GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
at the moment s United Russia holds 70% of the seats but 48 parties 6 of which have representation at the state duma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Russia
Kinda. Putin is certainly making it that way by suppressing opposition. It's not like in China where there's literally no attempt at democracy, but in Russia democracy is becoming more and more of a facade over time. Not only with political opponents being persecuted but with ever harsher measures for political protestors and dissenting voices.
There are multiple parties in the Duma, although United Russia makes up 3/4 of the seats. The problem is that opposition is suppressed, in state media and elsewhere. This isn't especially new in Russia, but Putin has certainly strengthened his grip on power, and is surrounded by allies who can't and won't challenge him.
You don't need champions league equipment to fill up a truck's fuel tank or keep the tyres from falling apart, or to keep secure comms. They are so bad at at the basics, it would have just meant their better stuff - assuming they have any - would have been stuck in the mud and abandoned instead.
at the moment s United Russia holds 70% of the seats but 48 parties 6 of which have representation at the state duma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Russia
Looking at their armored capability. I doubt they really had enough of the Premier League stuff to do the job anyway. While they have about 500 T-80’s in active duty and several thousand in reserve, they don’t want to use them because of how poorly they performed in Chechnya. They’ve got around 500-600 T-90s, some of which are in Ukraine, but they don’t want to fully commit those because then they’re stripping any units facing NATO borders of their best tanks, as the T-14 Armata hasn’t been produced in sufficient numbers to be combat ready yet.I was listening to someone on the radio who knows the Russian army stuff and was saying because they completely miscalculated the strength/will of the Ukrainian's - they literally sent their "Championship and League 1" equipment and left the "Premier League" stuff away which in hindsight was a mistake for them. Now they have to think about calling them out or find a way to end the war with out "losing"
Just thought it was interesting that they were so arrogant and didn't have a more suitable/close Plan B
Iraqi republican guard tank crews send their best wishes.That leaves them with the tried and true T-72s, which they have thousands upon thousands of, and which is the bulk of the armor you’re seeing in Ukraine.
Oh trust me, I’m not saying it’s the tank you want to be in on a battlefield in 2022, but it’s the one they’ve got.Iraqi republican guard tank crews send their best wishes.
Haha, yeah I know you didn't mean it in that sense. I just wanted to say something about the T-72's history.Oh trust me, I’m not saying it’s the tank you want to be in on a battlefield in 2022, but it’s the one they’ve got.
Yeah the T-72 hasn’t aged well... which has been apparent for awhile, as you point out. The little cages they’ve put on the top of the turret to stop the javelin missiles hasn’t aged well either.Haha, yeah I know you didn't mean it in that sense. I just wanted to say something about the T-72's history.
Oh trust me, I’m not saying it’s the tank you want to be in on a battlefield in 2022, but it’s the one they’ve got.
Popcorn.gif
Everything is correlated to everything else
![]()
How useful are tanks in this day and age anyway?Yeah the T-72 hasn’t aged well... which has been apparent for awhile, as you point out. The little cages they’ve put on the top of the turret to stop the javelin missiles hasn’t aged well either.
It's not exactly been a secret that conservatives and populist in the West have been doing Russia's bidding, has it?
Tanks have been called to be obsolete since their invention. The question isn't if tanks are useful, as the basic concept (protection for the crew, high mobility and massive firepower) will be attractive any time. That said a tank that's designed for massive tank battles like the T-72 isn't suited for urban warfare and similar engagements. The T-14 with its "Afganit" hard-kill systems against incoming missiles etc would perform much much better. But luckily the Russians aren't able to mass produce them (partially due to it relying on components from Italy and France that they can't get after the first sanctions 2014).How useful are tanks in this day and age anyway?
This CNN investigation on the bombing of the pediatric hospital in Mariupol is impressive. It has 2D and 3D mapping details of what happened and where videos were taken in the immediate aftermath. It's even more shocking when you put all pieces together.
When I see the long line of Kremlin mouthpieces spouting their shit time and time again after seeing that investigation, I swear that those deplorables (Nebenzya, Lavrov, Shulgin) all deserve to be lined up on their knees and then receive you-know-what as proper punishment when this will be over.
Cock sucking?
Already posted no doubt, but damn that was powerful. 29 million views already.
Already posted no doubt, but damn that was powerful. 29 million views already.
It’s like morbid fascination now….how low will it really go
It's 1970 technology though.
And the pure existence of active S-300 systems might be a reason why we still haven't seen any reports (except I missed them) of Russia using its strategic bombers. No attacks with Tu-160 or Tu-95, as those are exactly the kind of high flying planes that S-300 would target and destroy in a wide area. The Russian air force is still only flying low-altitude missions to prevent long range radar detection, as they still didn't manage to get rid of all Ukrainian air defense systems. Hopefully it stays this way, as otherwise the option of carpet bombings would exist for Russia.Russia is flying 70s era planes so I don’t see a problem really.
I'll correct that statement for them: Moscow Stock Exchange to resume tanking on Monday.
Oh trust me, I’m not saying it’s the tank you want to be in on a battlefield in 2022, but it’s the one they’ve got.
Popcorn.gif
Would you rather be holding a line / punching through a line with them or without them?How useful are tanks in this day and age anyway?
Yeah me too, but then I didn't realize it's down a lot since the Crimea invasion. Down 75% in the last 10 years or so.Feels like the Ruble has held up OK so far? I expected it to tank a lot further.
It just seems like you quickly end up a sitting duck with what modern infantry appears to be carrying.Would you rather be holding a line / punching through a line with them or without them?
I think the answer to that is still “with”.