Castia
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 18,647
I'd love him back but I can't get over the thought of a player leaving for free then resigning him for upwards of £60m, it's absolutely ridiculous.
And a younger player is typically on lower wages. I cannot see any reason to prevent us from buying him.
You spoke mostly sense, but if you think we're going to spend upwards of 50m on Pogba and not give him a contract of at least 200k+ a week, then you'd be living in fantasy land. Pogba would probably be our 5th highest earner if he signed (behind Falcao, Rooney, Van Persie and Di Maria -- maybe Mata too).
You spoke mostly sense, but if you think we're going to spend upwards of 50m on Pogba and not give him a contract of at least 200k+ a week, then you'd be living in fantasy land. Pogba would probably be our 5th highest earner if he signed (behind Falcao, Rooney, Van Persie and Di Maria -- maybe Mata too).
Dropped 150 million in the summer including on a 20 mill loan player struggling to bed in. Now looking to rehire an ex player for 60. You dont see a pattern of madness emerging here?The fact that we 'sold' him for nothing is irrelevant now. Sunk cost and all that. He's a Juve player, he's a great player and if we can get him, we should.
If he wasn't an ex player and you just saw him for the player he was, would you think he would be a good signing?Dropped 150 million in the summer including on a 20 mill loan player struggling to bed in. Now looking to rehire an ex player for 60. You dont see a pattern of madness emerging here?
Why bother? It's not your money.I'd love him back but I can't get over the thought of a player leaving for free then resigning him for upwards of £60m, it's absolutely ridiculous.
Dropped 150 million in the summer including on a 20 mill loan player struggling to bed in. Now looking to rehire an ex player for 60. You dont see a pattern of madness emerging here?
So at what point does cynical disaffection trump any last vestiges of a love for the game? If you can answer "never" to that question, you might want to check the way you were raised.Madness descended on the English prem some time ago. We dropped 30m on Berbatov, a sum which seems like chump change now. 27.5m for Fellaini last year.
I know this is complete bullshit, but the rumor that Adidas will help us spend 200m on Messi has not yet died. But if that comes to pass, it's going to redefine madness.
Obviously we'll look like idiots if we're gonna sign him for a large fee, but we need to swallow our pride and do it. This guy is only 21 and already a complete midfielder and one of the best in the world and he will be at the top for the next 10 years at least.
We won't look like idiots for buying him back for £60million, we are already idiots for letting him go for nothing![]()
The fact of the matter is that he is obviously not available in January apart from in muppets dreams.....Juve obviously will not sell their best player in January when they are odds on to win the league again and also they will get mroe money for him in the summer when the bidding war takes place...He obviously will chose Real Madrid or PSG ahead of us. The smart money would be on him going to Real in the summer but Man City have a great chance of getting him with the Viera influence. Raiola the fat mafia wannabe will use us to get Pogba a better deal elsewhereRival fans will probably laugh, but as soon as Pogba improves United they will no longer laugh. I just don't care about the previous history. If he's available, United should try.
I really could give no fecks if we look like idiots because we sign Pogba. We sign Pogba and our midfield has the potential to be the strongest in the Prem, and one of the best in Europe. That's what I care about, now what opposition fans say.
True, and furthermore, losing Pogba was actually a rare Fergie mistake, not a Woodward one. So bringing him back would hardly make Woody look bad; if anything, it would make him look decisive.If he wasn't an ex player and you just saw him for the player he was, would you think he would be a good signing?
The whole let him go for nothing and spending huge money to get him back, while it looks bad, means absolutely nothing. Spending 80 million on Pogba, is the same as spending 80 million on any other player.
Yeh, I think van Gaal and Woodward would actually thrive on making this signing and really putting their own stamp on the club.True, and furthermore, losing Pogba was actually a rare Fergie mistake, not a Woodward one. So bringing him back would hardly make Woody look bad; if anything, it would make him look decisive.
this , he made a 60m improvement at juve? united have some dozy tw4ts running the show.
This is quite interesting that so many people would take him back, even though it would require a big fee and we would look like fools all things considered.
That said, I would take him too.
Yep that Fergie was a right idiot.......
No chance the media will let it go if we bring him back for £60 million, we're a completely different beast to Chelsea. Of course if we win the league we won't care.Same with Chelsea and Matic. No one is complaining there now, as it's worked perfectly! At the end of the day, if we go on to win title after title after buying him back for £60 million then no one will say it was bad buisness by us.
Barcelona did it with Fabregas, that's the most recent example I can think of. His return was not seen as a shame, but rather romantically.
No chance the media will let it go if we bring him back for £60 million, we're a completely different beast to Chelsea. Of course if we win the league we won't care.
on the subject of a midfield dynamo he was. went for TC23 , that was f@@king idiotic and we will now pay 60m quid if he wants to come here to get someone we already fecking had. that was a massive fuc4 up. now two midfs will go out on frees because no ones paying for the brand.. he bought a grand total of 3 good midfs his whole time here - ince and keano which was a long time ago and carrick which was almost 10 yrs ago the rest were sh1t. TC23 over pogba , stevie wonder could see that fuc4 up.
No chance the media will let it go if we bring him back for £60 million, we're a completely different beast to Chelsea. Of course if we win the league we won't care.
No chance the media will let it go if we bring him back for £60 million, we're a completely different beast to Chelsea. Of course if we win the league we won't care.
Yep. I say bring him back, whatever the cost and screw what anyone has to say on the matter.You think the media will rest quiet if Pogba joins Chelsea and wins things with them? We'd be taken to the cleaners anyways for letting go of such a player who then joined and won things with a direct rival. Rather be called idiots with Pogba than without him. Who gives a feck anyways.
Oh I couldn't give a shit, I'd welcome him back with open arms. Just saying the press will definitely slate us, we're more of a news piece than Chelsea.You think the media will rest quiet if Pogba joins Chelsea and wins things with them? We'd be taken to the cleaners anyways for letting go of such a player who then joined and won things with a direct rival. Rather be called idiots with Pogba than without him. Who gives a feck anyways.
Oh I couldn't give a shit, I'd welcome him back with open arms. Just saying the press will definitely slate us, we're more of a news piece than Chelsea.
Well we'll look 'bad' if we sign him for 60M and we win stuff, really, it was just very bad business on our part. I don't mind, though, and I don't think a few articles in the media should deter us from going after him.The only way it can look bad is if we buy him for £60million and for some reason he doesn't work (like a Veron) and we end up selling him for a huge loss.