He attended the by election as a representative for GB News and not the Tories. Says it all
Rats leaving the sinking ship, or better the stinking ship.
He attended the by election as a representative for GB News and not the Tories. Says it all
The FPTP system is what straddles UK politics and is self perpetuating.
A Tory government with a large majority of 80+ seats is coming to an end and is likely to be replaced by a Labour Government with a similar large majority. The hope is Labour will do a better job for the majority of the populace, but there is no guarantee.
'Events' (outside the governments control) as Harold Macmillan explained can be instrumental in ruining everything; as Suez did for Eden, Iraq for Blair (although he got 3 terms), Financial Crisis did for Brown, Brexit for Cameron and May, Covid for Boris; Liz Truss (for herself really) Money Markets; Small Boats for Sunak.
When Starmer takes over there are no shortage of internal issues, like cost of living, housing, NHS waiting lists/dentistry etc., but there are enormous external 'events,' Wars, those continuing (or further likely to break out) in eastern Europe, Middle-East, etc. mass migration on a hitherto unimaginable level, and of course dealing with climate change.
Why do we persist with a FPTP system? Because there is a 'gut' feeling, than when the country is facing crisis, or when sh** lands from a great height and we didn't see it coming (you can ask why again some other time), the government has to be able to act quickly and it is only with an overall majority (gained by FPTP) can this happen.
Where does this 'gut' feeling come from... law making based for centuries, mainly on precedent.
Yes indeed. But he is already on a reputed £500k with GB News.
At least he's wasting those cnuts' money
In a working democracy with independent press coverage, that sort of behavior should mean that said party will be out of government for a long period.Certainly.
The issue here however is that there's a conveyor belt of ever changing Tory PM's, with different agendas and representing different factions of the party. They aren't governing on the mandate from 2019. They are clinging on and squeezing every last penny they can before they're booted out.
The FPTP system is what straddles UK politics and is self perpetuating.
A Tory government with a large majority of 80+ seats is coming to an end and is likely to be replaced by a Labour Government with a similar large majority. The hope is Labour will do a better job for the majority of the populace, but there is no guarantee.
'Events' (outside the governments control) as Harold Macmillan explained can be instrumental in ruining everything; as Suez did for Eden, Iraq for Blair (although he got 3 terms), Financial Crisis did for Brown, Brexit for Cameron and May, Covid for Boris; Liz Truss (for herself really) Money Markets; Small Boats for Sunak.
When Starmer takes over there are no shortage of internal issues, like cost of living, housing, NHS waiting lists/dentistry etc., but there are enormous external 'events,' Wars, those continuing (or further likely to break out) in eastern Europe, Middle-East, etc. mass migration on a hitherto unimaginable level, and of course dealing with climate change.
Why do we persist with a FPTP system? Because there is a 'gut' feeling, than when the country is facing crisis, or when sh** lands from a great height and we didn't see it coming (you can ask why again some other time), the government has to be able to act quickly and it is only with an overall majority (gained by FPTP) can this happen.
Where does this 'gut' feeling come from... law making based for centuries, mainly on precedent.
Yes indeed. But he is already on a reputed £500k with GB News.
My thoughts exactly. Cameron is the architect of Brexit, all because he knew that without that on the ballot, the Tories would lose seats to UKIP, split the vote and let in a Labour government. Suicidal recklessness.How was Iraq outside Blair's control? If you genuinely believe that you're unhinged. Same goes for Cameron with Brexit and Truss with whatever the feck that was. A competent and/or non-criminal leader doesn't make those mistakes. Problems of their own making. Small boats too tbh, shockingly enough closing the legal migration routes leads to illegal migration. He didn't start the calamitous handling of immigration but he is steering his small boat over the same cliff.
How was Iraq outside Blair's control? If you genuinely believe that you're unhinged. Same goes for Cameron with Brexit and Truss with whatever the feck that was
If you genuinely believe these matters were in the control of these people, then its you who are unhinged.
Blair got suckered into Iraq via Bush and WMD's, Cameron thought he was in control of both his party EU dissidents, and the country, until the Brexit result came in, and Truss thought she had got into her full blown Conservatism stride, only to find it was the money markets who were in control.
So true.Blair had to doctor an intelligence dossier to be released to the public to justify (a second!) illegal war FFS. There's also accounts of him being the one that persuaded Bush to go to war. It's a bit of an "I slipped over and fell arse first on to the ketchup bottle...again" to claim you had no agency in that!
I can't see the FPTP changing, certainly not in my lifetime because the British people like to know the result of the election almost immediately. And who has won. It is engrained in our psyche. And the most recent Tory/Liberals coalition was a disaster, especially for the liberals.
There's also accounts of him being the one that persuaded Bush to go to war.
Jesus spoke to Tony Blair personally and told him to bomb a birth defects crisis into several generations of Iraqi children.Blair had to doctor an intelligence dossier to be released to the public to justify (a second!) illegal war FFS. There's also accounts of him being the one that persuaded Bush to go to war. It's a bit of an "I slipped over and fell arse first on to the ketchup bottle...again" to claim you had no agency in that!
Jesus spoke to Tony Blair personally and told him to bomb a birth defects crisis into several generations of Iraqi children.
It's called white memory syndrome. It's the only way to handle centuries of apartheids and genocides, including current ones. Let it happen then doctor the history later.
And then say something about learning from history - which we just doctored of course.
When did you become so racist on the forum? keep seeing it. Bit troubling.
If there's any racism involved in what I said the poster I replied to can report me. In fact, you can report me. Mods going through these pages will infract or ban me.
I just recall you constantly bringing race in to discussions for some reason. You’ve been pulled a few times on it from memory.
What’s your deal?
There's no deal. Your opinion is yours and your welcome to it
At the age of 36, the Tories have been in power since the minute I really started to care about politics. I did beforehand and voted but I’m talking meaningful interest.
I'm going to stay up, watch and enjoy every single second of the next general election coverage. What a night that will be.
At the age of 36, the Tories have been in power since the minute I really started to care about politics. I did beforehand and voted but I’m talking meaningful interest.
I'm going to stay up, watch and enjoy every single second of the next general election coverage. What a night that will be.
Im also 36 and it feels like our entire generation (and others) are now just completely lost to the tories. I can’t see myself ever voting for them. I don’t see how they recover from this and how they can possibly win back this section of the electorate.
I had you as much older than that!You will be surprised.
I am exactly double your age and politics is cyclic.
Hopefully Labour will win the next GE. But the problems they will be facing are massive. And the resources to address them are limited.
So it will come down to priorities. And no 2 people will agree on those priorities.
So they will become progressively dissatisfied and a new cycle will start.
That is the reality.
You will be surprised.
I am exactly double your age and politics is cyclic.
Hopefully Labour will win the next GE. But the problems they will be facing are massive. And the resources to address them are limited.
So it will come down to priorities. And no 2 people will agree on those priorities.
So they will become progressively dissatisfied and a new cycle will start.
That is the reality.
I had you as much older than that!
Technically there is another option but it would never happen, the King has the ability to kick them outThat's pretty sad. So basically, unless there's huge protests with outbreaks of civil unrest, you're stuck with the Tories until they want to lose their jobs, right?
I would love this. Mostly because we would get a republic in no time.Technically there is another option but it would never happen, the King has the ability to kick them out
Technically there is another option but it would never happen, the King has the ability to kick them out
No idea about that but the monarch does have the power to dissolve parliament by withdrawl of Royal assentIIRC the Queen gave that executive power up in 2011.
Scottish Labour backs motion for 'immediate ceasefire' in Gaza
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-68325563
Labour party up here obviously have a different position to the Labour party down there.