The guy has won 3 trophies in last 4 years- same as Chelsea, us and City, despite having spent way less than the 3 clubs. He's finished above us in all of the last 4 seasons as well. To say that Wenger is finished and him staying is a blessing is us hugely underestimating his ability as a manager
Nah, he hasn't won the PL or even challenged properly in donkey years. He can win the FA cup all he likes, I couldn't care less.The guy has won 3 trophies in last 4 years- same as Chelsea, us and City, despite having spent way less than the 3 clubs. He's finished above us in all of the last 4 seasons as well. To say that Wenger is finished and him staying is a blessing is us hugely underestimating his ability as a manager
Really? So it's clear Tuchel might replace Wenger.Guess that depends on, when Tuchel gets fired by Dortmund. That´s also scheduled for mid-week.![]()
Really? So it's clear Tuchel might replace Wenger.
The guy has won 3 trophies in last 4 years- same as Chelsea, us and City, despite having spent way less than the 3 clubs. He's finished above us in all of the last 4 seasons as well. To say that Wenger is finished and him staying is a blessing is us hugely underestimating his ability as a manager
Nah, he hasn't won the PL or even challenged properly in donkey years. He can win the FA cup all he likes, I couldn't care less.
Van Gaal was sacked because of the how god awful our play had become. If he had got us playing well, the FA cup might have saved him. With Wenger, for all his fourth place finishes, he at least has them playing well. I'm not we are underestimating his talent, just pointing out that the situation with LvG was different.It really isn't. If winning the FA Cup was a true measure of managerial talent we'd have Van Gaal still in charge.
Is it that surprising or weird that he hasn't though?
At least 2 of us, City and Chelsea have had a better team than them for most of that time.
Probably one of his better teams in a long time and they're still not great in 3/4 positions and dont have particularly good cover for injuries
He could have been more pragmatic and ground out more results and sneak a league win if they were lucky in that time but playing good football isn't the worst trade off in the world
Why should that be a trade off? Every league winner I can remember has always played good football. Good football is the key to winning lots of football matches. If anything, a cup competition like the FA Cup is a better option if a manager wants to try and win trophies by grinding out results without playing good football.
I believe he's had the resources to at least challenge in the last decade. Liverpool have gotten closer without having regular CL football, and so have Spurs for that matter. Under him the expectations have continuously been revised downwards, from winning titles, to challenging until March, to squeezing in the top four, and now not even doing that.Is it that surprising or weird that he hasn't though?
At least 2 of us, City and Chelsea have had a better team than them for most of that time.
Probably one of his better teams in a long time and they're still not great in 3/4 positions and dont have particularly good cover for injuries
He could have been more pragmatic and ground out more results and sneak a league win if they were lucky in that time but playing good football isn't the worst trade off in the world
I believe he's had the resources to at least challenge in the last decade. Liverpool have gotten closer without having regular CL football, and so have Spurs for that matter. Under him the expectations have continuously been revised downwards, from winning titles, to challenging until March, to squeezing in the top four, and now not even doing that.
I believe he's had the resources to at least challenge in the last decade. Liverpool have gotten closer without having regular CL football, and so have Spurs for that matter. Under him the expectations have continuously been revised downwards, from winning titles, to challenging until March, to squeezing in the top four, and now not even doing that.
This is the first season in ages that tottenham have finished ahead of him and they were still miles off the top.
Liverpool finished this season one point ahead of him with no european football and dropping out of domestic cups first chance they got.
And both have pretty good managers in their own right (who'll struggle to win the league too).
I think they do about as well as you'd expect every season. You could criticise him for not overachieving at least once in that time but he hasn't really underachieved either.
As i said I get whey the supporters want a change, the whole groundhog day nature of their season would probably drive me mental
But i dont think anyone else is going to manage better.
Maybe Simeone could but that isn't going to be a very smooth transition
They may have pipped Spurs to second last season but Spurs were in the title hunt for most of the season and Arsenal were never in the picture. They only sneaked in after the title destination was long decided. For banter purposes the gooners have full right to mock Spurs for it, but I don't think any of them honestly could say they were closer to the title than Spurs. The disparity is even more stark this year.This is the first season in ages that tottenham have finished ahead of him and they were still miles off the top.
Liverpool finished this season one point ahead of him with no european football and dropping out of domestic cups first chance they got.
And both have pretty good managers in their own right (who'll struggle to win the league too).
I think they do about as well as you'd expect every season. You could criticise him for not overachieving at least once in that time but he hasn't really underachieved either.
As i said I get whey the supporters want a change, the whole groundhog day nature of their season would probably drive me mental
But i dont think anyone else is going to manage better.
Maybe Simeone could but that isn't going to be a very smooth transition
They may have pipped Spurs to second last season but Spurs were in the title hunt for most of the season and Arsenal were never in the picture. They only sneaked in after the title destination was long decided. For banter purposes the gooners have full right to mock Spurs for it, but I don't think any of them honestly could say they were closer to the title than Spurs. The disparity is even more stark this year.
I think in light of that, and our own collapse as @Pogue Mahone pointed out, you would expect Arsenal to have done better these last two seasons. Last year 3 of the 'big 6' managers were sacked. Poch had way less resources than Wenger while Klopp was in his first season and was 45 minutes away from winning Liverpool a European trophy. For Arsenal to go nowhere in Europe and still not be in the title frame was poor. This season they've lost out on the only thing Wenger's been delivering for Arsenal - CL qualification. He deserves the sack, imo.
I agree with you that I don't think a new manager comes in and it gets better all of a sudden, but the trend now (and for some time) has been downwards and they'd hope someone can come in and at least start building the club back to a place where it competes for the biggest trophies. They ought to at least try.
I guess I'd rather my team tried to chase down the frontrunners and then collapse due to demoralization after it became impossible than never having been in the hunt at all. Arsenal basically won the games at the end of the season when it no longer mattered, a bit like their run right at the death this year which ended up being too little too late as well. Can see both sides of it, for those who would argue Spurs showed weak mentality in their collapse.Yeah hes underachieved last 2 years, hard to argue with that
Not by a drastic amount though
Tottenham were never close to the title last year so it seems kind of irrelevant tbh.
Them getting back into the race was always reliant on Leicester fecking up and collapsing.
The fact that Tottenham did instead should surely be a black mark against them relative to arsenal rather than an argument in their favour.
I get why the fans want a change and I get why the board isn't enthusiastic about giving them a change.
I dont think firing him is the blindingly, obvious best option that some suggest basically.
New contract following fa cup final result? Yes please! I guess every cloud does a silver lining.
Well that would be quite responsible of you as you'd only be able to survive for 100 days...he clearly has the money to spend for players. So I dont get the logic of "not having resources".
Its like me living in NY with $1000 in the bank but spending only $10 per day and then complaining I have to live on limited resources
Well that would be quite responsible of you as you'd only be able to survive for 100 days...
Wenger doesn't get the idea of inflation. He complains every year about how prices of top talent has gone up and is ridiculous and then proceeds to buy mid quality talent. However due to prices inflating at 15 to 20% annually, price of mid quality talent today is approximately equal to the price of top talent 2 years prior.
Given arsenals cost of debt is less than 6%, assuming inflation persists (which is very reasonable given player prices have been rising at double digit percentages annually for more than 2 decades) economics dictate one should just borrow and buy as many players as quickly as possible because in a year or 2 they'll be much more expensive and the cost to finance is much lower than inflation.
Pundits in being fickle shocker. I agree it's bizarre, but the English fans/press love to change the narrative as often as possible.Anyone else finding it bizarre how that FA Cup win has changed the minds of so many fans/pundits who were previously absolutely convinced that Wenger needed to leave for the good of Arsenal?
The financial constraints argument is valid for the period of the transition. Fact is; he has had no financial constraints for the last couple seasons. Signing Ozil and Sanchez are two examples of Arsenal getting back on board with spending power.Can we have a poll on how many blame the Arsenal board as opposed to the manager? I'd say with the budget he has been provided over the past years and the Emirates project - Wenger hasn't been that underwhelming; . After Wenger lost his "Invincible's", he either did not adequately replace them or was not able to (because of financial constraints) and therein lies his eventual downfall.
If his replacement is Tuchel no thanks.for business reasons, which football sadly is about these days, Wenger is a very good asset and he should stay. They can see what happened to us when we lost SAF:
1)we have gone through 3 managers (not much stability) in a short time. Also there arent that many top managers out there. huge gamble
2) we have not qualified for Champions leagues most years...
3) we have spent a huge amount of money on players (for various reasons, ie coaches needs and systems, incompetent of Ed in his first years, players not performing etc..).
Wenger has plodded on being in the money and only this year has not qualified for the Champions League... Also he spends relatively little
bottom line: I would keep him if I were Arsenal, change does not guaranty success