Thanks! And what about news from the outside? Any idea?Apart from the financial hit to the currency, I don't think anything has changed dramatically yet. But as soon as the SWIFT ban hits most things are expected to start getting scarce and expensive.
No. In WWII, Britain was supplied by the US before the US ever got into the conflict. There were also wars fought by countries supplied by bigger powers throughout the entirety of the Cold War.What if they are supplied by that person's.
I suppose that's what I'm having a hard time with, distinguishing the line between being actively aggressive and being defensive as NATO want to be.
I'd say supplying weapons in the open is aggressive, but hopefully Putin doesn't!
But I have had some good answers to my questions from various on here, so that's much appreciated.
No one does land stealing better than Israel.Why's that?
I have no idea. I live in California, haha.
No. In WWII, Britain was supplied by the US before the US ever got into the conflict. There were also wars fought by countries supplied by bigger powers throughout the entirety of the Cold War.
I very much doubt that any rollback would happen under Putin. Why would he give any amount of freedom back when he had already took it?
We have too many commies in this place.I have no idea. I live in California, haha.
Well it took the US/UK 3 weeks to take Baghdad. It's the media that controls the narrative so they are playing it hard that Russia is struggling, the same media at that time weren't saying that the US/UK coalition were struggling (although I'm sure Iraqi state media was!).
You'd figure given how we're being told Russia is so shit at this war thing that the EU would be less fearful about attacking them. They might throw a nuclear bomb on themselves.
This is a massive fecking army, they'll take over eventually. The EU won't do anything, that's the sad reality, I just hope the Ukrainians don't let them sleep easy for the time they are there.
Baghdad is over 600km away from Kuwait, Kyiv is 90km away from Belarus. So of course it would take longer to reach Baghdad.
US and their allies lost 172 soldiers (and around 20 Kurtish allies but they were not under their command) to overthrow Sadam. Russia has already lost a few thousand soldiers in this.
I think that the US lost 4 tanks and 8 aircraft during the invasion. Russia has lost hundreds of tanks (for more than 80 there is photo evidence) and likely a few dozen aircrafts.
This invasion is about spheres of influence.
Putin/Russia is not going to just withdraw without NATO recognizing Russia's voice in the region going forward.
Sanctions alone wont cut it.
It couldn’t be more true. And Russia was a pretty totalitarian state already, but this is different.Sorry I just meant that Russia stepping into a totalitarian political situation, is that something that's a western narrative whilst the reality on the ground might be different?
Probably over the top in my original comment.
What I'm curious to know is are the Russian casualties as high as what's said on social media or is it a bit of posturing. There is definitely a move by the west to make Russia look incompetent via information/misinformation. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle as always. Don't get me wrong I hope Ukraine hold them off for as long as it takes (with as little casualties on both sides as possible). I'm just skeptical that Russia are doing as poorly as they say.
I have no feckin' idea why, but I thought you were @harms. WTF? There isn't even an H in that post
It started in Russia. In Nizhnekamsk, workers at the Hemont plant went on a spontaneous strike because they were not paid part of their salaries due to the sharp collapse of the ruble.
Is that, er, the door? I'll just be, you know, heading that, er, way. Now. Bye!…yes there is.
Sorry I just meant that Russia stepping into a totalitarian political situation, is that something that's a western narrative whilst the reality on the ground might be different?
don't mean to be that guy but surely this could have been done over video conference?
Yep they’re good at land grabbing …but nobody fecks with IsraelNo one does land stealing better than Israel.
Dont think US is in the mood to pander to any Russian demands. You also usualy make these demands from a position of strength, not whatever Putin is right now in.Shuttle diplomacy, I guess.
I would be surprised if one of Russia's requests won't be US removing nuclear weapons from Europe. Which might be ok, considering that US can hit Russia from the US, B2s and subs.
But I also think that most of US nukes in Europe are tactical, which would put the US at disadvantage if Russia uses a tactical nuke in Europe (tit for tat and all that).
It couldn’t be more true. And Russia was a pretty totalitarian state already, but this is different.
Shuttle diplomacy, I guess.
I would be surprised if one of Russia's requests won't be US removing nuclear weapons from Europe. Which might be ok, considering that US can hit Russia from the US, B2s and subs.
But I also think that most of US nukes in Europe are tactical, which would put the US at disadvantage if Russia uses a tactical nuke in Europe (tit for tat and all that).
Mayor of Mariupol in CNN now basically confirming the Russians used the ceasefire to lure citizens into the open, then attacked them.
Pretty obvious what the Ukrainians were trying to invoke when highlighting Babyn Yar getting some collateral damage too.I wonder what happens if the Americans start asking Israel "mate what the absolute feck?!"
We won’t intervene militarily even if it turns into a genocide in Ukraine. That’s the protection a massive nuclear arsenal gives you unfortunately.Fecking hell. My biggest fear is that we need images of an actual genocide to force an intervention of any sort from NATO. We all fecked up by waiting for too long while massacres happened in Bosnia and in Kosovo back in the days.
It couldn’t be more true. And Russia was a pretty totalitarian state already, but this is different.
UK and France are nuclear powers on their own, but the US has nukes in Turkey, Italy and Germany. Lavrov already mentioned that it is time for the US to remove their nukes from Europe.I think UK and France have their own nukes not US nukes that you got in Germany and Italy? Can't see them giving up on those after being threatened with nuclear war for over a week, Russia won't give up on any of theirs.
Is that, er, the door? I'll just be, you know, heading that, er, way. Now. Bye!