- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 38,565
- Supports
- Arsenal
Hopefully before City's game so we can finish the season well.His comments suggest he as decided to leave.
Hopefully before City's game so we can finish the season well.His comments suggest he as decided to leave.
wasnt steve bould supposed to sort this?Arsenal players doing the Ranieri defense. Nevermind the players looking at the ball, wth is Bellerin doing? Top defensive organization
![]()
Various Arsenal forums, Robbie from AFTV and John Cross.Where?
I reckon he'll go. I just can't imagine him staying after all this unrest unless, unbeknownst to all, he's already signed his contract.
A word also on the players. I know the manager is ultimately responsible etc etc, but I'm irritated at how powerful players are nowadays. Regardless of what's going on with the manager, why can't they do their jobs?! They only need to put in sub-par performances, the board then sacks the manager, and on they go.
He did spend £90m last summer and has a huge wage bill. Xhaka and Mustafi don't seem that good though and Perez doesn't get many chancesI think Wenger needs to go. Not because of the fans (it's idiotic to base any substantial decision on the emotions of fickle fans), but I think it'll highlight the real problem here, which is the board's lack of investment.
Old school managers do it like old school, because he will think he might loose control until the end of the season because they are still I. The cup and top 4 race.It would be even more selfishness by him to wait till the end of the season to announce he's leaving. Do it Monday morning would be the most logical choice.
Hope he stays personally, but finding it harder and harder to see that happening sadly.
Various Arsenal forums, Robbie from AFTV and John Cross.
Too much smoke to be no fire, Wenger is staying![]()
I don't know what to believeHe's a gooner
Nailed on for Barca I reckon.
He did spend £90m last summer and has a huge wage bill. Xhaka and Mustafi don't seem that good though and Perez doesn't get many chances
As Lord Cruijff used to say, you have to look at the profile of tthe manager, the objectives of the club which comes from above and whether the results are being achieved. The board want stability, don't want to overspend and want to achieve top 4/European Football which Arsene has done every single year. He is the perfect accounts manager.
For the fans, it is a different story. To win you need a talent advantage or a tactical advantage, preferrably both. The talent gap between the teams in the top 4 within the premiership is not very large so the major problem for them is the tactical edge. Arsene Wenger even after all this time, does not have an attacking or defensive structure. The players have a very loose structure and seem to have free roles and that is why their football can look very organic and pleasing on the eye, but it means that they are very disorganised when they lose the ball and are very easy to counter attack. The very top coaches like Conte and Pep have very clear ideas. Also their continued weakness in set pieces has still not been addressed, which shines more light towards the way of one Arsene Wenger.
Now if you sack Arsene Wenger, as a growing number of fans want, you bring in another manager, the club is from top to bottom set up around Arsene Wengers modus operandi, which is a big problem as we saw what happened when Sir Alex Ferguson retired. There is no director of football to discuss transfers, there is noone to counter balance to him which is very important. Chelsea have fired several managers but have at their core remained successful because they have that seperation, Manchester City has this to some extent. This will have to be fixed going forward which means the club could go through a darker transition period that could be harsher than Manchester Uniteds. I think ultimately, the power and control that the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson had on Manchester United contributed to the difficult transition period as in his last few years, he signed short term targets rather than looking out for the long term interest for the club.
Another thing is Arsenal itself. If they get a new manager, will the players there be able to adapt to him? Will he be able to adapt to the existing players? Will he be able to identify the correct targets and then acquire them? The Premier League has so much money and it brazenly taunts the footballing world. Their new TV deal had continental sporting directors' mouths watering. Sporting directors from several countries have said they double the price or sometimes triple the price of a player when a premier league team is involved because they know they can get away with it. This means that getting the right targets will be difficult just from the price alone and then you have the fact that Chelsea, Manchester CIty and Manchester United can outspend Arsenal and hare more favourable destinations than Arsenal so they might not even be able to acquire the right players even if they are identified. People think to linearly of football management.
I think the situation is far more complicated than people want to admit, Chelsea and City are the only teams that currenlty have the structure that is akin to the continental super clubs such as Bayern Munchen, FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, which the top EPL clubs want to compete with. Manchester United are going through that transition period but have the finances to cover for it. Arsenal as a footballing instituton has a lot to ponder over the next coming years.
They had fabregas van persie nasri sagna one point of time.He did spend £90m last summer and has a huge wage bill. Xhaka and Mustafi don't seem that good though and Perez doesn't get many chances
That comment was tongue in cheek too.
No offense intended.
We are far richer than Arsenal though, you can't expect Arsenals board to match United's spending last summerIn comparison we spent how much on Pogba, Henrick, Zlatan... And fans still think we need more investment.
He could spend better, but every manager can. I maintain that for the money they spend, their position sounds about right. The problem isnt their position, it's the stagnation, according to the fans.
I think us fans are partly responsible. Whenever there's a problem the manager must go - that's correct in some situations - but it unfortunately gives the players too much power, who feel they can do as they please as the manager will always pay the ultimate price - not them. Maybe the players need to have the fans give them a hard time.Aye. Bending to player power sets a trend. Even at Ferguson's lowest points at United, it was clear that players who crossed his path would be sent packing. More of that would be refreshing.
As Lord Cruijff used to say, you have to look at the profile of tthe manager, the objectives of the club which comes from above and whether the results are being achieved. The board want stability, don't want to overspend and want to achieve top 4/European Football which Arsene has done every single year. He is the perfect accounts manager.
For the fans, it is a different story. To win you need a talent advantage or a tactical advantage, preferrably both. The talent gap between the teams in the top 4 within the premiership is not very large so the major problem for them is the tactical edge. Arsene Wenger even after all this time, does not have an attacking or defensive structure. The players have a very loose structure and seem to have free roles and that is why their football can look very organic and pleasing on the eye, but it means that they are very disorganised when they lose the ball and are very easy to counter attack. The very top coaches like Conte and Pep have very clear ideas. Also their continued weakness in set pieces has still not been addressed, which shines more light towards the way of one Arsene Wenger.
Now if you sack Arsene Wenger, as a growing number of fans want, you bring in another manager, the club is from top to bottom set up around Arsene Wengers modus operandi, which is a big problem as we saw what happened when Sir Alex Ferguson retired. There is no director of football to discuss transfers, there is noone to counter balance to him which is very important. Chelsea have fired several managers but have at their core remained successful because they have that seperation, Manchester City has this to some extent. This will have to be fixed going forward which means the club could go through a darker transition period that could be harsher than Manchester Uniteds. I think ultimately, the power and control that the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson had on Manchester United contributed to the difficult transition period as in his last few years, he signed short term targets rather than looking out for the long term interest for the club.
Another thing is Arsenal itself. If they get a new manager, will the players there be able to adapt to him? Will he be able to adapt to the existing players? Will he be able to identify the correct targets and then acquire them? The Premier League has so much money and it brazenly taunts the footballing world. Their new TV deal had continental sporting directors' mouths watering. Sporting directors from several countries have said they double the price or sometimes triple the price of a player when a premier league team is involved because they know they can get away with it. This means that getting the right targets will be difficult just from the price alone and then you have the fact that Chelsea, Manchester CIty and Manchester United can outspend Arsenal and hare more favourable destinations than Arsenal so they might not even be able to acquire the right players even if they are identified. People think to linearly of football management.
I think the situation is far more complicated than people want to admit, Chelsea and City are the only teams that currenlty have the structure that is akin to the continental super clubs such as Bayern Munchen, FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, which the top EPL clubs want to compete with. Manchester United are going through that transition period but have the finances to cover for it. Arsenal as a footballing instituton has a lot to ponder over the next coming years.
Image him winning the treble, lol!Wenger favourite for next Barca manager?!![]()
![]()
Last post for the day as I'm a newbie. I wanted to say if I knew how to like/could like then I'd give u one. Excellent post and I agree with whats been said. I think however that most Arsenal fans accept that it'll be unpredictable when Wenger leaves and we may see some bad times before things get better. Great post though nonetheless.As Lord Cruijff used to say, you have to look at the profile of tthe manager, the objectives of the club which comes from above and whether the results are being achieved. The board want stability, don't want to overspend and want to achieve top 4/European Football which Arsene has done every single year. He is the perfect accounts manager.
For the fans, it is a different story. To win you need a talent advantage or a tactical advantage, preferrably both. The talent gap between the teams in the top 4 within the premiership is not very large so the major problem for them is the tactical edge. Arsene Wenger even after all this time, does not have an attacking or defensive structure. The players have a very loose structure and seem to have free roles and that is why their football can look very organic and pleasing on the eye, but it means that they are very disorganised when they lose the ball and are very easy to counter attack. The very top coaches like Conte and Pep have very clear ideas. Also their continued weakness in set pieces has still not been addressed, which shines more light towards the way of one Arsene Wenger.
Now if you sack Arsene Wenger, as a growing number of fans want, you bring in another manager, the club is from top to bottom set up around Arsene Wengers modus operandi, which is a big problem as we saw what happened when Sir Alex Ferguson retired. There is no director of football to discuss transfers, there is noone to counter balance to him which is very important. Chelsea have fired several managers but have at their core remained successful because they have that seperation, Manchester City has this to some extent. This will have to be fixed going forward which means the club could go through a darker transition period that could be harsher than Manchester Uniteds. I think ultimately, the power and control that the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson had on Manchester United contributed to the difficult transition period as in his last few years, he signed short term targets rather than looking out for the long term interest for the club.
Another thing is Arsenal itself. If they get a new manager, will the players there be able to adapt to him? Will he be able to adapt to the existing players? Will he be able to identify the correct targets and then acquire them? The Premier League has so much money and it brazenly taunts the footballing world. Their new TV deal had continental sporting directors' mouths watering. Sporting directors from several countries have said they double the price or sometimes triple the price of a player when a premier league team is involved because they know they can get away with it. This means that getting the right targets will be difficult just from the price alone and then you have the fact that Chelsea, Manchester CIty and Manchester United can outspend Arsenal and hare more favourable destinations than Arsenal so they might not even be able to acquire the right players even if they are identified. People think to linearly of football management.
I think the situation is far more complicated than people want to admit, Chelsea and City are the only teams that currenlty have the structure that is akin to the continental super clubs such as Bayern Munchen, FC Barcelona and Real Madrid, which the top EPL clubs want to compete with. Manchester United are going through that transition period but have the finances to cover for it. Arsenal as a footballing instituton has a lot to ponder over the next coming years.
He would do well there...Wenger favourite for next Barca manager?!![]()
![]()
Now if you sack Arsene Wenger, as a growing number of fans want, you bring in another manager, the club is from top to bottom set up around Arsene Wengers modus operandi, which is a big problem as we saw what happened when Sir Alex Ferguson retired. There is no director of football to discuss transfers, there is noone to counter balance to him which is very important. Chelsea have fired several managers but have at their core remained successful because they have that seperation, Manchester City has this to some extent. This will have to be fixed going forward which means the club could go through a darker transition period that could be harsher than Manchester Uniteds. I think ultimately, the power and control that the legendary Sir Alex Ferguson had on Manchester United contributed to the difficult transition period as in his last few years, he signed short term targets rather than looking out for the long term interest for the club.
I missed most of the match; why are people saying that Arsene has lost the players? Just because of a poor performance or did something else occur?
No chance. He is a tactical dinosaur.He would do well there...
His time is just up at Arsenal.
I agreeI'm no Wenger apologist but watching the likes of Soccer Saturday and MOTD, you'd think Arsenal were fighting relegation - words thrown around like "disgrace" and "shambolic". Even if you take away Wenger's historic achievements, they continually finish in the top 4, make the CL knockout stages every year and have recently won the FA Cup twice, all of this whilst spending far less than the likes of Chelsea, City and us.
As for the 'misery' of being an Arsenal fan, they are potentially 2 points from 4th, ahead of us and only 2 wins away from second place - they've played entertaining football over the years and fans are generally able to see some world class players on a weekly basis, albeit at high cost. I get that fans want to win the league every year and in honesty, Arsenal haven't really gone gone close in recent years but only 6 teams have ever won the PL in 25 years (and football didn't exist before then) - if you discount the Leicester anomaly then the top teams across Europe spend huge sums of money - it's not very romantic and a sad indication of modern coproerate football but Wenger is a board's dream - somebody who generates big revenue whilst spending less than the competition.
Ultimately I think Arsenal fans have had it pretty fecking good under Wenger. If the board are willing to give a new manager £150m a season for the next 3 years, then fair enough, maybe a fresh approach could be good and Wenger should probably step down but if not, it's a huge risk, which could backfire massively.
His comments suggest he as decided to leave.
Amy Lawrence who's quite close to Wenger think he will stay. The rumour doing the rounds is that it will be announced after the season and the delay is due to season tickets renewals. Sounds far fetched but I wouldn't put it past that money obsessed club.
I'm no Wenger apologist but watching the likes of Soccer Saturday and MOTD, you'd think Arsenal were fighting relegation - words thrown around like "disgrace" and "shambolic". Even if you take away Wenger's historic achievements, they continually finish in the top 4, make the CL knockout stages every year and have recently won the FA Cup twice, all of this whilst spending far less than the likes of Chelsea, City and us.
As for the 'misery' of being an Arsenal fan, they are potentially 2 points from 4th, ahead of us and only 2 wins away from second place - they've played entertaining football over the years and fans are generally able to see some world class players on a weekly basis, albeit at high cost. I get that fans want to win the league every year and in honesty, Arsenal haven't really gone gone close in recent years but only 6 teams have ever won the PL in 25 years (and football didn't exist before then) - if you discount the Leicester anomaly then the top teams across Europe spend huge sums of money - it's not very romantic and a sad indication of modern corporate football but Wenger is a board's dream - somebody who generates big revenue whilst spending less than the competition.
Ultimately I think Arsenal fans have had it pretty fecking good under Wenger. If the board are willing to give a new manager £150m a season for the next 3 years, then fair enough, maybe a fresh approach could be good and Wenger should probably step down but if not, it's a huge risk, which could backfire massively.
He's spent 20 years being the boss at arsenal. You think he'd accept going to a place where he has to work under a GM, DOF and President who are very much involved in running the first team? You think he'd go to a club where if he has a problem with a star player(say, verratti) he'd be told by his bosses to make sure he keeps the player happy?No chance. PSG is the biggest job he could get.