Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 42,405
If they wanted to play 3 at the back, I'm sure they would've kept Cuadrado
All these changes you're mentioning are just unrealistic in one summer.
What sign Luiz and put Morgan Rojo and Jones up for sale? Not sure we could not manage that the only one would be getting a buyer for Rojo at any price.
Better for him and the club if he wasn't going to start every match that he went. Not as good or consistent going forward as Willian and isn't nearly as good defending at as actual fullback.If they wanted to play 3 at the back, I'm sure they would've kept Cuadrado
And then put him on the bench? I'd play Smalling, Blind and Bailey ahead of Luiz. If we want to buy a CB we need to go for a top quality one.What sign Luiz and put Morgan Rojo and Jones up for sale? Not sure we could not manage that the only one would be getting a buyer for Rojo at any price.
Yes, that's just too much for a player like Luiz. If he were a truly elite player I'd understand.
And then put him on the bench? I'd play Smalling, Blind and Bailey ahead of Luiz. If we want to buy a CB we need to go for a top quality one.
I wasn't talking about the price but getting rid of 3 players for him. The money means nothing when you have jokes like N'Dong leaving for 20m euros£30m is not to much for a player of Luiz calibre in my opinion.
I dunno, Conte likes defence minded midfielders.Would be utterly pointless to buy Kante AND play 3 at the back THEN play Matic as well. It's got to be
------------------Courtois
----------Cahill----Luiz-----Terry
Alonso-----------------------------Azpilicueta
--------------Kante---Fabregas------
------Willian------Costa---Hazard--------
Maybe Oscar for Fabregas... but anything else is just far too negative.
Myth that Conte is a defense minded coach. He famously played all 3 of Pirlo, Vidal, and Pogba in midfield.I dunno, Conte likes defence minded midfielders.
I think he played Pirlo in behind Marchisio and Pogba with Vidal slightly ahead of those two. A midfield of Pirlo, Pogba, Marchisio and Vidal is fairly solid defensively. In fact that's four players protecting the back three. Fairly defensive.Myth that Conte is a defense minded coach. He famously played all 3 of Pirlo, Vidal, and Pogba in midfield.
Why does everyone seem to think they're going to play 3-5-2? Surely the logical step would be to play a back four of Azpilicueta, Luiz, Terry and Alonso.
Myth that Conte is a defense minded coach. He famously played all 3 of Pirlo, Vidal, and Pogba in midfield.
I dunno, Conte likes defence minded midfielders.
As a Chelsea fan, this is what I've been saying. Many people posting 3-5-2 lineups without Azpi but he probably our best overall defender. Can't see him being dropped. Also don't think Terry has the range and pace to get around.Why does everyone seem to think they're going to play 3-5-2? Surely the logical step would be to play a back four of Azpilicueta, Luiz, Terry and Alonso.
Exactly.Why does everyone seem to think they're going to play 3-5-2? Surely the logical step would be to play a back four of Azpilicueta, Luiz, Terry and Alonso.
A City and Chelsea hybrid, would win the CL let alone the prem. IMO of courseSo a City and Chelsea hybrid would win the league.
A City and Chelsea hybrid, would win the CL let alone the prem. IMO of course
They dont look like anything, no team looks like anything yet, Im a strong believer you can not make judgements on top 4/ title races until after December, Palace were top 4 this time last year and Leicester were somewhere like 10th.They look exactly like us. Not wholly formed and probable/possible top four at best.
Manchester City do look like something though. Spurs seem to have found their "philosophy"They dont look like anything, no team looks like anything yet, Im a strong believer you can not make judgements on top 4/ title races until after December, Palace were top 4 this time last year and Leicester were somewhere like 10th.
No team looks like anything? You mean Sunderland don't look like a crushed bag of Made in China plankton? I can either believe you or my own eyes. Liverpool, Spurs, City = obviously got their game together to a decent extent. (Maybe Arsenal, too.) Us and Chelsea = clearly could go either way.They dont look like anything, no team looks like anything yet, Im a strong believer you can not make judgements on top 4/ title races until after December, Palace were top 4 this time last year and Leicester were somewhere like 10th.
Manchester City do look like something though. Spurs seem to have found their "philosophy"
No team looks like anything? You mean Sunderland don't look like a crushed bag of Made in China plankton? I can either believe you or my own eyes. Liverpool, Spurs, City = obviously got their game together to a decent extent. (Maybe Arsenal, too.) Us and Chelsea = clearly could go either way.
They looked good against Leicester, but we also belted Leicester so I guess it isn't a huge indicator of how good they can be. Ideally I'd like to leave with all 3 points, but I'd take a draw at Stamford Bridge. Have a feeling Jose will want to prove a point though...