Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Messages
- 71,852
- Caf Award
- Grumpy Old Git of the Year 2021
She wasn't supposed to be there. He pushed her out, not a big deal
Exactly.
She wasn't supposed to be there. He pushed her out, not a big deal
Where was security?He seems to have used disproportionate force to the perceived threat. No-one else felt it was necessary to physically remove the woman. The initial shove was aggressive.
If someone like that advanced on the POTUS there would have been a big pile of burly men with a two arms and two legs sticking out of the sides.
So what was supposed to happen, just let her have Carte Blanche & no one do anything? Ok.
Exactly.
When in doubt kick her in the cnut... equality and all thatBecause the only two options in your mind are 'grab by the throat' and 'do nothing'?
Do you have anger issues or something that you can't see a reasonable middle ground that resolves the situation without physical intervention.
He shoved someone posing no direct threat to him up against a wall and choked her. feck off.
Because the only two options in your mind are 'grab by the throat' and 'do nothing'?
Do you have anger issues or something that you can't see a reasonable middle ground that resolves the situation without physical intervention.
The gymnastics are incredible.
yo is there a real place called mansion house?
Bleurrrgghh... They’re all so fecking loathsome. And, dare I say it, quintessentially British?
And in any case, she’s come out and said she doesn’t think it is Criminal Assault.
Bleurrrgghh... They’re all so fecking loathsome. And, dare I say it, quintessentially British?
The gymnastics are incredible.
She should not have been there in the first place, feck her.
He's got the PM job in the bag.
Apparently the police initially denied that this happened but then admitted that it did after they realized that the press already had a fair bit of info:
A bit worrying that they denied it initially.
.The neighbour said they recorded the altercation from inside their flat out of concern for Symonds. On the recording, heard by the Guardian, Johnson can be heard refusing to leave the flat and telling Symonds to “get off my fecking laptop” before there is a loud crashing noise.
Her opinion hardly constitutes a legal verdict. A former Chief Prosecutor in the UK has already tweeted that he believes it is 'no question' that it is assault and should be charged as such. It's clear that the MP had no reason to believe that she posed a threat to him, as a longer video of the event evidences.
Don’t really accept that version of events, but let’s assume you are correct:
Ok, the next time a ground steward runs after a pitch invader and grabs them by the back of the neck & frogmarches them off the pitch & out of OT in similar fashion, let’s charge them with assault then? After all, the steward isn’t being threatened is he & he’s had a few seconds notice to react & catch the invader?
Utter nonsense. Like I say, a role reversal of left/right wing & this doesn’t even get questioned on here & you know it.
Don’t really accept that version of events, but let’s assume you are correct:
Ok, the next time a ground steward runs after a pitch invader and grabs them by the back of the neck & frogmarches them off the pitch & out of OT in similar fashion, let’s charge them with assault then? After all, the steward isn’t being threatened is he & he’s had a few seconds notice to react & catch the invader?
Utter nonsense. Like I say, a role reversal of left/right wing & this doesn’t even get questioned on here & you know it.
Don't be such a clown. Violence against women transcends your ideological views. At least, it should do. If I saw a man do that a woman, my first thought would not be 'hmm, should I intervene, or perhaps the aggressor is a left wing figure in which case it's perfectly fine'.
And I admire the audacity in responding that you 'don't really accept that version of events' when given a legal opinion by a former Chief Prosecutor, simply because it undermines your argument.
No, because if the woman was armed for instance is a man not allowed to use any violent means whatsoever to stop her then in that situation solely because of her sex?
No, because if the woman was armed for instance is a man not allowed to use any violent means whatsoever to stop her then in that situation solely because of her sex?
...& yeah, that’s ONE legal opinion you’ve referred to, not all of them.
Anyway, I know what you lot are like on here, you’ll argue forever & I won’t, so I’m happy for those powers that be to hand out any ‘justice’ in this & make any recommendations. Just glad it’s not you lot making those judgements as they would likely be skewed by your politics as evidenced by most of the viewpoints expressed. Good night![]()
No, because if the woman was armed for instance is a man not allowed to use any violent means whatsoever to stop her then in that situation solely because of her sex?
...& yeah, that’s ONE legal opinion you’ve referred to, not all of them.
Anyway, I know what you lot are like on here, you’ll argue forever & I won’t, so I’m happy for those powers that be to hand out any ‘justice’ in this & make any recommendations. Just glad it’s not you lot making those judgements as they would likely be skewed by your politics as evidenced by most of the viewpoints expressed. Good night![]()
She should not have been there in the first place, feck her.
No, because if the woman was armed for instance is a man not allowed to use any violent means whatsoever to stop her then in that situation solely because of her sex?
...& yeah, that’s ONE legal opinion you’ve referred to, not all of them.
Anyway, I know what you lot are like on here, you’ll argue forever & I won’t, so I’m happy for those powers that be to hand out any ‘justice’ in this & make any recommendations. Just glad it’s not you lot making those judgements as they would likely be skewed by your politics as evidenced by most of the viewpoints expressed. Good night![]()
She wasn't supposed to be there. He pushed her out, not a big deal