Irwin99
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2018
- Messages
- 9,919
How's Blind doing at Centre back? Always liked the guy, a good pro.
Impeding the goalkeeper in an offside position, therefore he's active. Doesn't have to be a foul to be impeding.
The guy wrestling Curtois was clearly offside.
Doubt the referee was looking at offside, he was probably confirming that the Ajax player was interfering with play."Clearly" . It was millimeters.
Haven't really tested him yet.How's Blind doing at Centre back? Always liked the guy, a good pro.
Yeah maybe more that or humping
You mean Courtois jumping on him
He was in contact with Coutois, therefore he was active. Pretty simple really...He wasn’t wrestling Courtois, he was in front of him. From the moment of the second header he did not interfere with the play at all. He didn’t stop Courtois moving backwards and he didn’t move towards the ball.
It’s an awful decision.
Ajax have no business competing with Real. Calls going against them are going to be killer.
Bit of a late bloomer, right?Delaney looks good.
Doubt the referee was looking at offside, he was probably confirming that the Ajax player was interfering with play.
VAR don’t need the ref to disallow a goal for offside.It was written offside there
Real Madrid getting a dodgy call in CL, of course of course
Well we've been excellent..
.. at kicking Dortmund players. Otherwise really poor, tbh. Nothing going in an attacking sense and I don't see the point in 3 centre backs with the way Dortmund are playing, Vertonghen is lost out on the left as well. Poch needs to switch the system up at HT.
We've pressed well I guess. That's about it.
He was in contact with Coutois, therefore he was active. Pretty simple really...
Because of his position, he limited Curtois possibilities to move, to stop the goal etc and that’s why it is offside.He wasn’t wrestling Courtois, he was in front of him. From the moment of the second header he did not interfere with the play at all. He didn’t stop Courtois moving backwards and he didn’t move towards the ball.
He interfered with Courtois before the header, not after.
It’s an awful decision.
Well we've been excellent..
.. at kicking Dortmund players. Otherwise really poor, tbh. Nothing going in an attacking sense and I don't see the point in 3 centre backs with the way Dortmund are playing, Vertonghen is lost out on the left as well. Poch needs to switch the system up at HT.
We've pressed well I guess. That's about it. Dortmund are dull, I thought they were meant to be this balls to the wall exciting side? More of a German Chelsea (under di Matteo) than anything else.
Bit of a late bloomer, right?
He’s stood directly in front of him (in his eyeline), he’s active under the current offside rules.No... he was with his back turned to Courtois the moment the ball was headed. He did not stop Courtois from going backwards to save it. He didn’t interfere with the play
He was in contact with Coutois, therefore he was active. Pretty simple really...
How many ties over these winning years have they won because of refs? The Bayern games in particular are usually scandalous.
How's the boy wonder De Ligt doing tonight ?
I don’t really understand what you’re getting at. When Taglafico heads the ball the Ajax player is offside.But if he was on contact with Courtois before Tagliafico gains the header, and he wasn't offside there... is that an offside interference?