When a financial takeover is the only reason your team has become relevant, yet you bash other teams for spending money that was actually earnt.
Bluemoon goes into Meltdown
- Thread starter Logan!
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
When a financial takeover is the only reason your team has become relevant, yet you bash other teams for spending money that was actually earnt.
It just makes no fecking sense. Bitter hypocritical cnuts.What I find absolutely incredible about all of this is they genuinely think they are on a level playing field to us in world football and renown.
I mean they have done well recently and have some good players but youd think theyve won the league the last 10 years in a row. We have 20 league titles and they have 4? Or 3? We also have 3 Champions League titles they have never ever come even close. Its incredible really the amount of shite they come up with. "Irrelevant" haha its incredible.
Not even the worst of the worst Chelsea fans back in the Jose good days were like this. They would say "were going to win it" and be beligirant about it. Whereas these deluded feckwits think theyve won it already. Amazing.
I mean they have done well recently and have some good players but youd think theyve won the league the last 10 years in a row. We have 20 league titles and they have 4? Or 3? We also have 3 Champions League titles they have never ever come even close. Its incredible really the amount of shite they come up with. "Irrelevant" haha its incredible.
Not even the worst of the worst Chelsea fans back in the Jose good days were like this. They would say "were going to win it" and be beligirant about it. Whereas these deluded feckwits think theyve won it already. Amazing.
City spending some money the club never made, nothing new.
If you repeat a mantra often enough, if becomes fact. Honestly that forum is like Jonestown, they validate and enable each other constantly with RAWKish delusion. I do take a sick pleasure in reading, always great for a laugh.
They. Are. Worried.
Gutted the Pogba megathread is gone.
The salt tastes so sweet
Here is the original Pogba thread which has mysteriously vanished, thank goodness for internet archiving:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150709010028/http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/pogba.292054/
https://web.archive.org/web/20150709010028/http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/pogba.292054/
@Xeno @VanGaalEra See above ^
My mission is to go through this thread, extract as many different quotes and then crosscheck against the same use users saying he's shit, overpriced and will fail.
Unfortunately, not all of the pages have been archived intact.
Good work sir
Does anyone know this guy??? He obviously doesn't know how Bluemoon works and how receptive they are to the 'rags' on their forum. Be interesting to see the type of hypocritical responses he gets.
"Are there any Utd. fans who post in here, who are also active on Red Cafe? If so, can you tell me what the heck that site is site playing at??? I have been banned, yet again and I didn't do anything wrong?
I joined yesterday and made a harmless comment on a thread about Wayne Rooney. Today I started a thread about Fellaini possibly going to Sunderland and that initiated a decent and funny debate. I acknowledged I was a City suppoerter, I filled in a thing on the new posters thread saying I was born in Manchester and will always be a City fan but I expect this season to be amazing and wanted to discuss it with them, etc. etc. They claim to welcome City fans so I don't think that was the issue.
Tonight, I had spent about 30 mins on a detailed post - again about Wayne Rooney and how I think he would be best off going to Everton - probably at the end of this year. But when I tried to submit it, I got this message - "Error, you have been banned".
I'm really annoyed because on that site, once you are banned, you cannot get onto a whole section of the forums, the 'Newbie section', so now I can't even see how the discussion on my Fellaini thread pans out.
Is this not a breach of my human rights!
I thought this country was one where free-speech prevailed?
If there are any techies out there, I'd also appreciate your input on how this happened. I did, thinking back, sign up last night whilst having a beer in my local. My tablet was on the Pub's wi-fi so, I assume it was a new IP address, not known to Red Cafe. The e-mail I used was also 'new'.
However, today, I created the Fellaini thread on my home PC - did that cross-reference my IP address to one on a database of banned ones, or what? I just think people should be given chances. Did they send me a message saying that I must be careful and post respectfully (which I intended to do)? No just a straight ban. Grrr its really annoyed me.
P.S. Just to add, the last time I was banned, I think it was because I dared to suggest that Marcus Rojo was a bad purchase, because a) they had to pay Nani's wages for a year to get him, b) because he had legal problems back in South America, meaning he was late joining Utd. and finally c) because he isn't very good. Ironically, according to the papers today, Utd. are probably going to sell Rojo, because..... he isn't very good!
I think my ban before that - and I can understand this one, was because I dared to criticise the holy of holys: SAF. I wrote a post saying that although he built up an empire, his actions, particularly over a race horse (Rock of Gibralta) ultimately led to the Glazer takeover & Utd's decline.... I can see why that annoyed them! But I think people should be given chances and the people running Red Cafe seem just too harsh."
"Are there any Utd. fans who post in here, who are also active on Red Cafe? If so, can you tell me what the heck that site is site playing at??? I have been banned, yet again and I didn't do anything wrong?
I joined yesterday and made a harmless comment on a thread about Wayne Rooney. Today I started a thread about Fellaini possibly going to Sunderland and that initiated a decent and funny debate. I acknowledged I was a City suppoerter, I filled in a thing on the new posters thread saying I was born in Manchester and will always be a City fan but I expect this season to be amazing and wanted to discuss it with them, etc. etc. They claim to welcome City fans so I don't think that was the issue.
Tonight, I had spent about 30 mins on a detailed post - again about Wayne Rooney and how I think he would be best off going to Everton - probably at the end of this year. But when I tried to submit it, I got this message - "Error, you have been banned".
I'm really annoyed because on that site, once you are banned, you cannot get onto a whole section of the forums, the 'Newbie section', so now I can't even see how the discussion on my Fellaini thread pans out.
Is this not a breach of my human rights!
I thought this country was one where free-speech prevailed?
If there are any techies out there, I'd also appreciate your input on how this happened. I did, thinking back, sign up last night whilst having a beer in my local. My tablet was on the Pub's wi-fi so, I assume it was a new IP address, not known to Red Cafe. The e-mail I used was also 'new'.
However, today, I created the Fellaini thread on my home PC - did that cross-reference my IP address to one on a database of banned ones, or what? I just think people should be given chances. Did they send me a message saying that I must be careful and post respectfully (which I intended to do)? No just a straight ban. Grrr its really annoyed me.
P.S. Just to add, the last time I was banned, I think it was because I dared to suggest that Marcus Rojo was a bad purchase, because a) they had to pay Nani's wages for a year to get him, b) because he had legal problems back in South America, meaning he was late joining Utd. and finally c) because he isn't very good. Ironically, according to the papers today, Utd. are probably going to sell Rojo, because..... he isn't very good!
I think my ban before that - and I can understand this one, was because I dared to criticise the holy of holys: SAF. I wrote a post saying that although he built up an empire, his actions, particularly over a race horse (Rock of Gibralta) ultimately led to the Glazer takeover & Utd's decline.... I can see why that annoyed them! But I think people should be given chances and the people running Red Cafe seem just too harsh."
That's a lot of effort and words to essentially say I'm butthurt because an Internet forum sidnt like me.
So that paragraph at the bottom seals it, can't have multiple accounts or sign up with a new e-mail, the IP check is usually what gets them if I know my Caf onions.
So if you are reading this disgruntled City fan, we have your kind here with us, along with other oppo fans who are perfectly welcome, but you were obviously a dickhead at some point and you can't just keep joining up after that.
When the ESPN article was released yesterday and after Zidane's quotes:
AND TODAY!
Maybe I'm wrong but Woodward only tends to land big name players nobody else want, aka Di Maria and Falcao. Now Madrid want Pogba
its started
Real Madrid make contact with Juventus over Paul Pogba - sources
"Some among the United hierarchy even suspect Pogba may be "stalling them" to see if Real Madrid come in with an official bid."
"
Sources say both the club and Jose Mourinho believe they have done all they can, however, and have even considered setting a deadline for the deal to be done or else walking away.
There has long been a suspicion Pogba is still holding out for his first choice and Real finally acted on that in the last 48 hours by making contact with Juventus."
AND TODAY!
Do they purposely try and type like they are illiterate, or is that just the swagger that comes along with supporting a club that's biggest achievement ever is prostituting themselves in the hope that some rich investor could have changed their fortunes? They went from minnow club with no money, to minnow club with lots of money.
City and Liverpool fans are taking this pretty poorly.
Have some dignity for goodness sake.
'Desperate' seems to the new byword for 'United are doing something ambitious that I don't like'
Have some dignity for goodness sake.
'Desperate' seems to the new byword for 'United are doing something ambitious that I don't like'
Least self-aware comment ever?
To be fair there were a few Bluemooners who were giving props to United and acknowledging that we're going to be a force to be reckoned with and that we have done well this transfer window....but it didn't last very long.
http://forums.bluemoon-mcfc.co.uk/threads/new-beckham-ad-by-sky-sports.323246/
It's almost a parody of their fanbase
Rashford scoring five at the Etihad though
It's almost a parody of their fanbase
Rashford scoring five at the Etihad though
Exactly. City fans are small time bitters, Liverpool fans are deluded stuck-in-the-past people (not saying all the fans of both time are respectively like these descriptions, but certainly all those on Bluemoon and RAWK), and they're just butthurt and jealous over Pogba. They're trying to convince themselves that it's a bad deal, that Real will get him instead, that he's shit, etc, and a whole lot of over stupid shit like it.
Man, it actually feels great. You can taste the salt and feel the jealousy.
http://sportwitness.co.uk/marca-juve-agreed-pogba-sale-manchester-city-player-vetoed/
Marca: Juve agreed Pogba sale with Manchester City, but player vetoed it
They also point out that Manchester City agreed a deal with Juventus to buy the player last August, but Pogba himself turned the opportunity down.
He didn’t want to move at the end of a transfer window, and was waiting for further opportunities this summer.
Marca: Juve agreed Pogba sale with Manchester City, but player vetoed it
They also point out that Manchester City agreed a deal with Juventus to buy the player last August, but Pogba himself turned the opportunity down.
He didn’t want to move at the end of a transfer window, and was waiting for further opportunities this summer.
Haha do you know what that was in response to?
I'd just copied that one to quote it. It's incredible.
Haha yeah i see now, read it quickly and thought it was just two random quotes. Doh!
If that is true, then there is nothing there that would illicit a ban from this site, suggests that what he actually did was markedly different. Probably on a WUM.
Verratti the only one in that list that you can really say that of. The rest havent shown enough just yet.
A year ago both Weigl and Dahoud were promising prospects at best. Now they are clearly on a level with Pogba.
Multiple times returnee, definitely reason on it's own to be banned. Considering he's repeatedly been banned though, I'm sure he's done more than that each time.
No idea why City would be when their team is so good anyway. They have at 3 players I would argue are better than Pogba. Maybe they had plans of getting him for themselves. Pretty sure they were linked to him last summer.
Liverpool on the other hand I get. They're pretty much an irrelevance in the PL now and this just makes the gap between them and those they'll hope to be battling with for Euro spots even bigger.
edit: And City fans can't talk shit about any transfer fee after what they spend on Sterling.
A quick search tells me his name was 'peacefulcityfan'