padr81
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 12,217
- Supports
- Man City
Danilo will play in 3 positions depending I think. RB, LB and DMC depending on where he's required.
Nope. Danilo will provide cover at left back too and can play central mid if needs be as well.Are thy really spunking £80 million on two right backs?
Good call. Didn't think about it.I was wondering about this exact thing as well. It makes even less sense from the perspective of Danilo - unless City have doubled his wages, which I doubt but don't know. I could see him playing as RCB in a three-at-the-back set up also though.
Their main creator will be De Bruyne, and main goalscorer will be Aguero.![]()
Aguero doesn't seem to be on the outs with Guardiola any more, and he's one of the few certainties in the EPL. He'll get minutes as a starter, and minutes for Aguero means goals.Gabriel Jesus says whhhurrrttt?
How much are the new buys on?Kolarov to Roma confirmed for almost £6m. Surprised we got that fee for him in truth given his age. Hard to see fans of Roma or Lazio being cool with this.
Despite his flaws I always like him. Another of our best ever team shipped out, even though its the right call, sad to see him go. He's played a part in every trophy we've won in my lifetime (apart from a first division in 2002).
We've now taken in £41m in incoming this summer from
Kola - £5.8m
Unal - £11.9m
Nolito - £7.65m
Hart - £2m (loan fee)
Sobrino - £1.7m
Mooy - £7.75m
Ntcham - £4.5m
If we can offload Mangala (rumored £15m), Nasri (£5m approx), Bony (£10m), Fernando, Brattan, Denayer and maybe Delph we should get close to covering the cost of 2 of the fullbacks and cut wages by a fair amount for FFP.
Add in Iheanacho (£25m) and we should be taking in well over £100m for the summer.
How much are the new buys on?
City are giving Hart a couple of a million (out of the loan fee)? Presumably to help with the FFP?
He's not going to start over Walker or Mendy. Not going to be first choice at DM either so he's just swapped one bench for another.Danilo will be a very good WB imo, should definitely look better than he showed at Madrid.
They'll be on less than Nasri for certain. Plus there is only 5 coming in and about 15 leaving.
In wages we've had
Kolarov - 85k
Clichy - 90k
Zabeleta - 90k
Sagna - 80k
Nolito - 100k
Navas - 90k
Caballero - 25k
Unal - 10k
The above are already gone with the following wages leaving
Nasri - 120k
Bony - 100k
Delph - 90k
Fernando - 75k
Mangala - 100k
Iheanacho - 10k (can't remember if he signed a new deal)
Hart - 110k (not sure how much of his wages we're paying so I'll leave him out of my maths. edit: Appearantly we're paying 55k of his 120k wages.)
Thats 55,380,000 in wages off the books.
Yaya also singed a new deal at 1/2 his former wages.
Thats another £6m off the books (so essentially Yaya's wage cut will fund the wages for one of the new signings.)
In total that will be £61m in wages gone if all leave.
If Ederson, Walker, Mendy, Silva and Danilo are on even £100k per week thats a maximum of £26m so a saving on wages of £35 providing we get all the above off the books.
Taking wages and transfers into account.
We'll be plus £35m on wages.
Outgoing will be around £100m (providing the Iheanacho deal goes ahead) and transfer spending (using transfer markt as a guide) will be at
Walker - 45 (rising to 54, I believe)
Silva - 43
Ederson - 34
Luiz - 10
Mendy - 52
Danilo - 30 (fee is believed between 30 and 35m Euro, so I put in £30m).
Thats £223m out (providing we eventually pay the £54m for Walker)
If we hit transfer income of £100m (all hinging on Kelechi)
And we save £30m on wages from the free transfers/players out.
We're looking at being around £93m in the hole for the summer.
Things will look even better if Denayer moves on, although I believe his wage at City is only around £1.25m a year.
They'll be on less than Nasri for certain. Plus there is only 5 coming in and about 15 leaving.
In wages we've had
Kolarov - 85k
Clichy - 90k
Zabeleta - 90k
Sagna - 80k
Nolito - 100k
Navas - 90k
Caballero - 25k
Unal - 10k
The above are already gone with the following wages leaving
Nasri - 120k
Bony - 100k
Delph - 90k
Fernando - 75k
Mangala - 100k
Iheanacho - 10k (can't remember if he signed a new deal)
Hart - 110k (not sure how much of his wages we're paying so I'll leave him out of my maths. edit: Appearantly we're paying 55k of his 120k wages.)
Thats 55,380,000 in wages off the books.
Yaya also singed a new deal at 1/2 his former wages.
Thats another £6m off the books (so essentially Yaya's wage cut will fund the wages for one of the new signings.)
You won't get rid of all of them(bolded ones) at full wages. Plus Walker, Mendy, Silva will be all at more than 100k.
Kolarov to Roma confirmed for almost £6m. Surprised we got that fee for him in truth given his age. Hard to see fans of Roma or Lazio being cool with this.
Despite his flaws I always like him. Another of our best ever team shipped out, even though its the right call, sad to see him go. He's played a part in every trophy we've won in my lifetime (apart from a first division in 2002).
We've now taken in £41m in incoming this summer from
Kola - £5.8m
Unal - £11.9m
Nolito - £7.65m
Hart - £2m (loan fee)
Sobrino - £1.7m
Mooy - £7.75m
Ntcham - £4.5m
If we can offload Mangala (rumored £15m), Nasri (£5m approx), Bony (£10m), Fernando, Brattan, Denayer and maybe Delph we should get close to covering the cost of 2 of the fullbacks and cut wages by a fair amount for FFP.
Add in Iheanacho (£25m) and we should be taking in well over £100m for the summer.
They'll be on less than Nasri for certain. Plus there is only 5 coming in and about 15 leaving.
In wages we've had
Kolarov - 85k
Clichy - 90k
Zabeleta - 90k
Sagna - 80k
Nolito - 100k
Navas - 90k
Caballero - 25k
Unal - 10k
The above are already gone with the following wages leaving
Nasri - 120k
Bony - 100k
Delph - 90k
Fernando - 75k
Mangala - 100k
Iheanacho - 10k (can't remember if he signed a new deal)
Hart - 110k (not sure how much of his wages we're paying so I'll leave him out of my maths. edit: Appearantly we're paying 55k of his 120k wages.)
Thats 55,380,000 in wages off the books.
Yaya also singed a new deal at 1/2 his former wages.
Thats another £6m off the books (so essentially Yaya's wage cut will fund the wages for one of the new signings.)
In total that will be £61m in wages gone if all leave.
If Ederson, Walker, Mendy, Silva and Danilo are on even £100k per week thats a maximum of £26m so a saving on wages of £35 providing we get all the above off the books.
Taking wages and transfers into account.
We'll be plus £35m on wages.
Outgoing will be around £100m (providing the Iheanacho deal goes ahead) and transfer spending (using transfer markt as a guide) will be at
Walker - 45 (rising to 54, I believe)
Silva - 43
Ederson - 34
Luiz - 10
Mendy - 52
Danilo - 30 (fee is believed between 30 and 35m Euro, so I put in £30m).
Thats £223m out (providing we eventually pay the £54m for Walker)
If we hit transfer income of £100m (all hinging on Kelechi)
And we save £30m on wages from the free transfers/players out.
We're looking at being around £93m in the hole for the summer.
Things will look even better if Denayer moves on, although I believe his wage at City is only around £1.25m a year.
feck off. Still be a little short ! Hahaha !Fee finally agreed for Mendy according to L'Equipe. £50m.
If we manage to acquire the bracketed targets we'll still be a little short. A cheaper winger might be in order if Sanchez does indeed go to PSG.
Ridiculous assertion. Name me ONE CB anywhere in the world who doesn't have a brainfart now and again. They are human beings not robots.You mean best defender at City surely. There are quite a few full backs i'd play as CB's over him, let alone natural CB's. He's prone to major brain farts along with Stones & Otamendi. He just doesn't get called out on them as much.
Yep, his crosses are pure magic.For me Mendy is their best signing. He's excellent and City's LB has been crap for years. No decent team should have Kolarov and Clichy competing at LB.
I could see him being first choice right back after a few weeks as he is certainly a better passer and better technically than walkerDanilo will play in 3 positions depending I think. RB, LB and DMC depending on where he's required.
Because better players guarantee success?! And other clubs spend money too, you know. City will play fantastic attacking football, most neutrals will love them, but the likes of United and Chelsea with their counter attacking approach might the ones, who're laughing at the end of the day.City-arab-oil-money to play like this?
Ederson
Danilo Kompany Stones
Walker Silva Fernandinho Mendy
Bernardo Silva de Bruyne
Gabriel Jesus
Sterling, Sanè and Aguero on the bench. If they didn't win the league Guardiola should just retire.
If kompany can't stay fit (and he has not managed over 30 league games in a season since 2011-2012 I still they look a little underwhelming with centre backs.. . Especially with a keeper new to the pl behind them... hopefully they don't go and jiz a sackfull of oil money on a decent defender and that can be their undoingNo doubt they have a strong squad next year, they're gonna take some beating.
Hopefully. Liked him at Barca, but i just can't stand him now.Because better players guarantee success?! And other clubs spend money too, you know. City will play fantastic attacking football, most neutrals will love them, but the likes of United and Chelsea with their counter attacking approach might the ones, who're laughing at the end of the day.
Haha, just knew it.Hopefully. Liked him at Barca, but i just can't stand him now.
The issue is the players in question. I would hope we conclude our deals by end of this month.City are raising an interesting questiin, for me.
We've clearly got the same spending power that City have. However City seem to pay whatever it takes, while we're sticking to some sort of financial morals, for lack of a better phrase. We seem keen to do it on our terms while City are just meeting selling clubs valuations.
With City you get the feeling if they wanted Perisic, they would've paid the €50m or whatever Inter wanted.
Which do you prefer? Pay whatever it takes or have your own valuation and pretty much stick to that?
City are raising an interesting questiin, for me.
We've clearly got the same spending power that City have. However City seem to pay whatever it takes, while we're sticking to some sort of financial morals, for lack of a better phrase. We seem keen to do it on our terms while City are just meeting selling clubs valuations.
With City you get the feeling if they wanted Perisic, they would've paid the €50m or whatever Inter wanted.
Which do you prefer? Pay whatever it takes or have your own valuation and pretty much stick to that?
Neither extreme is viable long term but you can understand the suits being more willing to spend over the top when the player in question is in his early 20s or even approaching 25 than when the player is in his late 20s already. There's also the financial side to it, I don't know much about it but I'd be interested to know if we could afford the spending City do every season. Not talking about a season or 2 here but doing it over and over every summer like they've been doing for a while now.City are raising an interesting questiin, for me.
We've clearly got the same spending power that City have. However City seem to pay whatever it takes, while we're sticking to some sort of financial morals, for lack of a better phrase. We seem keen to do it on our terms while City are just meeting selling clubs valuations.
With City you get the feeling if they wanted Perisic, they would've paid the €50m or whatever Inter wanted.
Which do you prefer? Pay whatever it takes or have your own valuation and pretty much stick to that?
City are raising an interesting questiin, for me.
We've clearly got the same spending power that City have. However City seem to pay whatever it takes, while we're sticking to some sort of financial morals, for lack of a better phrase. We seem keen to do it on our terms while City are just meeting selling clubs valuations.
With City you get the feeling if they wanted Perisic, they would've paid the €50m or whatever Inter wanted.
Which do you prefer? Pay whatever it takes or have your own valuation and pretty much stick to that?
Exactly, pretty much all of City's purchases should guarantee an average of 7-8 years of football. I don't see them doing this every summer, so they are probably just biting the bullet and going gung ho this summer rather than waiting summer after summer. When you consider how much personnel that they've let go off in one window, their makes sense, albeit expensive.Neither extreme is viable long term but you can understand the suits being more willing to spend over the top when the player in question is in his early 20s or even approaching 25 than when the player is in his late 20s already. There's also the financial side to it, I don't know much about it but I'd be interested to know if we could afford the spending City do every season. Not talking about a season or 2 here but doing it over and over every summer like they've been doing for a while now.
Exactly, pretty much all of City's purchases should guarantee an average of 7-8 years of football. I don't see them doing this every summer, so they are probably just biting the bullet and going gung ho this summer rather than waiting summer after summer. When you consider how much personnel that they've let go off in one window, their makes sense, albeit expensive.
If you can identify all the targets you need in one summer and can afford it, I see no problems there.
Guardiola has spent 370 million since joining City!![]()
You've paid £89m for Pogba and £75m for Lukaku in the last 12 months. Have a word.We seem keen to do it on our terms while City are just meeting selling clubs valuations.
How much has Mourinho spent?
Yeah. Can you see a difference between our approach and yours this summer? I haven't even said withers right or wrong, but imo there's a clear difference between the 2 approaches this summer.You've paid £89m for Pogba and £75m for Lukaku in the last 12 months. Have a word.