Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .


Wonder why he achieved zilch in 2 years. Clown.


This is the hopium the government are operating with due to the agreed withdrawal agreement being so abysmal it will never pass. I do not believe the EU will ever reopen the agreement to make the legally binding changes that are required for it to get through.

Essentially they don't have a choice but to believe the EU will agree to change it though as the alternatives are no deal, or no Brexit, and Corbyn probably sauntering in to number 10 shortly afterwards.

May is trying to bribe Labour MPs it seems to drum up some extra support. I wonder if she might get something non legally binding again, not in the agreement text and try to force that through with her original deal as a last desperate attempt.
 
You've got a fair point there. When people are taking about how the EU will do this or do that, do they ever specify who they are taking about? You have the individual countries, them you have the EU government. They are all different entities with their own needs, agendas, problems...

Quite.

Furthermore the EU27 have no need to stockpile food or medicines because the frictionless borders with all other member states will remain open. Without a deal there will be no frictionless border between the UK and any other country.
 
What I was wondering today was, if the UK leaves with no deal, does that put Ireland on a collision course with Brussels? Presumably Brussels would insist they implement customs and immigration controls as required by EU law, and the Irish government would be under huge domestic pressure to avoid a visible border?
That would be out of our control though, this isn't.
IMO Irish politicians are thinking if there is a hard Brexit then it will trigger a border poll and they can then let the public decide what's next.
 
What I was wondering today was, if the UK leaves with no deal, does that put Ireland on a collision course with Brussels? Presumably Brussels would insist they implement customs and immigration controls as required by EU law, and the Irish government would be under huge domestic pressure to avoid a visible border?

It's not EU laws that requires it but WTO rules.
 
I forget. What is the beef with the border in the sea rather than physically on land.

Because it would place NI outside of the rest of the UK which would not be tolerated by Parliament.
 
I would love to have a debate with JRM, Farage and Davis, completely wipe out all their arguments so easily.

Having read a lot of your posts on this subject I am confident that you would do exactly that.
Would make a brilliant Question Time.

I can just picture Farage with his mouth moving but no words coming out...
 
Having read a lot of your posts on this subject I am confident that you would do exactly that.
Would make a brilliant Question Time.

I can just picture Farage with his mouth moving but no words coming out...

On the condition that they were forced to answer the questions. A lie detector connected to each of them would be an added bonus.
 
If brexit has shown anything it’s that England doesn’t really give a shit about the union, it’s England first. So why shouldn’t the scots get another ref?

No objections on my part (in fact they should escape the madhouse if they can), I am just thinking it through from the point of view of the government in Westminster.
 
If brexit has shown anything it’s that England doesn’t really give a shit about the union, it’s England first. So why shouldn’t the scots get another ref?

Bit harsh.
Why would English people not put their country first.
Personally, I gave no thought to Wales or Scotland or N Ireland when I voted and I am pretty sure that they voted thinking of themselves first.

Did Scots not do the same in their own referendum.
 
Bit harsh.
Why would English people not put their country first.
Personally, I gave no thought to Wales or Scotland or N Ireland when I voted and I am pretty sure that they voted thinking of themselves first.

Did Scots not do the same in their own referendum.

Better_Together_cover_image.jpg
 
It's not EU laws that requires it but WTO rules.
There's a lot of nuance there actually: https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com...o-require-countries-to-control-their-borders/

Where Ireland would come up against EU rules if it tried to avoid a border is the new Union Customs Code (UCC), which governs the customs regulations and implementation by EU member states. This requires member states to apply a number of precise border controls, data collection and centralised data sharing to certify imports as qualifying for the 'free circulation of goods', among a bazillion other things.

RedCafe, come for the football, stay for the international customs law discussion.
 
There's a lot of nuance there actually: https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com...o-require-countries-to-control-their-borders/

Where Ireland would come up against EU rules if it tried to avoid a border is the new Union Customs Code (UCC), which governs the customs regulations and implementation by EU member states. This requires member states to apply a number of precise border controls, data collection and centralised data sharing to certify imports as qualifying for the 'free circulation of goods', among a bazillion other things.

RedCafe, come for the football, stay for the international customs law discussion.
So it isn't just a case of two different regulatory requirements so there has to be a border?
 
There's a lot of nuance there actually: https://tradebetablog.wordpress.com...o-require-countries-to-control-their-borders/

Where Ireland would come up against EU rules if it tried to avoid a border is the new Union Customs Code (UCC), which governs the customs regulations and implementation by EU member states. This requires member states to apply a number of precise border controls, data collection and centralised data sharing to certify imports as qualifying for the 'free circulation of goods', among a bazillion other things.

RedCafe, come for the football, stay for the international customs law discussion.

There are no nuances, without an agreement and without customs control both the EU and the UK are open to every other markets under the most-favoured nation rule. It's not even a debate to make.
 
There are no nuances, without an agreement and without customs control both the EU and the UK are open to every other markets under the most-favoured nation rule. It's not even a debate to make.
You misunderstand me. The EU would not have to wait for some lengthy two year MFN disputes process at the WTO to compel Ireland to enforce its external EU border like you implied. The EU has its own customs regulations (the UCC) which it would enforce.
 
You misunderstand me. The EU would not have to go through some lengthy two year MFN disputes process at the WTO to compel Ireland to enforce its external EU border like you implied. The EU has its own customs regulations (the UCC) which it would enforce.

I didn't imply anything.
 
What I was wondering today was, if the UK leaves with no deal, does that put Ireland on a collision course with Brussels? Presumably Brussels would insist they implement customs and immigration controls as required by EU law, and the Irish government would be under huge domestic pressure to avoid a visible border?

It's not EU laws that requires it but WTO rules.

...

I didn't imply anything.

What were you trying to say about WTO and Ireland then? It is EU law that explicitly requires the enforcement of an external border (in very specific ways), and WTO rules in a very loose implicit kind of way.
 
Any remainers moved to europe since 2016?
Not to Europe but my wife is Canadian. She'd love to move back but never seriously mentioned it until after the Brexit vote. Even then I wasn't that keen on a move until the past few months. I'm seriously thinking about it now.
 


Wonder why he achieved zilch in 2 years. Clown.

Does anybody honestly believe the EU have more to lose than the UK? It's that kind of thinking that has got us into this position in the first place. If I didn't live in the UK id love for the EU to prove him, and those like him, completely wrong.
 
Any remainers moved to europe since 2016?

I know a few people who have moved permanently and got French citizenship since 2016 as a direct result of the vote. They used to split their time between London and France. And we are getting Irish passports for my wife and son. I don't qualify :(
 
Absolutely. He knows well that thousands have left too.

Edit: it's actually estimated to be closer to 300,000. So count me as one of THEM.
The question that should be asked is not how many affluent, sensible people will the country be losing but how many people, that had previously left to live in Europe are now going to be forced to return.
 
...



What were you trying to say about WTO and Ireland then? It is EU law that explicitly requires the enforcement of an external border (in very specific ways), and WTO rules in a very loose implicit kind of way.

That these rules aren't an issue here. Within the UCC, a country that doesn't enforce properly the rules would simply allow the usage of temporary internal borders by the other member states. In the case of Ireland it would be relatively easy since it's an island everything that goes to the continent transit through airports and ports where custom offices are situated. The issue would only be with transit north/south which isn't an issue for the rest of the EU outside of MFN and trade discrimination.