Archie Leach
Gooner
There are few things more ridiculous than a combined XI to compare squads.
It's totally moronic, I agree.There are few things more ridiculous than a combined XI to compare squads.
No, Wenger will utilise Alexis as a CF.I don't understand.
Theo Walcott tweeted a picture with him and Sanchez saying something like "watch out premier league, me and Sanchez will be a deadly force".
I assumed the two would be competing for a position?
Or is Wenger planning on playing Sanchez LW?
How can you even speculate on an award like that before he's kicked a ball?Quintero would be a fantastic signing for arsenal. A proper playmaker. Would be the young player of the year IMO.
Cause I've seen him kick a ball before?How can you even speculate on an award like that before he's kicked a ball?
Which position is that?Why do people think wenger will use sanchez in a position he's never played before?
That's like someone saying Diego Costa will be Player of the Year this season having never seen him in this league.Cause I've seen him kick a ball before?
Quintero would be a fantastic signing for arsenal. A proper playmaker. Would be the young player of the year IMO.
I'm in Islington on 11th August....any plans for a open-top bus parade if Arsenal will win the Charity Shield???Hopefully we can add a Charity Shield too.
Nah, you can have a punch in the throat if you like.
He turned Robin van Persie into a World Class CF and before that he always used to play on the flanks.Why do people think wenger will use sanchez in a position he's never played before?
Because van persie had qualities useful to strikers. Sanchez has nothing in his game that suggests he could be a quality CF. Kuyt at LB was a waste of time.He turned Robin van Persie into a World Class CF and before that he always used to play on the flanks.
So, why not?
Why do people always think players are locked into one position. Christ, just look at the way Louis van Gaal utilises his players, playing them wherever he needs them to play.
Have you ever seen Kuyt play LB? Or Young play LB?
That's why they are football managers and we are not.
Ozil is really more of an attacker than a playmaker. Quintero would give them better control of games and an ability to play out of tight spaces that they just don't have. Plus his shooting would be a threat to teams that park the bus against them.They don't need him with Ozil in their team. One of the best playmakers in the world
he scored 17 goals last season. Thats a quality a forward needs.Because van persie had qualities useful to strikers. Sanchez has nothing in his game that suggests he could be a quality CF. Kuyt at LB was a waste of time.
As I said, it's a good thing most of us aren't actual football managers, because what you typed there is a load of bs.Because van persie had qualities useful to strikers. Sanchez has nothing in his game that suggests he could be a quality CF. Kuyt at LB was a waste of time.
Because van persie had qualities useful to strikers. Sanchez has nothing in his game that suggests he could be a quality CF. Kuyt at LB was a waste of time.
As I said, it's a good thing most of us aren't actual football managers, because what you typed there is a load of bs.![]()
Yep, Santi, Ramsey, Ozil, Rosicky, Jack are terrible at 'playing out of tight spaces'....Ozil is really more of an attacker than a playmaker. Quintero would give them better control of games and an ability to play out of tight spaces that they just don't have. Plus his shooting would be a threat to teams that park the bus against them.
Santi and jack are their best ones in tight spaces, and they are either injured or not playing in their right positions. Its not that they're terrible as such, they just aren't at the level they need to be to compete for CL's and such.Yep, Santi, Ramsey, Ozil, Rosicky, Jack are terrible at 'playing out of tight spaces'....
Santi and jack are their best ones in tight spaces, and they are either injured or not playing in their right positions. Its not that they're terrible as such, they just aren't at the level they need to be to compete for CL's and such.
What's wrong in that post?I'm guessing you don't watch Arsenal very much.
He's never been a striker for either. He's either on the wing or behind the striker.A quality stiker like he was at Udinese or for Chile?
Van persie has the size and strength to deal with Center backs. Sanchez doesn't handle contact all too well.As I said, it's a good thing most of us aren't actual football managers, because what you typed there is a load of bs.![]()
Van persie has the size and strength to deal with Center backs. Sanchez doesn't handle contact all too well.
Kuyt at left back is one of the most pointless moves I've seen a coach make, there was absolutely nothing genius about it. He doesn't have a left foot and reverted to cutting back and passing the center backs most of the time.
Glass legs handles contact fantastically, as his injury career has shown to us.
A sturdy, boxy, square Sanchez is obviously not suited to the English hard men, let alone playing him as a CF on a cold Monday winter night at Stoke.
By your definition of a striker, Suarez should also have failed miserably as he is size-wise very similar to Sanchez. However, he absolutely ripped this league to bits with his 31 goals, 12 assists and teeth.
For the love of the Universe stop babbling. You clearly don't know what you're talking about.
He's never been a striker for either. He's either on the wing or behind the striker.
He turned Robin van Persie into a World Class CF and before that he always used to play on the flanks.
So, why not?
Why do people always think players are locked into one position. Christ, just look at the way Louis van Gaal utilises his players, playing them wherever he needs them to play.
Have you ever seen Kuyt play LB? Or Young play LB?
That's why they are football managers and we are not.