Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
What the hell is the conference if not a resignation? Is she about to u-turn and go for another round of negotiation?
 
Is Gove dumb enough to take that hospital pass ?
he is slimey enough...
its either the PM admits she needs me to re-negotiate a better deal and although I dont like the deal Ill do it for the good of the country
(knowing the PM is toast before any negotiations can take place)
Or the PM wont let me re-negotiate it - its currently not good enough so Ive got to go as I believe in Brexit
 
Either the EU wants to work with us or they don't, if they want us to stay then what's the worth in forcing us to leave with no deal?

All this talk of how UK will get concessions, how much the EU need us. Is that leave date is set in stone with no room to maneuver?
"Forcing" :lol:

They didn't cause this, you did. You're forcing yourselves to leave.

And they (a) need you less than you need them and (b) certainly need you less than they need every other country who would certainly (and rightfully) demand similar concessions if they were to just bend over for all of your demands. The onus is on you to come up with a deal they'll accept and if you can't it's your fault. (By you I mean your politicians and Leave voters, not you personally, unless you voted Leave.)

Yeah it's just given it back to most of the countries it took it from :)
:lol::lol:
 
EU members aren't third countries, they are the ones who built these rules for themselves, the UK being a leading member when it comes to trade rules.

I don't see what your point is? After enacting A50, the UK is negotiating as a third country. Which is why accepting regulatory alignment doesn't make sense.

I think on the first point I would see it differently from yourself but that is open to argument and discussion.

However, surely you mean to say that the EU has been a different beast earlier than Lisbon? Maastricht and the Single European Act involved a greater consolidation of functions and powers at the European level than Lisbon, which basically was a consolidating treaty?

Sure. I said Lisbon because it's the most recent one.
 
I love this argument about the EEC - EU . More drivel.
I voted in the 1975 referendum and I wasn't voting to have a supply chain for my Nissan car in Sunderland.
The same arguments were around then about FoM, sovereignty etc. Same old crap recycled 40 years later.
 


won't be a resignation, Gove announced? People seem to think he won't take the role.
 
I'm guessing she just lays out her timeline on a parliamentary vote.
 
I don't see what your point is? After enacting A50, the UK is negotiating as a third country. Which is why accepting regulatory alignment doesn't make sense.

You said that Brexit was about sovereignty. Which means that you expected to gain more sovereignty, the issue is that you didn't lose any sovereignty as a member of the EU. As members of the EU, the UK were decision and policy makers.
 
I'm hoping for sod this for a game of soldiers,May resigns, to spend more time running through wheat fields.
 
I'm not saying he should back remain. I disagree strongly that he should be called an 'honest' politician when Labour have claimed when pushed (they've hid as much as they can from the issue) that their Brexit would protect jobs whilst fulfilling the democratic mandate to leave. They've claimed that they'd win an impossible deal the same as the Tories, that's when they'e not been in hiding on the most important British issue since World War 2.

If he was honest he'd lay the cards on the table and tell the electorate that they would fulfill the democratic mandate to leave but it will hurt and that people will lose their jobs. That would be honest.

Labour might well win the next election but you'd get short odds on a garden gnome beating the Tories next time round.

I’d use the term principled more than honest with Corbyn – Relative to most politicians that is. He’s definitely learning to play the game now though.

Everything you’ve described is simply politics. He’s playing to the fantasy land that the Brexit deal was knowing it’s not a deal he’ll ever be accountable for. He knows taking a hard stance either way would alienate 50% of the country and potentially destroy any chance of beating the Tories down the line.

Why would he take the honest approach? That is literally what May has just done and 90% of the country is tearing into her.

To be honest would be for him to say “I’ll honour the wishes of the British people but I would also add that you’re a bunch of stupid c*nts.”
 
"Forcing" :lol:

They didn't cause this, you did. You're forcing yourselves to leave.

And they (a) need you less than you need them and (b) certainly need you less than they need every other country who would certainly (and rightfully) demand similar concessions if they were to just bend over for all of your demands. The onus is on you to come up with a deal they'll accept and if you can't it's your fault. (By you I mean your politicians and Leave voters, not you personally, unless you voted Leave.)
Yea I know, it was rhetorical. Decent summary tho ;)

I often forget sarcasm etc gets lost on the internet. I wasn't being serious...
 
I love this argument about the EEC - EU . More drivel.
I voted in the 1975 referendum and I wasn't voting to have a supply chain for my Nissan car in Sunderland.
The same arguments were around then about FoM, sovereignty etc. Same old crap recycled 40 years later.

I suspect that a lot of people don't know the chronology. They only recently learned about the commission(administrative arm) and think that it's a new thing when in reality it's there since the early 50s. The preamble of the Treaty of Rome(1957) makes it clear, not only it stipulates that the members are determined to lay the foundations for an ever-closer union but also mentions the ambition to develop and strengthen the union economically and socially.

The EU has never been a secret.
 
Last edited:
I suspect that a lot of people don't know the chronology. They only recently learned about the commission(administrative arm) and think that it's a new thing when in reality it's their since the early 50s. The preamble of the Treaty of Rome(1957) makes it clear, not only it stipulates that the members are determined to lay the foundations for an ever-closer union but also mentions the ambition to develop and strengthen the union economically and socially.

The EU has never been a secret.

The sovereignty question is in any event a red herring, of interest to a handful of fanatics like Bill Cash. The referendum was won on the basis of (lies about) immigration.
 
Hilarious if this is a press conference to basically say, “Come on then cnuts! Bring it on!”
 
The sovereignty question is in any event a red herring, of interest to a handful of fanatics like Bill Cash. The referendum was won on the basis of (lies about) immigration.

Honestly I don't know what was THE basis for the referendum. But I have heard too many people in all of Europe claim that the EU changed its initial plan, it's one incredible lie because you can easily prove that it's wrong, it's on the second page of the Treaty of Rome, the first page has "The Treaty of Rome - 25 March 1957" written on it, you don't even need to make an effort and read dozens of pages.
 
Fair fcuks to her. :lol:

They’ll be using her as an example of stubborn resilience in future politics classes.
 
Nah this isn't a resignation speech.
 
At least she has the balls to set out a plan & pursue it (even if I don't agree with it). It's more than what cuntface Mogg or BoJo have.
 
At least she has the balls to set out a plan & pursue it (even if I don't agree with it). It's more than what cuntface Mogg or BoJo have.

You mean like her red lines :lol:

What the feck was that? Pointless nonsense to try and create a headline above the commons debate
 
At least she has the balls to set out a plan & pursue it (even if I don't agree with it). It's more than what cuntface Mogg or BoJo have.
Yeah but her plan is the equivalent of a shit in a fish bowl.
 
At this point, the Conservatives' main and only priority is not what is best for the country, it’s staying in power. In terms of Brexit and May's position, they will do whatever they think best helps them to do that.
 
She's getting slaughtered and basically avoiding every question that's being asked.
 
She's a sweaty quavering mess.

The line she just trotted out that no one has given her an alternative. No one else has been negotiating with the EU you idiot