Carl
has permanently erect nipples
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 45,521

How much money did you have on it at 16/1 then?In the face of doubters, I came up trumps, and I'm going to show off about it forever.
This shows a very dislikeable side to you, Alastair. Nobody likes a blowhard.
You're pathetic.
If he had too much, he could be placing himself in a perilous position. And not due to the risk of losing it.How much money did you have on it at 16/1 then?
Another one? feck me, is there a whopper factory in the newbies?We'll qualify now!![]()
Yeah. My post wasn't at all serious. I thought the tone was pretty obvious.What's so wrong with that in particular? Green smileys in reply to green smileys?
A harmless (and justifiable) little dig is what I see.
We definitely have better whinges here, as your post proves.While Ashley Young, Valencia are United players, just cant have it that Arsenal has better winges than us, something needs to happen.
Yeah. My post wasn't at all serious. I thought the tone was pretty obvious.
Insider knowledge? Horseshit.If he had too much, he could be placing himself in a perilous position. And not due to the risk of losing it.
Insider knowledge? Horseshit.
I think it does. I don't think Alastair has any, though, and if I was as confident about the signing happening as he suggests he was, I'd have had a few quid on at 16/1.Why not? You think that doesn't exist?
Good signing, not exactly a position Arsenal needed to spunk £30m on though. Most certainly means Suarez is on the way to Barcelona. Still think we have the best squad in the league and the best player (when he actually can be arsed). Luis and Costa to come, Courtois to pen a new deal, and if rumours are to be true, Pogba may also be on his way. Not bad!
Maybe now they will come in for Rooney? He would suit them very well, doubt we would sell him to a rival though.
I think it does. I don't think Alastair has any, though, and if I was as confident about the signing happening as he suggests he was, I'd have had a few quid on at 16/1.
I don't think he bet on it, that was my point.It's not necessarily something you "possess", but to which you can gain access occasionally. For betting purposes it's illegal if you have any information that isn't publicly available. He said at the time he knew someone ITK. He got it right. So either he took a 16/1 punt on that thread and lucked out (does he try this often?) or I find it more likely that he was talking the through.
I don't even have any ITK friend, but I do get access to ITK information at times. I've exchanged PMs with another user from here about the Fernando deal 6 months before it happened. I once was told of the exact paraphrasing the President of my club would use in a TV interview that followed that same day. I was stunned with that.
Arsenal have too many of the same positional player now
He did bet a one-week ban. Which isn't illegal. About the money, I don't think he comes across as the sort to confess a crime in a public forum, so we'll never know.I don't think he bet on it, that was my point.
Jesus Christ mateHe did bet a one-week ban. Which isn't illegal.
What's so funny about it?Rooney![]()
Jesus Christ mate. It was an off the cuff remark, based on another guy in this thread throwing £20 on at 16/1 because he thought (or heard) it was happening. So I asked Alastair how much he had on, since he was so convinced. It really didn't need to become a discussion about the legalities of betting on something you "know" the outcome of
![]()
I will mate don't worry.Great signing for them, they still won't challenge for the title though, same bottlers, different year thats all.
It will be us, chelsea and city fighting for 1st,2nd and 3rd, you can quote me on that.
Ok, ok, I got itJesus Christ mate. It was an off the cuff remark, based on another guy in this thread throwing £20 on at 16/1 because he thought (or heard) it was happening. So I asked Alastair how much he had on, since he was so convinced. It really didn't need to become a discussion about the legalities of betting on something you "know" the outcome of
![]()