Gio
★★★★★★★★
I'm not too sure of a few of the shouts. Beckham might be an odd fit now that 433 and 4231 are in vogue, but when 442 was king he was the archetypal, hard-running, heavy-crossing wide midfielder. There were loads of them kicking about up till the end of the 1990s. Similarly so for Ozil as although he stands out in today's Premier League, he's quite a typical 10 in many ways. Ronaldinho's a better shout because few marry flamboyance with effectiveness. Most fancy-dan tricksters either have to adapt and become more economical or get squeezed out of the top level and have to spend the rest of their career as a big fish in a wee pond.
Ibrahimovic and Toure are good calls. Ibrahimovic obviously because of that unique combination of size and skill: a target man and a 10. Toure more so because his ability to decide a game is amongst the best ever seen in England from a midfielder. Yet he performs in fits and spurts and rarely the sustained 90-minute dominance that is typically how any central midfielders worth their salt exercise their class. Essentially some of the technical gifts and lethargy of a 10 combined with the physique of a centre-half or midfield anchor.
Yeah. He was a playmaker at left-back. That's quite rare as the more common model is the overlapping athlete (Dani Alves the best current example) or the neat-and-tidy defensively solid type (Lahm, Azpilicueta).
Ibrahimovic and Toure are good calls. Ibrahimovic obviously because of that unique combination of size and skill: a target man and a 10. Toure more so because his ability to decide a game is amongst the best ever seen in England from a midfielder. Yet he performs in fits and spurts and rarely the sustained 90-minute dominance that is typically how any central midfielders worth their salt exercise their class. Essentially some of the technical gifts and lethargy of a 10 combined with the physique of a centre-half or midfield anchor.
Brehme's style was quite unique and he was pretty unpredictable, which as a full-back was saying quite something. He could quite simply do it all, he could own either flank single-handedly, as two-footed as they come (could take free-kicks and penalties with either foot), was likely to either unleash one by cutting inside or playing a sumptuous cross on the outside, capable of significantly influencing play from the back with his excellent build-up play. Great defender to boot as well.
He's one of 5 full backs ever, to finish in a Ballon d'Or top 3 and he also won the Serie A POTY, in a ridiculously strong league featuring the likes of Maldini, Baresi, Gullit, Matthäus, Rijkaard, and Van Basten, as a LB for Christ sake!
The ridiculous bugger had it all. Can hardly think of such an well rounded threat at LB and someone who was such an imposing and versatile threat to opponents.
His match winning exploits at the WC as a FB were legendary to say the least. Scoring in the 86 semis against France and leading the failed comeback in the final against Argentina, with 2 of his corners resulting in goals. Repeated the feat in 1990 by scoring in the semis against England and topping it off with the WC winning goal in the final. Epic stuff.
Yeah. He was a playmaker at left-back. That's quite rare as the more common model is the overlapping athlete (Dani Alves the best current example) or the neat-and-tidy defensively solid type (Lahm, Azpilicueta).