Because this never happened in politicsSo what, all traces of it were erased from the earth? That's convenient![]()
Because this never happened in politicsSo what, all traces of it were erased from the earth? That's convenient![]()
NOOO what ;(Uh oh, no one tell him what happens in private schools.
Because this never happened in politics![]()
Well my kids are going into private school so this is sorted already![]()
Again, when the law in 2011 was denied the people who were behind against campaign gaved LGBT activist an offer of a new law with all the rights (which most of them they already have) without the kids part. The LGBT didn't accept the offer started looking how they could again accept the same law as soon as possible which they did in 2013 i think it was or in 2014.Ah here. Come on and stop the nonsense now. Perhaps you don't realise how daft you're sounding.
Edit: So... if it never happened, how are DE GAYS to blame for nothing happening?![]()
So hypothetically speaking @Jerch, if it did become legal for same sex couples to adopt in Slovenia and then one of your sons turned out to be gay, found a partner and said to you 'dad we want to raise a child, do you think we should adopt?', your response would be 'nah, you'll never be as good as any other random heterosexual couple, forget it and think of the children'.
Seems like sound advice there.
According to a study from the National Bureau of Economic Research, about 20 percent of the population is attracted to their own gender.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...e-than-you-think-5012467/#ZMqAtwSb5RvO3Fdt.99
Yep.So hypothetically speaking @Jerch, if it did become legal for same sex couples to adopt in Slovenia and then one of your sons turned out to be gay, found a partner and said to you 'dad we want to raise a child, do you think we should adopt?', your response would be 'nah, you'll never be as good as any other random heterosexual couple, forget it and think of the children'.
Seems like sound advice there.
Again, when the law in 2011 was denied the people who were behind against campaign gaved LGBT activist an offer of a new law with all the rights (which most of them they already have) without the kids part. The LGBT didn't accept the offer started looking how they could again accept the same law as soon as possible which they did in 2013 i think it was or in 2014.
Yep.
Wow. Stone cold. There it is. "Son, you are not as good as any random straight couple".
Well clearly his son would be the one at fault anyway...not the Hetero parents that raised him. They can do no wrong. Not like those yucky gays and their yucky child raising methods.
Remember, Freud said something once. And there was that one article about something too.
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."Wow. Stone cold. There it is. "Son, you are not as good as any random straight couple".
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."
"You're an arsehole, dad."No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."
"You're an arsehole, dad."
"Let's go on holidays with the other grandparents "
What if your son decided he was a woman trapped in a mans body and had a change? Could he fill the mothers role then?
"He just doesn't want to spend extra money on Father's Day gifts"
I am not offensive, i give my opinion and i never insulted anyone in this thread. Same can't be said other way.In all seriousness, someone was arguing with me about a month or two back saying that we should close the thread on Islam because it was offensive. Well, I'd argue that the views and rhetoric being espoused by Jerch here are a damn sight more offensive that almost anything that was posted in there. But at the same time, it's important for people like him to be able to express themselves so that those ideas can be shown up for the absolute nonsense they are. I'm sure they'll be people reading this nodding in agreement with every word he says, but if the arguments are allowed to stand or fall on their own merits then hopefully some people might give it a re-think. It's happened before and it'll happen again I'm sure.
I am not offensive, i give my opinion and i never insulted anyone in this thread. Same can't be said other way.
No i gaved my opinion on the subject. That kid needs mother and father and that father can't replace the mother...You called your hypothetical son a second class human. You have no conception of how insulting your views are which makes you the worst of homophobes. You dehumanise others.
So who has kids. Or do i speak with a bunch of duds who think they are extra modern and something like that?
No i gaved my opinion on the subject. That kid needs mother and father and that father can't replace the mother...
Kids need clothes, food, water, somewhere warm to sleep and people to give them attention. Everything else is surplus to requirements.No i gaved my opinion on the subject. That kid needs mother and father and that father can't replace the mother...
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."
edit: i don't know how is that so hard to understand. Didn't you have a mother and a father? And if you do, do you really think that having two fathers or two mothers will gave you the same environment. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT?
I don't have anything against gay's or lesbian's, one could be a great father, the other could be a great mother. But kid needs both. I am not saying :"you are gay you can't know how to raise a child" or "you are not able to be a father".
I am not offensive, i give my opinion and i never insulted anyone in this thread. Same can't be said other way.
I don't hate anyone. Never said so. I just said that if you have a kid you will saw what kid needs. For example I am all the time with the kids because my wife usually work afternoon shift, we play and everything, even if my wife is at home they usually rather play with me because i often have more energy and patience for it.What exactly are you trying to prove by moving the goalposts again? That it's OK to hate Gays because you're a dad?
Double_facepalmKids need clothes, food, water, somewhere warm to sleep and people to give them attention. Everything else is surplus to requirements.
I'd rather be brought up by Elton John than Jerch.
I don't hate anyone. Never said so. I just said that if you have a kid you will saw what kid needs. For example I am all the time with the kids because my wife usually work afternoon shift, we play and everything, even if my wife is at home they usually rather play with me because i often have more energy and patience for it.
But when it comes to bad time I am never good enough and they always have to go to bad with my wife. Am I second class human because my kid rather go to sleep with my wife then with me. No it is something natural, a natural bond between the mother and a kid which a father and a kid never can have.
Other example is that even if my wife is more strict, when they are really not in the mood to listen they will never calmed down even if she screams as much as she can, but they calm down when I threatened with the punishment (no TV or toys).
This is just an example, there are many more but the point is, if you have a kid you see that he really needs father and a mother.
I'd even take fecking Liverpool if it meant not being raised by Jerch.But... you would probably have ended up supporting Watford rather than United though.
Actually, that's extremely offensive to Watford fans. Apologies.
You called your hypothetical son a second class human. You have no conception of how insulting your views are which makes you the worst of homophobes. You dehumanise others.
To be fair to Jerch, he's probably not the most offensive poster in this thread. That would go to @McUnited, who earlier posted about people marrying animals after I made the interracial comparison on one of the early pages.