- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 36,021
- Location
- None of your business mate
- Supports
- The greatest team in history
Took a stand and refused to sack his Spads apparently.
So he does have some principles then.
Took a stand and refused to sack his Spads apparently.
It's a fecking patently ridiculous idea and party politics have nothing to do with it.
Javid didn't last long- could never tell how much it was him being an idiot versus how much he was just towing the government' line- eg the stuff about 'Johnson's EU departure deal doesn't need an economic impact assessment because it's obviously a good deal.'
He doesn't have any principles. He's been consistently embarrassed. Last time Trump came, he wasn't invited. He's been overruled constantly.So he does have some principles then.
So he does have some principles then.
Difficult to guess the true politics. Cummings hates Javids advisors apparently so that could be behind it. But ultimately, to have a completely separate team each behind the PM and the Chancellor is bound to cause ructions and it makes sense for there to be a single team supporting both.
Took a stand and refused to sack his Spads apparently.
Difficult to guess the true politics. Cummings hates Javids advisors apparently so that could be behind it. But ultimately, to have a completely separate team each behind the PM and the Chancellor is bound to cause ructions and it makes sense for there to be a single team supporting both.
Alternative viewpoint - ministers should be free to choose their own advisors and a healthy functioning democratic government should welcome opinion and debate with a variety of people from various backgrounds who they may or may not agree with. Choosing to pose a united front to the public/media is a given but in order to make decisions for the good of the country it's probably not wise to cull any dissenters. That's what communists do.
Too brown.
He's got himself another Brown distracterToo brown.
Because they don't want a chancellor, they want someone to smile whilst holding a red box, which is why Javid resigned.Also how the feck has Sunak got the job beyond being a boot licker over the last year.
No idea why she’s so smug, her and Javid will be our on their arse in the first reshuffle. The positive discrimination is no longer necessary.
Yeah it really doesn't and that segregation is an important element of our governmental structure. The treasury being quite an integral office needs some autonomy and the ability to challenge central policy. It seems like Javid and his advisers saying no is the main reason he's got the chop.
We're getting further and further down the populism route. They already constantly attack the civil service and you can guarantee more and more of them will be politicised.
Also how the feck has Sunak got the job beyond being a boot licker over the last year.
He always looked very uncomfortable with relaying the party lines and i assume this means all his reported clashes with Cummimgs are true.
It's a bad sign for me as it's another testament to the idea that Cummings is running the show and Boris won't run as a moderate.
You've just described the Trump way of ruling.Cabinet Ministers be warned, 'feck up' once, answer back, fail to agree and you're out.
Unelected advisor rules back door. Basically, more power than ministers and probably the cabinet.It's a bad sign for me as it's another testament to the idea that Cummings is running the show and Boris won't run as a moderate.
Unelected advisor rules back door. Basically, more power than ministers and probably the cabinet.
Unelected advisor rules back door. Basically, more power than ministers and probably the cabinet.
Fourth NI Secretary in five years.
In that time we've also seen
7 Work and Pensions Secretaries
6 Culture Secretaries
6 Secretaries of State for International Development
5 Justice Secretaries
5 Environment Secretaries
4 Defence Secretaries
4 Education Secretaries
6 Community Secretaries
You've just described the Trump way of ruling.
Its quite covert in Boris because you wouldn’t assume that his nature is one of a theory X manager.....he’s always had the affable buffoon charisma thing. That’s why Cummings is there, who obviously does all the bastard side for himYes. Theory 'X' style of management, i.e.
*Primary form of man management is to kick everybody's ar*e every day, whether they need it or not;
*take no prisoners;
*adopt permanently the "you are for us or you're against us" stance;
*keep everybody guessing, even your allies, (sometimes especially your allies);i
*"Its my way or the highway" (rule of thumb):
*all the above, etc.
Actually it can work... for a while anyway, especially in emergency situations, or when a politician is consistently in 'campaign-mode' (see D Trump). Enemies fall for it, at least for a while, the more they attack you the stronger you get, eventually they tumble to the fact you are the embodiment of theory X and back off. With no enemy to face, nothing to rally the troops, those suffering the ar*e kicking begin to wonder 'what's it all for'? The rots sets in the end comes quickly( or at the next election if you are a politician).
Donald's and Boris's stars are tied together!
''Give them a majority and they will govern from the centre''