Gay Marriage

So hypothetically speaking @Jerch, if it did become legal for same sex couples to adopt in Slovenia and then one of your sons turned out to be gay, found a partner and said to you 'dad we want to raise a child, do you think we should adopt?', your response would be 'nah, you'll never be as good as any other random heterosexual couple, forget it and think of the children'.

Seems like sound advice there.
 
Ah here. Come on and stop the nonsense now. Perhaps you don't realise how daft you're sounding.

Edit: So... if it never happened, how are DE GAYS to blame for nothing happening? :rolleyes:
Again, when the law in 2011 was denied the people who were behind against campaign gaved LGBT activist an offer of a new law with all the rights (which most of them they already have) without the kids part. The LGBT didn't accept the offer started looking how they could again accept the same law as soon as possible which they did in 2013 i think it was or in 2014.
 
So hypothetically speaking @Jerch, if it did become legal for same sex couples to adopt in Slovenia and then one of your sons turned out to be gay, found a partner and said to you 'dad we want to raise a child, do you think we should adopt?', your response would be 'nah, you'll never be as good as any other random heterosexual couple, forget it and think of the children'.

Seems like sound advice there.

Nah, sure that could never happen to him or anyone he knows.
 
So hypothetically speaking @Jerch, if it did become legal for same sex couples to adopt in Slovenia and then one of your sons turned out to be gay, found a partner and said to you 'dad we want to raise a child, do you think we should adopt?', your response would be 'nah, you'll never be as good as any other random heterosexual couple, forget it and think of the children'.

Seems like sound advice there.
Yep.
 
Again, when the law in 2011 was denied the people who were behind against campaign gaved LGBT activist an offer of a new law with all the rights (which most of them they already have) without the kids part. The LGBT didn't accept the offer started looking how they could again accept the same law as soon as possible which they did in 2013 i think it was or in 2014.

Prove it.

And like I say, the 2014 law was passed.

Edit: Ah, I get it now. It was passed, but the opposition collected enough signatures to get a referendum to deny it. Still looking for your proof about DE GAYS though.
 
Wow. Stone cold. There it is. "Son, you are not as good as any random straight couple".

Well clearly his son would be the one at fault anyway...not the Hetero parents that raised him. They can do no wrong. Not like those yucky gays and their yucky child raising methods.

Remember, Freud said something once. And there was that one article about something too.
 
Well clearly his son would be the one at fault anyway...not the Hetero parents that raised him. They can do no wrong. Not like those yucky gays and their yucky child raising methods.

Remember, Freud said something once. And there was that one article about something too.

And there were real facts in that article, maybe.
 
Wow. Stone cold. There it is. "Son, you are not as good as any random straight couple".
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."

edit: i don't know how is that so hard to understand. Didn't you have a mother and a father? And if you do, do you really think that having two fathers or two mothers will gave you the same environment. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT?

I don't have anything against gay's or lesbian's, one could be a great father, the other could be a great mother. But kid needs both. I am not saying :"you are gay you can't know how to raise a child" or "you are not able to be a father".
 
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."

I.e., you are a second class human.
 
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."
"You're an arsehole, dad."
 
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but you noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."

What if your son decided he was a woman trapped in a mans body and had a change? Could he fill the mothers role then?
 
In all seriousness, someone was arguing with me about a month or two back saying that we should close the thread on Islam because it was offensive. Well, I'd argue that the views and rhetoric being espoused by Jerch here are a damn sight more offensive that almost anything that was posted in there. But at the same time, it's important for people like him to be able to express themselves so that those ideas can be shown up for the absolute nonsense they are. I'm sure they'll be people reading this nodding in agreement with every word he says, but if the arguments are allowed to stand or fall on their own merits then hopefully some people might give it a re-think. It's happened before and it'll happen again I'm sure.
 
And here we go again with the insults. Ok who of you have a child? That i will know how much can you know about raising a child.
 
In all seriousness, someone was arguing with me about a month or two back saying that we should close the thread on Islam because it was offensive. Well, I'd argue that the views and rhetoric being espoused by Jerch here are a damn sight more offensive that almost anything that was posted in there. But at the same time, it's important for people like him to be able to express themselves so that those ideas can be shown up for the absolute nonsense they are. I'm sure they'll be people reading this nodding in agreement with every word he says, but if the arguments are allowed to stand or fall on their own merits then hopefully some people might give it a re-think. It's happened before and it'll happen again I'm sure.
I am not offensive, i give my opinion and i never insulted anyone in this thread. Same can't be said other way.
 
So who has kids. Or do i speak with a bunch of duds who think they are extra modern and something like that?
 
You called your hypothetical son a second class human. You have no conception of how insulting your views are which makes you the worst of homophobes. You dehumanise others.
No i gaved my opinion on the subject. That kid needs mother and father and that father can't replace the mother...
 
No i gaved my opinion on the subject. That kid needs mother and father and that father can't replace the mother...

No, what Amethyst said was did you think he would be a worse parent than any other random straight couple.

Who could be criminals, paedophiles, drug addicts.. You said yes, your son would be worse.
 
No, "Look son, you or your partner could be a great fathers but noone of you can be a mother and for kid's best he should have a father and a mather. It is your choice if you will adopt a kid but I don't think you two could be a perfect family for him."

edit: i don't know how is that so hard to understand. Didn't you have a mother and a father? And if you do, do you really think that having two fathers or two mothers will gave you the same environment. DO YOU REALLY BELIEVE THAT?

I don't have anything against gay's or lesbian's, one could be a great father, the other could be a great mother. But kid needs both. I am not saying :"you are gay you can't know how to raise a child" or "you are not able to be a father".

As has been said, the number of children who are raised by either single parents or adopted (straight or gay) parents and are perfectly happy, contributing members of society shows that it's not absolutely necessary for the parents to be of each gender/sex. And those that have your so called optimal upbringing of a mother and a father get their morals and life lessons from a wider range of people such as teachers, friends, relatives and more.

I am not offensive, i give my opinion and i never insulted anyone in this thread. Same can't be said other way.

Personally I'm not offended by what you've said, but if I was gay and was reading this being told that you're a second class citizen solely because of your orientation I might be.
 
What exactly are you trying to prove by moving the goalposts again? That it's OK to hate Gays because you're a dad?
I don't hate anyone. Never said so. I just said that if you have a kid you will saw what kid needs. For example I am all the time with the kids because my wife usually work afternoon shift, we play and everything, even if my wife is at home they usually rather play with me because i often have more energy and patience for it.
But when it comes to bad time I am never good enough and they always have to go to bad with my wife. Am I second class human because my kid rather go to sleep with my wife then with me. No it is something natural, a natural bond between the mother and a kid which a father and a kid never can have.
Other example is that even if my wife is more strict, when they are really not in the mood to listen they will never calmed down even if she screams as much as she can, but they calm down when I threatened with the punishment (no TV or toys).

This is just an example, there are many more but the point is, if you have a kid you see that he really needs father and a mother.
 
I don't hate anyone. Never said so. I just said that if you have a kid you will saw what kid needs. For example I am all the time with the kids because my wife usually work afternoon shift, we play and everything, even if my wife is at home they usually rather play with me because i often have more energy and patience for it.
But when it comes to bad time I am never good enough and they always have to go to bad with my wife. Am I second class human because my kid rather go to sleep with my wife then with me. No it is something natural, a natural bond between the mother and a kid which a father and a kid never can have.
Other example is that even if my wife is more strict, when they are really not in the mood to listen they will never calmed down even if she screams as much as she can, but they calm down when I threatened with the punishment (no TV or toys).

This is just an example, there are many more but the point is, if you have a kid you see that he really needs father and a mother.

So, if I could find one family in the whole world where the roles were the opposite to your family, would it change your mind?
 
You called your hypothetical son a second class human. You have no conception of how insulting your views are which makes you the worst of homophobes. You dehumanise others.

To be fair to Jerch, he's probably not the most offensive poster in this thread. That would go to @McUnited, who earlier posted about people marrying animals after I made the interracial comparison on one of the early pages.