DavidDeSchmikes
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 17,408
Agree. Awful story.
But where were his family instead of shouting out loud after this poor man's death
Graham’s family this week blamed the Department for Work and Pensions for his death in June 2018, saying it should not have cut off the financial lifeline of a man it knew to be highly vulnerable. “He would still be alive. He’d be ill but he’d still be alive,” said his daughter-in-law Alison Turner.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...arved-to-death-after-dwp-stopped-his-benefits
The grandfather, who had suffered with severe social anxiety, had cut himself off from family and friends.
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/news/local-news/tragic-errol-graham-starved-death-3789461
Pretty common thing to happen with people suffering from social anxiety. But let's be honest, you don't actually think this story is awful because if you did there wouldn't be any need for your little rant at the grieving family members. If you really did care then you would instead blame a system which for the last decade has been attacking the most vulnerable people in Britain but then again maybe just maybe, I'm giving far too much credit to the conservative thought process.
Thing is that Boris looks to be the first Prime Minister in memory to actually do something that is in acknowledgement of that.
Yeah I was giving you far too much credit.Hardly a rant.
At some point in life, everyone has to take some responsibilty for their family, their friends or those others close to them. Whether the young, the old, the sick, the unemployed, the unfortunates....
It's been more or less like that for thousands of years and remains like that, still, for most people in this world.
The trouble is that in many countries, the younger generations now either don't want to or can't be bothered
You can't just hand over responsibility for the elderly and sick to the state - if every family in the UK did this, then the UK would have thousands of events like this one every week. They wouldn't make headlines and the problem you argue would become even worse because the ' system ' just couldn't cope.
Harsh, but true.
Yeah I was giving you're thought process far too much credit.
My bad.
Most of the news would probably be about Corbyn doing something like building re education camps for Jews
C'mon....You know I'm not a full blown Conservative by a long, long way.
Having said that, this event is not wholly a problem of recent Conservative Governments but more an example and problem of Modern Society.
No Political Party in the UK ( as they are today ) could cope if required to take full responsibility for everyone who needs help, especially the sick and the elderly.
It would be a mistake to believe that it would be much different with Liberal, Green, or Labour Governments.
Firstly its a problem of the last decade of Tory government, I hate New Labour more than well anyone but this sort of stuff didn't happen under their watch. Secondly the problem with modern society isn't a lack responsibility but rather we have become so reliant and responsibly for ourselves as individuals that we are completely alienated from each other(With a big old spoon full of capitalist realism for good measure), which means we find it impossible to imagine something as small as a functioning welfare state.
We are so isolated that we turn to blame grieving family members rather than looking at the active negligence of places like DWP(Individuals can change so of course they should be blamed but change in places like DWP well no that's just ''modern society'.). The DWP knew this person had a history of mental illness and knew he was actively avoiding contact and still cut his benefits. What the feck were they expecting to happen ? But todays welfare system is set with one purpose and that is to get as many people off benefits as possible regardless of the outcomes. They knew what was going to be happen to this man and they didn't care(One of the ''strengths of British conservatism is how openly cruel it is).
The fog of capitalist realism is still pretty strong sadly.
Labour confirms plans for new departments and ‘day one’ scrapping of DWP
https://www.civilserviceworld.com/a...s-new-departments-and-‘day-one’-scrapping-dwp
Election 2019: Labour pledges inquiry into seven years of DWP benefit deaths
https://www.disabilitynewsservice.c...quiry-into-seven-years-of-dwp-benefit-deaths/
If you say so....
Everything is nobody's fault but the Conservative Governments' fault in the Socialists' World.
You'll perhaps grow out of it one day, or end up a perpetual Loony Leftie with only the slightest grasp of how the real world works.
Yeah I was giving you far too much credit.
My bad.
If you say so....
Everything is nobody's fault but the Conservative Governments' fault in the Socialists' World.
You'll perhaps grow out of it one day, or end up a perpetual Loony Leftie with only the slightest grasp of how the real world works.
''Modern Society''The impact of austerity is objectively undeniable and the failure to effectively roll out Universal Credit has contributed to deaths throughout the UK. Public services have been slashed for a period of ten years and the statistics (whether it be mental health, education, NHS targets or housing) all confirm the devastating effect they have had.
That’s the real world, I’m afraid. Perhaps it’s you who should try seeing some more of it. Far too many people (somewhat understandably) live in their little bubble; it’s blissful ignorance.
The government has suffered a humiliating court defeat after it was found to have unlawfully discriminated against thousands of severely disabled people who were left financially worse off after moving on to universal credit.
The court of appeal dismissed a challenge by the Department for Work and Pensions to two previous high court decisions that protected claimants in receipt of severe disability premium against a drop in income under the new benefit.
The cases were brought by two disabled individuals, known as TP and AR, who had sought justice after their benefit income was reduced by £180 a month when they were required to claim universal credit after moving house into a different local authority area.
https://www.theguardian.com/society...t-of-severely-disabled?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
The problem is some of these places when seeing the effects of cuts tend to blame Labour councils, instead of the government. There's such a massive disconnect between people hating cuts to services and blaming the government(There's literally a poster on this page who blames ''modern society'' for the cuts to disable benefits).Yeah couldn't give a stuff either. I'd like to envisage a future whereby when someone calls the council to moan about something you can answer "Can i ask who you voted for? Oh the Tories, go feck yourself then."
Not an ounce of sympathy from me. Struggling to care.
4th September 2019Sajid Javid said:"No department will be cut next year. Every single department has had its budget for day to day spending increased at least in line with inflation.
"That's what I mean by the end of austerity."
''Modern Society''
The problem is some of these places when seeing the effects of cuts tend to blame Labour councils, instead of the government. There's such a massive disconnect between people hating cuts to services and blaming the government(There's literally a poster on this page who blames ''modern society'' for the cuts to disable benefits).
Granted this is purely anecdotal but the amount times during the last election I heard stories about people having no idea that Boris had being tory mp for a number of years and not a Trump like ''outsider'' and that it is in fact the tories who are in government, was very worrying.
Hold on are you really going to have a go at me for being a socialist and then say the effects of capitalism on the global south is a reason to not give a shit about disable people in Britain ?You prefer I say First World Countries rather than Modern Society ?
I spent most of the last 20odd years working in West Africa. Still go quite frequently as we employ about 200 people there.
Who do you think looks after the sick and the elderly in Nigeria or Angola ? Where there are no DWP or Social Security or Wefare System equivalents in those countries or in all the African countries where I've worked. Compassionate and enlightened employers apart, nobody does. The elderly, the sick, the unemployed and unemployable are helped by family and friends and charities. Not the State. In fact, almost anyone but the State.
So perhaps you're right - occasional failures in the the DWP, cut backs in Local Government spending, increased waiting times at NHS Hospitals, are actually a First World problem. Like poor broadband in your neighbourhood or the Air Conditioning in your house not working very well. They're all things to bitch about because so much else is taken for granted in First World countries and so I'm going to let rip when they're not perfect.
Of course, alternatively you could go live in a Third World country and all these problems , and your anger against the Tories, would actually seem fairly pathetic.
Yes, you're right and I was wrong. It's not Modern Society causing problems - it all depends where you live and your levels of expectation.
Let's make a diary note to discuss this again when you've ( 1 ) lived in Third World countries and ( 2 ) are then able to understand how real life works.
Up to you - in six months, six years, when you're in your 50s ??
Pro-tip. If your argument has to rely on "we're not as worse off as other people so stop complaining" then you've already lost.You prefer I say First World Countries rather than Modern Society ?
I spent most of the last 20odd years working in West Africa. Still go quite frequently as we employ about 200 people there.
Who do you think looks after the sick and the elderly in Nigeria or Angola ? Where there are no DWP or Social Security or Wefare System equivalents in those countries or in all the African countries where I've worked. Compassionate and enlightened employers apart, nobody does. The elderly, the sick, the unemployed and unemployable are helped by family and friends and charities. Not the State. In fact, almost anyone but the State.
So perhaps you're right - occasional failures in the the DWP, cut backs in Local Government spending, increased waiting times at NHS Hospitals, are actually a First World problem. Like poor broadband in your neighbourhood or the Air Conditioning in your house not working very well. They're all things to bitch about because so much else is taken for granted in First World countries and so I'm going to let rip when they're not perfect.
Of course, alternatively you could go live in a Third World country and all these problems , and your anger against the Tories, would actually seem fairly pathetic.
Yes, you're right and I was wrong. It's not Modern Society causing problems - it all depends where you live and your levels of expectation.
Hardly a rant.
At some point in life, everyone has to take some responsibilty for their family, their friends or those others close to them. Whether the young, the old, the sick, the unemployed, the unfortunates....
It's been more or less like that for thousands of years and remains like that, still, for most people in this world.
The trouble is that in many countries, the younger generations now either don't want to or can't be bothered
You can't just hand over responsibility for the elderly and sick to the state - if every family in the UK did this, then the UK would have thousands of events like this one every week. They wouldn't make headlines and the problem you argue would become even worse because the ' system ' just couldn't cope.
Harsh, but true.
Hardly a rant.
At some point in life, everyone has to take some responsibilty for their family, their friends or those others close to them. Whether the young, the old, the sick, the unemployed, the unfortunates....
It's been more or less like that for thousands of years and remains like that, still, for most people in this world.
The trouble is that in many countries, the younger generations now either don't want to or can't be bothered
You can't just hand over responsibility for the elderly and sick to the state - if every family in the UK did this, then the UK would have thousands of events like this one every week. They wouldn't make headlines and the problem you argue would become even worse because the ' system ' just couldn't cope.
Harsh, but true.
Let's make a diary note to discuss this again when you've ( 1 ) lived in Third World countries and ( 2 ) are then able to understand how real life works.
Up to you - in six months, six years, when you're in your 50s ??
Hardly a rant.
At some point in life, everyone has to take some responsibilty for their family, their friends or those others close to them. Whether the young, the old, the sick, the unemployed, the unfortunates....
It's been more or less like that for thousands of years and remains like that, still, for most people in this world.
The trouble is that in many countries, the younger generations now either don't want to or can't be bothered
You can't just hand over responsibility for the elderly and sick to the state - if every family in the UK did this, then the UK would have thousands of events like this one every week. They wouldn't make headlines and the problem you argue would become even worse because the ' system ' just couldn't cope.
Harsh, but true.
The walkout took place after a confrontation inside No 10 in which Lee Cain, Johnson’s most senior communications adviser, tried to exclude reporters from the Mirror, i, HuffPost, PoliticsHome, Independent and others.
Reporters on the invited list were asked to stand on one side of a rug in the foyer of No 10, while those not allowed in were asked by security to stand on the other side.
After Cain told the banned journalists to leave, the rest of the journalists decided to walk out collectively rather than allow Downing Street to choose who scrutinises and reports on the government.
Among those who refused the briefing and walked out were the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, ITV’s Robert Peston and political journalists from Sky News, the Daily Mail, Telegraph, Sun, Financial Times and Guardian.
You think that's bad? Jamal Kashoggi got brutally murdered. What are we complaining about?I wonder where the government got this idea from?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...sts-boycott-no-10-briefing-after-reporter-ban
Political journalists boycott No 10 briefing after reporter ban
The walkout took place after a confrontation inside No 10 in which Lee Cain, Johnson’s most senior communications adviser, tried to exclude reporters from the Mirror, i, HuffPost, PoliticsHome, Independent and others.
Reporters on the invited list were asked to stand on one side of a rug in the foyer of No 10, while those not allowed in were asked by security to stand on the other side.
After Cain told the banned journalists to leave, the rest of the journalists decided to walk out collectively rather than allow Downing Street to choose who scrutinises and reports on the government.
Among those who refused the briefing and walked out were the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, ITV’s Robert Peston and political journalists from Sky News, the Daily Mail, Telegraph, Sun, Financial Times and Guardian.
Shame they didn't show that same solidarity when it was just The Mirror that it happened to during the election campaign.The pattern is the same as Trump .Try and shut out the media .Surprised that Sky News , The Mail, Laura Kuenssberg walked out ,but it shows a solidarity which you don't see in the US.
Shame they didn't show that same solidarity when it was just The Mirror that it happened to during the election campaign.