BusbyMalone
First Man Falling
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 10,362
Christ, i hope our game is a little less frantic!
Watford were the better team overallHave to put this one on Klopp. Poor organisation at the back as usual and we threw the game away with our subs. Each sub made us a little worse.
Chest beat that you gurning prick.
Because a backpass is played by the defending team.What is the rule then? And how come a player can't be offised during a back-pass?
That it will he has been instrumental in keeping them in the league over the past few years. That's why he is worth more to them than the £40m offered by Everton.Losing him would be a huge blow for Swansea.
So a ball that is played backwards, and then knocked forward by the keeper makes a player offside?Because a backpass is played by the defending team.
Because that's not a rule. The direction of the ball doesn't matter.
Because that's not a rule. The direction of the ball doesn't matter.
Can't be offside from a ball deliberately played by the defending team. The rule is, a player has to have two players between him and the goal line when a ball is played to be onside. Of the player is behind the ball when it is player they're also onside. Direction of the pass doesn't matter.What is the rule then? And how come a player can't be offised during a back-pass?
No I'm not because I know the rules. If Player X is ahead of all defenders and the ball and player Y passes the ball backwards so Player X runs back to get it he's still offside because he was ahead of the ball when it was played. Direction of the pass does not matter. It is not a rule, it's not in the rules. Just the position of the players relative to the ball.Unless the rule has changed, passing the ball backwards cannot be offside from what I understood
Its great to watch, but the standard of the top teams in the league is terrible. Ill be shocked if any of our sides get past the 1/4 finals in the champions league.
So a ball that is played backwards, and then knocked forward by the keeper makes a player offside?
The ball was played backwards by the attacking team though, so I say it does matterCan't be offside from a ball deliberately played by the defending team. The rule is, a player has to have two players between him and the goal line when a ball is played to be onside. Of the player is behind the ball when it is player they're also onside. Direction of the pass doesn't matter.
Because that's not a rule. The direction of the ball doesn't matter.
It should just be if anyone is ahead of the defence when the ball is put in they are offside. Make it basic. No interfering with play. It is too open to interpretation.Women used to be mocked for not understanding the offside rule. I now know how they felt. As do a fair few officials. How did it turn into such a mess?
It wasn't a shot though. It was going away from the goal, but Mignolet decided in his own little world to put a hand out and hit it towards his goal. No way it was offside imoI have no idea what you're trying to describe. But if you're referring to the last goal, I thought it was offside due to the shot that the watford player took that made Mignolet flap at it. At the point the shot was taken, Britos was offside, so when it rebounded of Mignolet and landed at Britos, it should have been offside. It was minimal and very quick so not surprised the linesman missed it tbh
Because that's not a rule. The direction of the ball doesn't matter.
Correct.The ball was hit backward, hit a liverpool player which took it in the direction of the keeper, who then managed to hit the ball onto his own crossbar.
The rules do not.The ball was played backwards by the attacking team though, so I say it does matter
Go on then, show me the rule that says direction of a pass matters? It doesn't. Position of the ball relative to a players position matters. A ball can be played backwards and a player can be offside.Suggest you check the rules again then. You cannot be offside of the ball doesn't travel forward. So a perfectly square pass to a man who is in front of the ball would still not be offside.
I thought it was toward goal. Oh well, in that case, god knows. The main thing is Watford got their goal, Klopp will be mad and RAWK will meltdown a little bit more.It wasn't a shot though. It was going away from the goal, but Mignolet decided in his own little world to put a hand out and hit it towards his goal. No way it was offside imo
Was he behind the ball when it was passed?Why was Welbeck not given offside when he tapped in that goal last night?
The rules do not.
Go on then, show me the rule that says direction of a pass matters? It doesn't. Position of the ball relative to a players position matters. A ball can be played backwards and a player can be offside.
Prove it to me then? Because I'm not.Mate, you're wrong.
Was he behind the ball when it was passed?
The goalie is playing them onside.