of plotting to kill Haiti’s president has compelled Miami federal prosecutors to seal off evidence about their past activities in the interest of U.S. national security, saying the information is classified and cannot be turned over to the defense in the widening investigation.
The decision means that the U.S. criminal case, which has run parallel to a faltering probe in Haiti, could become even more secretive in the United States and leave a trail of unanswered questions about how a group of Colombian commandos, a former FBI informant connected to a Miami-area security firm and two ex-Drug Enforcement Administration informants all came to be accused of participating in the deadly assault.