Jim Beam
Gets aroused by men in low socks
You've been... Amadeused!!
Consistently shite, your posts are terrible.Why do I want recognition from people on this forum? If you checked my post history, I have been right moreso than I have been wrong when I got in an argument on here. Heck, people seem to have short memories because the same people who didn't take my post seriously when I stated that Ole wasn't the right manager are the same people who still doesn't take my post seriously. I am not bothered by that, which is why I have always remained consistent.
The performance regardless of the team level is still impressive and if you believe they are a level below championship side, then you must not watch the play as much.
Yea, psg has been consistent that is why they are walking the league and before the lost to rennes they had the longest win record of any top club this season. Moreover, I don't believe psg has lost at home yet this season. Can you verify that for a team that isn't consistent? They even manage to beat Manchester city at home as well.
Consistently shite, your posts are terrible.
I dispute the bolded part!Why do I want recognition from people on this forum? If you checked my post history, I have been right moreso than I have been wrong when I got in an argument on here. Heck, people seem to have short memories because the same people who didn't take my post seriously when I stated that Ole wasn't the right manager are the same people who still doesn't take my post seriously. I am not bothered by that, which is why I have always remained consistent.
The performance regardless of the team level is still impressive and if you believe they are a level below championship side, then you must not watch the play as much.
Yea, psg has been consistent that is why they are walking the league and before the lost to rennes they had the longest win record of any top club this season. Moreover, I don't believe psg has lost at home yet this season. Can you verify that for a team that isn't consistent? They even manage to beat Manchester city at home as well.
Why do I want recognition from people on this forum?
Ok prove it. I know you just love to wind me up because no one else has replied to my post more than you in the past couple of months, but I don't mind entertaining it just to see you perform some mental gymnastics.I dispute the bolded part!
Pretty sure that wouldn't hold up in a courtroom![]()
Especially when there's tangible evidence to prove otherwise!
I only have to go back to a post from the other day - something about Villa spending more during Pochs tenure time than Poch did at Spurs, this is false by the tune of circa £100m.Ok prove it. I know you just love to wind me up because no one else has replied to my post more than you in the past couple of months, but I don't mind entertaining it just to see you perform some mental gymnastics.
Regardless, i am surprised you are still so confident after backing Ole so much, even though I knew before hand that he wasn't the right manager. That is an argument for another time and I m pretty sure a lot of poch haters on here are just trying to derail his accomplishments yet offer no logical argument that points to other managers doing significantly better.
Heck, even when poch got knocked out of the Champions League, that wasn't even that bad compared to how our other managerial candidate did. E.g., ETH losing to the underdog and not walking their league, Ralf ragnick failing at United and not getting us top four, Conte poor start at spurs and level on point with a weaker squad in Arsenal in fourth despite being favorite, and tuchel recently loosing to brenford 4-1 and underperforming in the league.
You're feeling generous today geebs.6/10
All the ex pros have said Poch. There must be something about him that we as fans don’t see.There’s a tiny part of me that wants Pochettino to come here and inevitably fail just to put this Amadaeus fellas Poch agenda to bed once and for all.
All the ex pros have said Poch. There must be something about him that we as fans don’t see.
He doesn't get enough credit on here for his Spurs job. They had literally been in the CL once before he took over and he made them a regular, challenged for a league title and made the CL final all whilst being on a transfer budget well below his rival teams. Just go and look at the Spurs side he inherited when he took over he should have been nowhere near top 4.
All the ex pros have said Poch. There must be something about him that we as fans don’t see.
He doesn't get enough credit on here for his Spurs job. They had literally been in the CL once before he took over and he made them a regular, challenged for a league title and made the CL final all whilst being on a transfer budget well below his rival teams. Just go and look at the Spurs side he inherited when he took over he should have been nowhere near top 4.
To be fair it’s better than pretending they watch Dutch footballAll the ex pros have said Poch. There must be something about him that we as fans don’t see.
If Poch does go to United, I would definitely want him to succeed, and I actually think he probably would succeed to a degree here.There’s a tiny part of me that wants Pochettino to come here and inevitably fail just to put this Amadaeus fellas Poch agenda to bed once and for all.
Why do I want recognition from people on this forum? If you checked my post history, I have been right moreso than I have been wrong when I got in an argument on here. Heck, people seem to have short memories because the same people who didn't take my post seriously when I stated that Ole wasn't the right manager are the same people who still doesn't take my post seriously. I am not bothered by that, which is why I have always remained consistent.
The performance regardless of the team level is still impressive and if you believe they are a level below championship side, then you must not watch the play as much.
Yea, psg has been consistent that is why they are walking the league and before the lost to rennes they had the longest win record of any top club this season. Moreover, I don't believe psg has lost at home yet this season. Can you verify that for a team that isn't consistent? They even manage to beat Manchester city at home as well.
I agree, This is the point that drifts over a lot of peoples heads it seems.I think it’s simply PL experience. I remember a lot of media pundits going in hard on Poch when he first went to Southampton. At the end of the day as I have said before I really liked Poch but this whole *what he did at Spurs* thing is blown well out of proportion.
Redknapp had us on the up prior to his arrival and the vast majority of the players were already there. Most of Poch’s signings for us were utter shite and the time where he was playing the best football was with most of players he had inherited.
If you actually watch the games, PSG have not been consistently good for 2 seasons now under Poch (or one and a half seasons, whatever you want to call it). That is a fact, I'm afraid. You have to look at the overall performances, not just the results. He strikes me as a manager with something missing. He's definitely not elite. Good rather than great.
He will go in hiding.There’s a tiny part of me that wants Pochettino to come here and inevitably fail just to put this Amadaeus fellas Poch agenda to bed once and for all.
His biggest problem is his lack of pedigree to win a big game. During the spurs impressive CL run he could have stuck with the winning team but when Kane was back, he dropped Moura who had an impressive spell falling for media and probably pressure from external elements. If he had stuck with Moura maybe would have won the game and also would have shown he is a strong character. This one incident shows me he is someone waiting to be trashed by our squad with blames on bad trainings and tactics.
It will be hell. Most of us will have him on ignore but the ones that don’t will stink threads out replying to his tired wumming.There’s a tiny part of me that wants Pochettino to come here and inevitably fail just to put this Amadaeus fellas Poch agenda to bed once and for all.
All the ex pros have said Poch. There must be something about him that we as fans don’t see.
My heart skips a beat every time I see this thread bumped.
Liverpool had a much better side than Spurs regardless of whether Kane or Moura played. And Liverpool got that lucky penalty in the first minute anyway, had nothing to do with the forwards. Very hypothetical situation that they would have won with Moura playing.
Wouldnt have played with 10 men, given Kane was totally out of pace during the game. It makes difference in a big game especially against a pressing team like liverpool. Starting Moura would have given much better chance even with the lucky penalty awarded early in the game.
I would suspect it means that if they hired him, how would they fit him in to the new structure that we have with Murtough and Fletcher, ironically if Pochettino actually does want more old school manager responsibilities then ETH actually fits in with our new structure more than he does. If he wants the responsibility of transfers and youth etc where does that leave Murtough and Fletcher essentially, they'd have to find a balance or he just becomes a coach like ETH, though the article seems to say that's not Pochettino's preferenceAm I the only one who's had to read that a few times to understand what he means? Does he mean that United like the fact Poch is old school? Or is that what's putting them off?
He doesn't get enough credit on here for his Spurs job. They had literally been in the CL once before he took over and he made them a regular, challenged for a league title and made the CL final all whilst being on a transfer budget well below his rival teams. Just go and look at the Spurs side he inherited when he took over he should have been nowhere near top 4.
It's all hindsight isn't it, Liverpool win with Moura starting and everyone would have asked why the hell didn't he pick Harry Kane
Look at you a spurs fan talking senseI think it’s simply PL experience. I remember a lot of media pundits going in hard on Poch when he first went to Southampton. At the end of the day as I have said before I really liked Poch but this whole *what he did at Spurs* thing is blown well out of proportion.
Redknapp had us on the up prior to his arrival and the vast majority of the players were already there. Most of Poch’s signings for us were utter shite and the time where he was playing the best football was with most of players he had inherited.
He doesn't get enough credit on here for his Spurs job. They had literally been in the CL once before he took over and he made them a regular, challenged for a league title and made the CL final all whilst being on a transfer budget well below his rival teams. Just go and look at the Spurs side he inherited when he took over he should have been nowhere near top 4.
I think it’s simply PL experience. I remember a lot of media pundits going in hard on Poch when he first went to Southampton. At the end of the day as I have said before I really liked Poch but this whole *what he did at Spurs* thing is blown well out of proportion.
Redknapp had us on the up prior to his arrival and the vast majority of the players were already there. Most of Poch’s signings for us were utter shite and the time where he was playing the best football was with most of players he had inherited.
Did he have Modric? Bale for only one season?
Two massive players for Redknapp so Poch didn't really inherit that team.
Is that was suggested?
Pochettino inherited Kane, Rose, Walker, Dembélé, Eriksen, Vertonghen and Lloris. Which was the backbone of his team, to that Spurs added Alli, Son, Alderweireld and Moura.
There are three important facts about Spurs and Pochettino, he inherited a young and talented team. He is not responsible for the good and bad signings since it wasn't his job. He did a good job with the players at his disposal but it wasn't exceptional or miraculous.
There are three important facts about Spurs and Pochettino, he inherited a young and talented team. He is not responsible for the good and bad signings since it wasn't his job. He did a good job with the players at his disposal but it wasn't exceptional or miraculous.
Yeah it was. The poster said he inherited a Redknapp team that was playing well and on the up.
That's partly true but it was Redknapp's team minus Modric and mostly without Bale. Quite a difference for any club but especially one like Spurs.
Is that was suggested?
Pochettino inherited Kane, Rose, Walker, Dembélé, Eriksen, Vertonghen and Lloris. Which was the backbone of his team, to that Spurs added Alli, Son, Alderweireld and Moura.
There are three important facts about Spurs and Pochettino, he inherited a young and talented team. He is not responsible for the good and bad signings since it wasn't his job. He did a good job with the players at his disposal but it wasn't exceptional or miraculous.