Peterson, Harris, etc....

There's an interesting video of him debating drugs with Peter Hitchens. Depending on which side of the debate you fall on, either Brand is hilarious and Hitchens bigoted, or Brand is a child in a man's body and Hitchens is the voice of reason.

If its the one where Hitchens was appalled at being put on the same show as Brand, it was pretty hilarious.
 
There's an interesting video of him debating drugs with Peter Hitchens. Depending on which side of the debate you fall on, either Brand is hilarious and Hitchens bigoted, or Brand is a child in a man's body and Hitchens is the voice of reason.


:lol: I'll check that out now. I actually think Brand would be a decent person to discuss drugs so could be interesting!!
 
He can also be a bit reactionary. I remember him advocating non-voting back in 2015...and then endorsing Labour after one chat with Ed Miliband. After the deadline for registering to vote had passed.

But, yeah, he generally means well. Seems to have largely disappeared in the last couple of years though.
He got married, had a kid and brought a farmhouse(I think), I like the guy but it's sort of clear he just really into trends rather than a concrete.
 
There's an interesting video of him debating drugs with Peter Hitchens. Depending on which side of the debate you fall on, either Brand is hilarious and Hitchens bigoted, or Brand is a child in a man's body and Hitchens is the voice of reason.



Peter Hitchens is a marvel. How someone can talk so much shite while sounding so confident while doing so, is something to be admired.

His car-crash, embarrassing clash with Matthew Perry on the subject (who isn't exactly a top intellectual) was pretty staggering to watch.



Hitchens is just a rent-a-gob for Little Englanders. The man thinks the Tories are so soft they might as well be socialists.
 
Hitchens really comes across poorly there. I don't have time right now to go digging through my old criminal law drug deterrence statistics but I might later.


I will add that often when we believe we're seeking deterrence through punishment, we are actually operating with a retributivist objective, even unbeknownst to ourselves.

Forever in your brother's shadow, Peter.
 
Peter Hitchens is a marvel. How someone can talk so much shite while sounding so confident while doing so, is something to be admired.

His car-crash, embarrassing clash with Matthew Perry on the subject (who isn't exactly a top intellectual) was pretty staggering to watch.



Hitchens is just a rent-a-gob for Little Englanders. The man thinks the Tories are so soft they might as well be socialists.

My God, is this man for real? Being an addict isnt just a lack of willpower. What a tool.
 
Last edited:
:lol: :lol:

Is it though?

If I may respond to that with a video.



That's one of the most truthful statements ever made. It really is.

One of the most disgusting things about Brexit was this idea that 'experts' are so cock-sure of themselves. Which really made me question how many experts these people had actully met.
 
Peter Hitchens is a marvel. How someone can talk so much shite while sounding so confident while doing so, is something to be admired.

His car-crash, embarrassing clash with Matthew Perry on the subject (who isn't exactly a top intellectual) was pretty staggering to watch.



Hitchens is just a rent-a-gob for Little Englanders. The man thinks the Tories are so soft they might as well be socialists.


"You're just a person who is talking who is wrong.":lol:
 

Troubling.

What resonated with me was that girl who said that she's scared to have a nuanced opinion. I actually shared that sentiment when I was at uni several years ago. It felt like some opinions were not allowed.
 
Peter Hitchens is a marvel. How someone can talk so much shite while sounding so confident while doing so, is something to be admired.

His car-crash, embarrassing clash with Matthew Perry on the subject (who isn't exactly a top intellectual) was pretty staggering to watch.



Hitchens is just a rent-a-gob for Little Englanders. The man thinks the Tories are so soft they might as well be socialists.

Hitchens has the audacity to call someone else 'smug'. What a pompous twat.

That was my first exposure to him and I have no desire to listen to him further.
 
Troubling.

What resonated with me was that girl who said that she's scared to have a nuanced opinion. I actually shared that sentiment when I was at uni several years ago. It felt like some opinions were not allowed.

Its the wave of the future on US campuses - shutting down all speech that doesn't conform to the authoritarian left's orthodoxy.
 
Hitchens has the audacity to call someone else 'smug'. What a pompous twat.

That was my first exposure to him and I have no desire to listen to him further.

The difference between him and his brother is pretty stark. Its like they were separated at birth and grew up in alternate universes.
 
The difference between him and his brother is pretty stark. Its like they were separated at birth and grew up in alternate universes.

Funny thing is Peter was a pretty big socialist in his early years, changed starkly as time went on though. He's almost interesting to listen to for how truly bizarre and arbitrary some of his opinions are.
 
The Republican party holds the presidency and both chambers of Congress
The Supreme Court just banned class action for workers who signed arbitration agreements.
Fox News is the #1 news channel in the US.
Sean Hannity is the #1 talk show host in the US
Sinclair owns the local news channels
Talk radio has been dominated for eons with conservative nuts like Limbaugh.
Koch brothers are firing and hiring professors at University at will, to suit their agenda.

Yet, it's the 'authoritarian left' who is trying to clamp down on free speech. Makes perfect sense.
 
Funny thing is Peter was a pretty big socialist in his early years, changed starkly as time went on though. He's almost interesting to listen to for how truly bizarre and arbitrary some of his opinions are.

Yeah agreed. There's a certain entertainment value of listening to Peter. IIRC Christopher started out as a Marxist as well for much of his earlier days.
 
The Republican party holds the presidency and both chambers of Congress
The Supreme Court just banned class action for workers who signed arbitration agreements.
Fox News is the #1 news channel in the US.
Sean Hannity is the #1 talk show host in the US
Sinclair owns the local news channels
Talk radio has been dominated for eons with conservative nuts like Limbaugh.
Koch brothers are firing and hiring professors at University at will, to suit their agenda.

Yet, it's the 'authoritarian left' who is trying to clamp down on free speech. Makes perfect sense.

Its more of a college campus thing. The hard left has taken over.
 
The difference between him and his brother is pretty stark. Its like they were separated at birth and grew up in alternate universes.
My goodness I thought that Peter had a familiarity... had no clue that Christopher had a brother!

In light of that, what a disappointment. I found Christopher interesting to listen to. His brother, based on the 2 videos I've seen, definitely not.
 
The Republican party holds the presidency and both chambers of Congress
The Supreme Court just banned class action for workers who signed arbitration agreements.
Fox News is the #1 news channel in the US.
Sean Hannity is the #1 talk show host in the US
Sinclair owns the local news channels
Talk radio has been dominated for eons with conservative nuts like Limbaugh.

Koch brothers are firing and hiring professors at University at will, to suit their agenda.

Yet, it's the 'authoritarian left' who is trying to clamp down on free speech. Makes perfect sense.
The US has always had a shit taste in TV :wenger:

In all seriousness, these things swing in roundabouts. The Dems will be back in the next 2-6 years.
 
My goodness I thought that Peter had a familiarity... had no clue that Christopher had a brother!

In light of that, what a disappointment. I found Christopher interesting to listen to. His brother, based on the 2 videos I've seen, definitely not.

There's an entertaining debate between both of them where they debate religion on YouTube. Christopher takes it a bit easy on him imo.
 
I’d say given the above tweets, the Koch brothers are having a say in that.

Unfortunately, I don't think their best efforts will make much of a difference. We're going to see many more instances like at Evergreen, Berkley and other places since there are groups who want to snuff out any sign of debate that doesn't conform to their views.
 
Unfortunately, I don't think their best efforts will make much of a difference. We're going to see many more instances like at Evergreen, Berkley and other places since there are groups who want to snuff out any sign of debate that doesn't conform to their views.
What do you mean by “unfortunately”?
 
What do you mean by “unfortunately”?

I'm not talking about the bit of attempting to install preferred professors. They donate to quite a few Universities to balance out the hard left slant at most of them. However much they donate, its not likely they will succeed since most campuses are lopsidedly infested with leftist ideology to where alternate views that don't meet the orthdoxy aren't tolerated.
 



I can't imagine how anything would think "No Whites on Campus Day" is a good idea.
I can't even imagine what positives they think could possibly be achieved by that.

Unfortunately, I don't think their best efforts will make much of a difference. We're going to see many more instances like at Evergreen, Berkley and other places since there are groups who want to snuff out any sign of debate that doesn't conform to their views.

You used to have Walnut Creek as your location. How can you spell Berkeley wrong? :lol:
Also what examples are you talking about?
Despite what the perception was from the 1960s FSM, Berkeley's campus was nothing like that Evergreen article.
 
I'm not talking about the bit of attempting to install preferred professors. They donate to quite a few Universities to balance out the hard left slant at most of them.
The two are linked though, are they not? It’s basically like lobbying congressmen.
 
I'm not talking about the bit of attempting to install preferred professors. They donate to quite a few Universities to balance out the hard left slant at most of them. However much they donate, its not likely they will succeed since most campuses are lopsidedly infested with leftist ideology to where alternate views that don't meet the orthdoxy aren't tolerated.

I don't think they're doing it to provide 'balance' at all - they're doing it to further their own right-wing agenda. Again I don't see why it's unfortunate that they won't succeed considering they're fairly reprehensible figures.