Westminster Politics

If they were fantastic they wouldn't have been so easily ripped apart. One led to the other.
Also, and sorry to go back to this after replying to you previously, as I just reread those election pledges, but which of these policies were bad? To me it reads increasingly like the choice for a genuine positive future for this country that we're further away from achieving than ever before.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50501411
 
Is that the Spanish view or the Catalan view? :wenger:

The plan was originally supposed to do exactly that but it has slowly been stripped down. HS3 was supposed to link the Northern cities and HS2 was to connect them to London. It would have been brilliant. HS3 has become little more than some new track on the existing line and HS2 looks like its going to be a small London commuter route.

Is an honest view. Spain after china is the country with more km of HS in the world with doesnt make sense with only 40 million population. There are HS train stops on towns of 1000 inhabitants with a wooping average of 1 raider a day. Meanwhile the second and third biggest cities, at a perfect HS train distance to make sense are not connected. And the mediterranian coast with 5 of the top 7 cities could benefit much more than any other line.

Even the european funded commerce line that europe told spain to make through the cost bc it makes much more economic sense, spain put an alternative to do it though madrid

Centralism is the usual. That doesnt mean that is what it make sense. And in spain small towns would benefit much more of regional transport investment that having a useless HS train station
 
In any country ,wherever the 'seat of government' lies, there resides the most money, spending, development, services, projects, etc. run by the government. This tends to be true whether it's a democracy or not.

That doesnt mean that certain projects make more sense from an economically an developing POV
 
Also, and sorry to go back to this after replying to you previously, as I just reread those election pledges, but which of these policies were bad? To me it reads increasingly like the choice for a genuine positive future for this country that we're further away from achieving than ever before.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50501411

His policies were fantastic and fully costed. It just would have taken money away from those who had it to spare in bucket loads.
 
In the next few days we will all see more of the new-look Rishi Sunak.

'Mr Safe Pair of Hands' is gone - it's 'No more Mr Nice Guy' now.

Less of the touchy feely "green crap", as his forerunner David Cameron once branded it - more of the red meat for motorists and rhetoric for Tory members. And if that means the home secretary riling up the left about refugees, so be it.

Meet Rishi Sunak the "change candidate", to use the political jargon. The man who wants to tell you why the country is going wrong - and how he'll fix it.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66970426

A totally-not-a puff piece from the former BBC Political Editor ahead of the interview tomorrow morning.
 
A totally-not-a puff piece from the former BBC Political Editor ahead of the interview tomorrow morning.
The man who wants to tell you why the country is going wrong - and how he'll fix it.
So he's just going to come out and say "it's basically my fault, and I'm planning on doing more of the same till all my mates are even richer"?
 
So he's just going to come out and say "it's basically my fault, and I'm planning on doing more of the same till all my mates are even richer"?
Kuennsberg - "What's wrong with the country?"
Sunak - "..."
Kuennsberg - "Sorry, that was rude of me. Why are Labour such bastards whereas you're totes amazeballs?"
Sunak - "That's a great question, Lozzaballs! It all began when Gordon Brown sold all of our gold..."
 
Last edited:
Those who think not enough children are killed by speeding cars outside schools deserve political representation too.
 
"not commenting on speculation" is a new level of deceit and non-accountability, now that both the Minister for Transport and the PM have used it within 24 hours about cancelling HS2. No fecking surprise that Laura K didn't want to bring it up again this morning.
Those who think not enough children are killed by speeding cars outside schools deserve political representation too.
Like someone else said earlier; if these driving policies are enough to sway your vote towards the Tories then you were always going to vote for the Tories.

But imagine being the PM who has to base their entire election strategy on some fake War on Motorists. Their internal polling must be poor as feck.
 
Revealed: UK government keeping files on education critics’ social media activity

An Observer investigation finds DfE tried to cancel conference with ‘unsuitable’ speakers – and experts who criticised state education policy had online posts monitored

https://www.theguardian.com/educati...es-on-education-critics-social-media-activity
How is that in any way legal? literal totalitarianism.

Ruth Swailes and Aaron Bradbury, co-authors of a bestselling book on early childhood, were told by the organisers of a government-sponsored event for childminders and nursery workers, which they were due to speak at in March, that the DfE planned to cancel the conference just days before it opened because they were deemed to be “unsuitable” headline speakers.

The event was eventually allowed to go ahead after Swailes and Bradbury threatened the department with legal action, although a senior government official was present to “monitor” what they said.

Speaking to the Observer, Bradbury, principal lecturer in early childhood studies at Nottingham Trent University, said: “I received a phone call from the organisers saying there were some concerns about us being speakers. The DfE had decided we were unsuitable because we had been critical of government policy.”

He said: “To be told that we couldn’t have this debate felt like we were living in a dictatorship, not a democracy.

“We were due to talk about nurturing and early child development. It wasn’t some covert stuff about infiltrating Russia.”

One modern languages expert, Carmel O’Hagan, uncovered an email from DfE officials accusing her of having “an axe to grind” on Twitter, now rebranded as X, and an Excel spreadsheet in which the department detailed who she interacted with. She described the emails among officials about her in her 37-page file as “puerile” and “spiteful”.
 
That doesnt mean that certain projects make more sense from an economically an developing POV
Of course it doesn't, it just a fact of life (well almost) that the seat(s) of government are places of power, and it has been for a long time, since medieval days when, kings, lords, etc. in their castles had the best armies, food, buildings, roads, livestock etc. Those who wield power tend to surround themselves with the 'best', and everything else gravitates (over time) towards such places..... this includes people.
 
Bills set to soar as water companies seek record £96bn spending
https://www.ft.com/content/f92df631-4bae-4995-81cc-66028c62edfb

Privatisation working as well as ever
Honestly, the fecking temerity of water companies seeking to pass this onto the taxpayer/consumer after record profits have been dished out to the 'shareholders' post privatisation. It's so fecking infuriating.

Ofwat have been asked to greenlight the plans - I hope they come down on these cnuts like a hammer.
 
Honestly, the fecking temerity of water companies seeking to pass this onto the taxpayer/consumer after record profits have been dished out to the 'shareholders' post privatisation. It's so fecking infuriating.

Ofwat have been asked to greenlight the plans - I hope they come down on these cnuts like a hammer.
I'm sure Ofwat, like Ofgem and Ofcom, will do everything they can to protect consumers...
 
Please, this cannot be allowed here. For gods sake someone has taken the thread off topic, this is not right mods. I know these posters have a longstanding history here, but this is not right. I can't be the only one that thinks this?
Is the post accurate. Yes.
Fair. Yes.
A reasonable response. Yes.

You may be the only one.
 
I think Sunak is already recognising this in his thinking, 'my God what will happen if those Northerners get a decent transport system, they will start to compete with the South... not on my watch, they already have the Trans-Pennine Link (posh name for M62), The Humber Bridge, for heaven's sake they even have a Ferry across the Mersey, what more do they want...? If HS2 went ahead 'up North' they might stop wearing flat caps and keeping coal in the bath... good gracious'. ;)
He just doesn't care, I don't think he gives it much thought.

The Tories don't care about much. The North is just another topic they don't care about unless it benefits them politically or financially.
 
HS2 not going to Manchester after all then.

What about the spades in the ground? Are they up for grabs now?
I don't understand this one at all. Aren't there already huge pieces of infrastructure built for it along the way? Will they now just be monuments to tory rule from London to the Scottish border!?