R'hllor
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2013
- Messages
- 15,461
This never happened to me before,whats the next step? Should i act like i did a jinx on purpose and reply to you with "You`re welcome"?

Last edited:
The goalie is playing them onside.
Unless the rule has changed, passing the ball backwards cannot be offside from what I understood
Then they're not offside. As I said player position relative to the ball as it's played matters. If you're behind the ball it's not offside. The actual direction of a pass doesn't matter. If a player is ahead of the ball when it's passed they're offside no matter the direction of the pass.Yep, just like Brittos was today.
Just the one relegation in his first 6 months.
Is Britos blocking Mignolet?
Crazy.Weird that old wolf eyes decides to start with Batshit instead of Morata.
Fantastic to watch, sure. There is such a lack of defensive ability from every side so far. Only Mane's and Lacazette's were goals of individual attacking quality, virtually every other goal has been from sloppy mistakes or set-pieces that were very avoidable.How can people watch these games and think "there's such a lack of quality here", it's been fantastic stuff.
He has not exactly had a pre-season has he? How the hell does Conte expect him to get up to speed. He is on a collision course with the owner here.£70m Morata on bench. I am glad Conte selects his players of performance rather than price tag because Morata has been proper shite in pre season. Other than that, I am suprised at the ladk of depth in the Chelsea squad. Seems like many academy players in the squad for Chelsea.
It's great but it'll truly start after the United game.
Because that's not a rule. The direction of the ball doesn't matter.
Weird that old wolf eyes decides to start with Batshit instead of Morata.
Michy is a better option right now. More familiar with the league£70m Morata on bench. I am glad Conte selects his players of performance rather than price tag because Morata has been proper shite in pre season. Other than that, I am suprised at the ladk of depth in the Chelsea squad. Seems like many academy players in the squad for Chelsea.
The two things are not related.How can people watch these games and think "there's such a lack of quality here", it's been fantastic stuff.
You're and it's simple really.Prove it to me then? Because I'm not.
If you're ahead of the ball, you can.If the player who receives the pass is behind the passer then he isnt offside, so 99.999 percent of the time, when the ball is played backwards the player wont be offside!
You cant be offside if the ball goes backwards.
I am notYou're and it's simple really.
Thought it was in a back 3.Fosu-Mensah playing in the front 3?
Look at the rules.You're and it's simple really.
Google Fifa laws of the game and show me where it mentions direction of a pass.You are.
Exactly. It's a really simple concept.If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was behind the ball at the time, he's onside.
If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was ahead of the ball at the time, he's offside.
But...if you're ahead of the ball, and the ball is passed backwards...you'll never receive the ball...and never be offside. You will likely be in an offside position but if you don't physically receive the ball, you can fanny about all you want. Much to the annoyance of your teammates.If you're ahead of the ball, you can.
I am notthere's no rule that mentions of the direction of a pass. Just the relative position of players and the ball.
He's onside because he wasn't ahead of the ball.Isn't he onside given the ball came off the goalie first?
Eh people can turn around.But...if you're ahead of the ball, and the ball is passed backwards...you'll never receive the ball...and never be offside. You will likely be in an offside position but if you don't physically receive the ball, you can fanny about all you want. Much to the annoyance of your teammates.
If you're ahead of the ball, you can.
And if he's squarely in-line with the ball, he's onside?If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was behind the ball at the time, he's onside.
If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was ahead of the ball at the time, he's offside.
Yeah if the definition is not backward play of the ball, bur the relative position of the player then he is probably off-side and actively interfering with Mignolet.I thought he was onside as the ball went backwards, but Clattenburg say it's offside anyway. He should know the rules.
If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was behind the ball at the time, he's onside.
If the ball is played backwards and the attacker was ahead of the ball at the time, he's offside.