Louis van Gaal | Manchester United manager

Status
Not open for further replies.
Posted this a while ago in another thread but didn't get a reply. It was a way of solving the CB issues we were having.
EDIT: this was prior to Mata

Excuse my tactical naivety, but would a 3-4-2-1 system work better when you have a surplus of CBs?
I believe this would allow for any 2 of Smalling/Jones/Evans to accompany either Rio or Vidic in a back 3, Carrick and Fellaini as CMs, 2 wingers, with Rooney and Kagawa playing behind RVP, while also pressing the opposition higher up the pitch when defending. This way they all get to play in their preferred positions.
I'm probably wide off the mark, but honest feedback would be appreciated.

It seems a little narrow compared to the following, which seems to utilise our full-backs crossing over in attack, while also adding more defensive cover on the wings.

The idea of 3-5-2 is really growing on me. I think that formation would be beneficial for pretty much all of our players (except Nani and Young, who are shit anyway)

Rooney and Van Persie - both could start in their best position, without it hindering the balance of the team
Mata - could start in his best position, with two lethal forwards to create for
Welbeck - more games centrally, rather than out wide
Januzaj - would get to play centrally
Kagawa - he would have to compete with Mata but he would get opportunities at no.10 rather than out wide
Evra - less defensive responsibility
Rafael - more license to bomb forwards
Jones - would get to establish himself as a CB, yet still making use of some of his other attributes
Smalling - more chance to establish himself as a CB
Evans - would relish having license to bring the ball out from defence
Carrick - could play either in the midfield two, or against weaker sides as a ball-playing centre back
Cleverley, Fellaini - neither look good enough in a midfield two, they would benefit from being in a midfield three IMO


This seems an ideal solution, and would be great to see in action, both defensively and going forward.
 
Matt Stanger was in Sao Paulo to witness a masterclass from Louis van Gaal as the Netherlands coach once again demonstrated his tactical acumen to help defeat Chile...

This was a footballing lesson from Louis van Gaal, both on the pitch and in the post-match press conference. The Netherlands manager has been in prickly form over the past few days - accusing FIFA of "playing tricks" with their scheduling for Brazil's final group game - and it showed as he took one unsuspecting American journalist to task over his particular line of questioning.

It was put to Van Gaal that he adopted a negative approach against Chile in Robin van Persie's absence, but the Dutch coach immediately turned the conversation on its head. "Could you give a definition of attacking football? That's my question to you. You have such a clever question. Now give me an answer," said an irritable Van Gaal. The journalist stuttered that it wasn't a criticism but the can of worms had been opened.

"If I played 4-3-3 against Chile, Robben and Lens would have had to run after them. They can't do that for 90 minutes," Van Gaal continued. "It's all about winning. I want to win so I'm going to pick a system that will help me win. I believe that's what football is."

It was a lick of the sharp tongue Premier League reporters can looked forward to next season, but Van Gaal's exasperation was justified considering the 90 minutes it followed. The Netherlands readily ceded the ball to Chile in their Group B decider in Sao Paulo - recording only 32% possession - but limited a relentless opponent to just a single shot on target. As Arjen Robben said when he collected his man of the match award: "We've done our job."

The occasion didn't live up to its pre-match billing despite Chile pressing for the victory they needed to top the group and avoid a potential last-16 clash with Brazil. But Van Gaal's pragmatism was vindicated by the Netherlands securing a 2-0 win when only a draw was required. The Dutch didn't play to control the game, they played to control the best chances.

That was clear from the start as Daley Blind and Nigel de Jong clipped balls over the top of Chile's vertically challenged defence to try and find the darting runs of Robben and Jeremain Lens. The latter attempted more shots (two) than passes (one) in the first half as the Netherlands relied on making the most of their time in possession. While Gary Medel completed more passes than Van Gaal's entire team before the break, it certainly wasn't one-way traffic.

For all Chile's intricate approach play and the cunning of Alexis Sanchez, it was the orange flash of Robben that proved the most devastating attacking outlet for either side. His assist for Memphis Depay in a lightning last-minute counter-attack typified a tireless performance, but he acknowledged the defensive platform on which the result was achieved. "I'm really proud of the way we defended as a team," said Robben. "This is not where we want to stop. We'll take some time to enjoy this - it's a fantastic result, fantastic performance - but it shouldn't end here."

It's likely that it won't with the Netherlands now expecting a favourable last-16 tie against Mexico or Croatia. Considering the light work they made of arguably the toughest group, either test should only be a formality en route to the quarter-finals.

For Chile, it seems Brazil lie in wait once again. Jorge Sampaoli suggested his team were the only side that wanted to play in Sao Paulo, but he could learn something from Van Gaal pinpointing the most efficient way to win. That should be aided by the return of Arturo Vidal, with Chile looking to justify the hype and avenge their 3-0 defeat to Brazil at the same stage in 2010.

By Matt Stanger in Sao Paulo - follow him on Twitter


http://www.football365.com/faves/9359263/F365-Says
 
I dont have the problem with his mentality. He plays the system that will get him the best possible result. I am convinced that we will play attacking football but if needed, we should be flexible enough to adapt. Otherwise, we get trashed by the top teams like we did last season
 
By and large, I would expect Van Gaal to play attractive football. That been said, if he can do a Mourinho and go to Anfield and get a result then that would be brilliant. Want payback on all these gobbers.
 
By and large, I would expect Van Gaal to play attractive football. That been said, if he can do a Mourinho and go to Anfield and get a result then that would be brilliant. Want payback on all these gobbers.

3-5-2 that is. i think we might see this formation a few times, maybe for the tough away games especially.
 
Welbeck can do what Robben does, he's quick, very mobile and can run at defenders too.. Rooney can play in Sneijder's role in such a formation. Also such a formation would be pefect for our fullbacks.. Rafael and Evra will have so much joy on the wings if we use a 3-5-2..

I don't think welbeck could do what robben does, who robben can not only take on fullbacks, but beat a man with pace. Yes welbeck has pace, but robben is the classic dribbler who is very hard to contain when robben is at full acceleration.
 
but we may have to play 352 at times, as LVG does like 3 man midfield, well atleast 2 holding midfielders with a number 10 which he has got in mata, who is allot like WS. I still think 3 at the back could be a problem, but for LVG to get his system into place, he will need a top class wide player and possibly anothern CB for this to work. But I still feel 3 at the back is pretty risky, but does he want 2 upfront? and 5 in midfield? 2 holding and a number 10, if he does? he may have to play 3 at the back, since we do not have a great deal of depth at the back

Has long as its not 442
 
Has been so impressive this world cup. Waltzed through the toughest group in the draw with a very limited squad by Dutch standards. Has them all pulling together which is a near impossibility usually with Dutch squads. Has shown himself to be pragmatic and adaptable in his tactics and in making the most of the resources he has, even when losing his midfield general to injury. Has set his team up differently in each of the three games, but won them all. Treats the media like shite and generally exudes an air of being in total control. Seems to have snuffed out al these silly transfer leaks emanating from the club too.

Honestly think he could be the difference between 7th and a title challenge. He is everything Moyes wasn't.
 
but we may have to play 352 at times, as LVG does like 3 man midfield, well atleast 2 holding midfielders with a number 10 which he has got in mata, who is allot like WS. I still think 3 at the back could be a problem, but for LVG to get his system into place, he will need a top class wide player and possibly anothern CB for this to work. But I still feel 3 at the back is pretty risky, but does he want 2 upfront? and 5 in midfield? 2 holding and a number 10, if he does? he may have to play 3 at the back, since we do not have a great deal of depth at the back

Has long as its not 442
There's nothing wrong with 442, its how you use it. Louis used it at AZ and it was a very fluid and attacking 442 which ended up winning him the Eredivisie.
 
There's nothing wrong with 442, its how you use it. Louis used it at AZ and it was a very fluid and attacking 442 which ended up winning him the Eredivisie.

We have not got any top class wingers for a 442, and I would rather Valencia nani and young get has little time on the pitch has possible, giving Valencia a new contract still boggles the mind after the way he has played the past 3 years
 
We have not got any top class wingers for a 442, and I would rather Valencia nani and young get has little time on the pitch has possible, giving Valencia a new contract still boggles the mind after the way he has played the past 3 years
We could always play the Atletico Madrid style 442, where the wingers aren't wingers but basically central midfielders who are positioned out wide. That's how they play koke generally, and we did something similar with Hargreaves and Park back in the day.

Signing up Valencia makes sense, he's not been at his best, but he's still performed better than Nani, Young and Kagawa. The latter, only got 3 assists and zero goals last season, and he's supposed to be a shining example in our team.
 
We could always play the Atletico Madrid style 442, where the wingers aren't wingers but basically central midfielders who are positioned out wide. That's how they play koke generally, and we did something similar with Hargreaves and Park back in the day.

Signing up Valencia makes sense, he's not been at his best, but he's still performed better than Nani, Young and Kagawa. The latter, only got 3 assists and zero goals last season, and he's supposed to be a shining example in our team.

Problem with kagwa? You got to build your midfield around him, and he's got to play behind the striker and we have better players in front if him, like Rooney and especially mata. Young and nani are a waist of time and I will be glad to get rid of both, if united can sign a di Maria or a Sanchez

I still think we lack the speed and acceleration to stretch sides, like how di Maria and robben give to Madrid and bayern. Rooney mata janazaj RVP play infront of teams, we need speed to open sides up, we have some ball players, we just need speed and acceleration to come up with something different, to balance out the ball players. United at their best always had a mix of both, we need to regain that again
 
Last edited:
I dont think we will set up with 3 at the back as standard but it will be interesting to see how tactically flexible we are, whether we set up like that for certain games or whether we pick a system like 433 or 4231 and stick to it religiously. I imagine he will want to stick to a particular system until we are properly comfortable with it rather than complicating things by changing things around all the time.

I agree that on paper the 3 at the back system does look well suited to the resources we currently have but I dont think Van Gaal will want to go all in with it.
 
Very well said. If someone has kept their eyes on his career they wouldn't change their rating of him depending on one game against Spain, nor if he had lost against Australia. He is still the same manager, exactly as good/bad.
except he's even more adaptable than before. that needs to be commended imo
 
Criticizing Holland's team for the lack of attacking play while they actually scored what, 10 goals in 3 games is completely mental. Some people just don't get football is all. If have a ball for 60% and just passing it around near center circle that's not attacking.
indeed some call that defending with the ball
 
not so much complain, more a slight disappointment, as i was hoping Van gaal's appointment meant we would play more free flowing attacking football, which we havn't really played regularly since 2009, especially against the big teams.

having said that, it seems to be a very similar philosophy to fergies final years at united, who really became the master of making average player look better by getting the right tactics for the right game, even if that was at the expense of playing attacking football.

so yeah Van Gaal has been incredibly impressive, and all points towards an incredibly bright(the futures orange) future.
as Spain have showed unless you are playing an attacking football style at a very high level, it's not easy to be playing attractive football all the time. Plus with there being short turnaround time between end of domestic season and preparation for WC with warm-up friendlies, it's important that coaches find solutions which they feel gives their team the best chance to win. That's what van Gaal is doing with the Dutch and it makes sense since this is a tournament and it's his last time leading the Dutch national team. So yes, it shouldn't be a surprise if van Gaal is looking to be more pragmatic in this type of environment. It would be silly not to.
 
as Spain have showed unless you are playing an attacking football style at a very high level, it's not easy to be playing attractive football all the time. Plus with there being short turnaround time between end of domestic season and preparation for WC with warm-up friendlies, it's important that coaches find solutions which they feel gives their team the best chance to win. That's what van Gaal is doing with the Dutch and it makes sense since this is a tournament and it's his last time leading the Dutch national team. So yes, it shouldn't be a surprise if van Gaal is looking to be more pragmatic in this type of environment. It would be silly not to.
im not claiming it is easy to do, or that we should do it every game.

but it would be nice to see us come out of the blocks and really attack a big team, instead of our normal stop them playing being our main priority.

but you are right we need to be pragmatic, and our main goal has to be to get back into the CL, but still some attractive football is something i think a lot of united fans(myself included) are desperate for.
 
im not claiming it is easy to do, or that we should do it every game.

but it would be nice to see us come out of the blocks and really attack a big team, instead of our normal stop them playing being our main priority.

but you are right we need to be pragmatic, and our main goal has to be to get back into the CL, but still some attractive football is something i think a lot of united fans(myself included) are desperate for.
I would like to see attacking football too but it also begs the question at what cost? Being pragmatic doesn't necessarily you mean sacrifice attacking football at the same time but it does mean you are willing to do so if that's what's deemed necessary to win. also, sitting deeper and catching teams on the break is a form of attacking football. To some, it may not be as attractive as a more dominant style of attacking.

What I like about LVG is he's not just about attacking but also about establishing a sense of balance within the team. He wants his players to keep their defensive duties in mind while they attack. This is why Holland's defensive transitions have usually been so good. You're not attacking with complete abandon. You're also being aware of what you need to do the instant you lose possession.

this is very important because it's in those initial moments of defensive disorganization where teams can really hurt you on the counterattack. It's also why I think in the initial phase of Holland's defensive setup, at least one player presses the ball carrier immediately. If possession isn't won then retreat to more defensive positions and help maintain overall team defensive shape. I will talk more about this in a thread I made regarding LVG's system
 
except he's even more adaptable than before. that needs to be commended imo

I agree with this and I said it earlier too. I didn't know he had the 5-3-2 in him, he is actually deviating quite a lot not just from his ideal formation but his ideal system with this Holland. A manager known for his offensively dominating style has suddenly shown he also masters a very defensive and reactionary style as well.

But what I am most impressed with is the fact that he seems to have brushed off the issues he previously had where the squad always had some members turn against him. In this Holland everybody seems to absolutely love him and that is a skill he didn't really have before, I am not sure whether it is an improvement he has made or if it is just the fact that the players suit him much more this time.

He has had his troops with him before to later see them turn on him, but the harmony in Holland seem to be the best of all teams in the tournament.
 
I agree with this and I said it earlier too. I didn't know he had the 5-3-2 in him, he is actually deviating quite a lot not just from his ideal formation but his ideal system with this Holland. A manager known for his offensively dominating style has suddenly shown he also masters a very defensive and reactionary style as well.

But what I am most impressed with is the fact that he seems to have brushed off the issues he previously had where the squad always had some members turn against him. In this Holland everybody seems to absolutely love him and that is a skill he didn't really have before, I am not sure whether it is an improvement he has made or if it is just the fact that the players suit him much more this time.

He has had his troops with him before to later see them turn on him, but the harmony in Holland seem to be the best of all teams in the tournament.
This is precisely what I mean. He does like discipline but seems to have learned you can't be too strict with your players otherwise you come across as out of touch. Although, I do think he is helped by the fact he is working with a good number of young players in this squad. He's an expert at working with young players and it's showing once again in the performances of these young Dutchmen. They may not shine as well in club but they've definitely drawn some interest through their performances. That's not easy to do when you're coming up against tough opposition.

You can have a bunch of superstars in your team but if the squad harmony isn't there, I struggle to see how the group will achieve success
 
The Spanish victory was so enjoyable from a United perspective because it was so evident that the match was won on the training ground.

LVG isn't even necessarily a 3-5-2 man, and had spoken openly in the build up about how he thinks it will suit playing the Spanish.

Within 5 minutes I said to my mate 'ah, I can see Holland's plan here. They left Persie, Robben and Sneijder very high up the pitch, and tried to hit them as soon as possible with fast and direct transitions'. Worked to a tee, early balls to Persie and Robben twice all yielded goals. It was a LVG masterclass.

I'm sure the post match analysis has already been done here, so apologies for being a few days late!
here's a post match analysis i wrote if you want to check it out https://www.redcafe.net/threads/a-quick-review-of-lvgs-system.391840/page-4#post-15941777
 
Bq2Van2IYAE0U6c.jpg


An Iconic photo of a young Van Gaal sitting next to his mentor, the father of total football and the most influencial manager to ever live Rinus Michels.
 
This is precisely what I mean. He does like discipline but seems to have learned you can't be too strict with your players otherwise you come across as out of touch. Although, I do think he is helped by the fact he is working with a good number of young players in this squad. He's an expert at working with young players and it's showing once again in the performances of these young Dutchmen. They may not shine as well in club but they've definitely drawn some interest through their performances. That's not easy to do when you're coming up against tough opposition.

You can have a bunch of superstars in your team but if the squad harmony isn't there, I struggle to see how the group will achieve success

Might come with age. Heynckes was known as a coach that had problems with players very often, too - at Bayern he was a diplomate and father figure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.