Rado_N
Yaaas Broncos!
I don't know what's worse, the fact that someone wrote a goddam poem or that the shirt sales myth has sprung up again.
Boom!Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
So it's not even a world record after all things considered. 92m total fees with 84m to Juventus and 8m to Raiola.
Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
How many shirts do we have to sell to pay off the debt? Is it doable?
We sell a pretty consistent number of shirts each year. The number of people who will buy a Pogba shirt who wouldn't normally have bought one at all will be incredibly small and our share of any profit on that number of shorts entirely inconsequential.Don't know why the shirt sales thing is taken as a myth. We had no share percentage in the Nike deal but the Adidas deal is radically different. It'll make a minimal difference but it'll be a difference.
Unless somebody gets sold and he snatches their number.Are we confident enough yet to pre order No.6 Pogba shirts?
Which commercial? Could you tag it here?
Posted so many times by now, but honestly this comp is![]()
On the subject of the Adidas advert.... It was probably filmed way before the euros. However the only link to us being the banner and the clip of OT. It would have taken about an hour to edit those parts in. It was probably filmed with the Juve brand included originally.
Even if the club got 100% of the cost of a shirt you would need to sell 2 million €60 shirts to make back the cost of the transfer and according to this article 2 million is the number of shirts we sold in 13/14.Don't know why the shirt sales thing is taken as a myth. We had no share percentage in the Nike deal but the Adidas deal is radically different. It'll make a minimal difference but it'll be a difference.
Even if the club got 100% of the cost of a shirt you would need to sell 2 million €60 shirts to make back the cost of the transfer and according to this article 2 million is the number of shirts we sold in 13/14.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-disastrous-campaign-under-david-9722715.html
Pogba would not be on the back of all shirts and we do not get 100% of the cost of the shirt so its unlikely that replica sales will have much of an impact.
Yes, we get a % off the Adidas sales. We also get to keep majority of the profits when the merchandise is sold through United channels (ie Megastore etc).I know as I said the difference will be minimal but it's still better than under Nike where we used to get nothing.
Posted so many times by now, but honestly this comp is![]()
@Acquire Me was ITK about this that Juve will negotiate regarding Pogba and the club has already made a bid and that, this deal will eventually be done.
All of this well in advance and a lot of people called out on him but all of his statements are eventually turning true
We said in advance, if this happens then he will be our hero and although it hasn't happened as yet but I just wanted to thank him before this thread closes
Ya but as someone here mentioned, we 'make back' this money in the sponsorships we're able to negotiate. No doubt adidas were told we will make massive signings. And lo and behold, adidas new face becomes available and is the perfect fit to our team. You couldn't make this shit up. Win win for both us and adidas for years to come.Even if the club got 100% of the cost of a shirt you would need to sell 2 million €60 shirts to make back the cost of the transfer and according to this article 2 million is the number of shirts we sold in 13/14.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-disastrous-campaign-under-david-9722715.html
Pogba would not be on the back of all shirts and we do not get 100% of the cost of the shirt so its unlikely that replica sales will have much of an impact.
I never watch compilation videos but just watched this...Bloody hell!. Overrated/overpriced my arse. If not for poor/casual finishing feck knows how many assists he could have ended up with.
I noted a few things though
1. We'll need better attacking players than Darmian/Val to make something out of those cross field passes
2. His combination with Evra on that left wing was glorious, can he do that with our left backs?
Shocker is he not here yetInteresting to see how much brown stuff splats the fan when he's still not here tomorrow either
![]()
Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
The fees have been worked out between Juventus and Manchester United for Paul Pogba. Pogba, who will move to the Premier League will now the player linked to the highest transfer fee of all time, about €110m. The fee to Juventus will be slightly lower than the amount reported in the last few days, as Pogba's agent Raiola's fees had to be taken into account as well. Juventus' receipt should net slightly over €100m, representing a huge payday for the Italian club who landed Pogba from United four years ago for nothing. As for Raiola's commission, that will be paid by United. All together, the gross amount of the transfer is €110m, higher than that paid for any transfer before, with final details of all the fees to be released in a few hours with a release issued by Juventus.
Provisional squad numbers given show no.6 as being vacant.Unless somebody gets sold and he snatches their number.
We sell a pretty consistent number of shirts each year. The number of people who will buy a Pogba shirt who wouldn't normally have bought one at all will be incredibly small and our share of any profit on that number of shorts entirely inconsequential.
Di Marzio figures don't add up. The Barca figures wrong now were they? Oh please do provide me the source that shows its wrong?Let's see what they announce at their GM. Also lets see what Real announce too for their deal.Sure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.
How do we know we get a % of shirt sales?
Aren't the paying us like £75m a year for the privalige of making our shirt? Why would they do that to not reap the vast majority of profit?
Di Marzio figures don't add up. The Barca figures wrong now were they? Oh please do provide me the source that shows its wrong?Let's see what they announce at their GM. Also lets see what Real announce too for their deal.
You actually remember what threads someone on a forum has started? That's special.
I could also probably go through your post history where you've been wrong more than enough times but that's got nothing do with the Pogba transfer now does it?
The Guardian article is written by Romano, who works for Di MarzioSure let's believe Guardian and Independent over Di Marzio who has been on the ball regarding this transfer from day one.
As far as misinformation goes, weren't you the one who started the Madrid and Barcelona sponsorship threads? Have you bothered to rectify it now that it had been found that both of them were wrong infos? Sod off now.