How dare those Ukrainians fight back! This means war!
Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion
- Thread starter Wednesday at Stoke
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
How dare those Ukrainians fight back! This means war!
Global hegemony. When I say weaken I mean in the sense of power and influence politically not economically. Every billion the US government throws into Ukraine could limit their ability to influence other geo-political spheres through their foreign assistance spending. Not necessarily due to a lack of funds but a lack of will to spend more money from Congress. This functions as a way to weaken US foreign policy, especially seeing as there's no longer a Russian agent in the White House and the current President is clearly interested in re-establishing American influence across the world.
On the flip side, you can accuse the US of trying to stop any new emerging powers and protecting its global hegemony. I think it will be the US need to get used to the likelihood of a multi-polar world. Europe now knows that it has to be more independent after this invasion.
There will be the US, China and Europe as the dominant powers going forward.
The aqua-tractor is indigenous to the Black Sea, I believe there's a full skeleton in the National History Museum in London.
(Edit: I will sell it to you)
Last edited:
Can we resist the reflex to self flagellation on this just once?
I think this is a list of heavy weapons we have only recently decided to send and we don't have the logistics to move them as fast as say the US. We have been training the Ukrainian army through operation orbital since 2015 though. The weapons the Ukrainians had in their hands at the start of this war included thousands of UK anti tank and anti air missiles.
A stich in time saves nine and all that.
Zelenski isn't blocking UK representatives from going to Ukraine or complaining about the UK's lack of help is he? That's telling I think. In fact post Johnson's visit he was praising the level of assistance the UK is providing and actually used us as an example he hoped all of Europe would follow. I know its hard to take in but we might just be doing well in helping here. As unusual as that is.
Ukraine's President Zelensky to BBC: Blood money being paid for Russian oil
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61107725
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused European countries that continue to buy Russian oil of "earning their money in other people's blood".
In an interview with the BBC, President Zelensky singled out Germany and Hungary, accusing them of blocking efforts to embargo energy sales, from which Russia stands to make up to £250bn ($326bn) this year.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61107725
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has accused European countries that continue to buy Russian oil of "earning their money in other people's blood".
In an interview with the BBC, President Zelensky singled out Germany and Hungary, accusing them of blocking efforts to embargo energy sales, from which Russia stands to make up to £250bn ($326bn) this year.
That's a comedy right?
"Without any what do we call it? What are we waging?"
"Russian special military operation"
Russia continues to shell its own territories:
These false flags for domestic consumption gives us a hint that a further escalation of the war is inevitable. Likely with the idea of bombing Kiev and full mobilization.
These false flags for domestic consumption gives us a hint that a further escalation of the war is inevitable. Likely with the idea of bombing Kiev and full mobilization.
Last edited:
The idea they are fighting against NATO or NATO infrastructure is both hilarious and a convenient excuse for their failures.
They are just fighting against Ukrainian reservists supplied with anti-tank weapons, manpads and night vision goggles and they are still losing. Their lameness knows no end.
They are just fighting against Ukrainian reservists supplied with anti-tank weapons, manpads and night vision goggles and they are still losing. Their lameness knows no end.
Last edited:
That's what scares me. I know many will disagree with me but I can see Putin using tactical nukes in the Ukraine.
Why do I feel this will go even worse for Russia if they do go for full mobilisation?
First of all, calling reservists quickly becomes a huge drain on the economy. Not only are these people not working and paying taxes, now you also have to pay and feed them. Secondly reservists are largely untrained, less disciplined, harder to motivate (especially in an offensive war) and as a result they suffer higher casualty and desertion rates than the regular troops. That in turn saps morale even more, but it also creates an operational headache for command due to their untrustworthiness.
Sometimes it’s better to know that you have left a flank unprotected and make plans based on that, than believing that it is protected when in fact the battalion of reservists who mans it will flounder and desert the second they start coming under heavy fire.
The war will get bloodier and costlier if they commit reservists. But mostly for Russia. Ukraine is already all in.
But why is there any need to prepare the Russian public when most of them only know what the state-controlled media (which is now all of the media) allows them to know?
If he wanted to, Putin could use a tactical nuke on Kyiv and then use the state-controlled media to deride all Western claims about is as just more fake news.
What kind of rotten brain comes up with that? Did they use a lot of azbestos in the KGB during the 80s?
‘Fortress in a city’: steel plant becomes Ukrainian hold-out in Mariupol:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...l-plant-becomes-ukrainian-redoubt-in-mariupol
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...l-plant-becomes-ukrainian-redoubt-in-mariupol
Russia still isn't at war officially, which would result in a lot of different rules, mobilizing reservists etc. This is about preparing the Russian people for that.
The Russian public will have a breaking point. You can only hide what is really going on to an extent. I can guarantee that the pressure is growing on the Russian leadership.
Western news of their atrocities and losses is leaking in, of that I am sure. I have talked on the phone with two former colleagues from Russia, both were pro Putin just 2 years ago, this war has completely changed their view. They are disguisted by what's going on and never believed it would come to this.
This is the end of Putin according to them, l just hope he is removed from power before he does something even worse than what we have already seen.
Don't agree.
He and his generals have already scaled back on their invasion plans.
They know now that the objective is to take as much territory in the East of Ukraine.
And Putin will be able to claim victory with that. And they don't need to escalate to anything like the use of tactical warheads.
They have been and increasingly are suffering heavy losses.
The deployment of tactical weapons will not get them any closer to victory and will invite retaliation from the West.
He is looking for a way out, not an escalation.
To prepare them for a wider conflict that is no longer an ”operation” but a full on war. He obviously needs a “provocation” to do that, and the narratives by the clowns on the propaganda shows are greasing the skids for the public to buy into what they are saying. It’s just a more perverse version of what happens on Fox News when Trump’s White House wanted to push a narrative Republican voters who watch Fox would buy into. In both instances, propaganda specifically intended to influence a core audience.
To prepare them for a wider conflict that is no longer an ”operation” but a full on war. He obviously needs a “provocation” to do that, and the narratives by the clowns on the propaganda shows are greasing the skids for the public to buy into what they are saying. It’s just a more perverse version of what happens on Fox News when Trump’s White House wanted to push a narrative Republican voters who watch Fox would buy into. In both instances, propaganda specifically intended to influence a core audience.
Just searched one of the largest Russian social network (oddnoklasniki) for the posts that had the following formulation: “died during special military in Ukraine” - had around 50k hits. A lot of those might be duplicates and whatnot but the true number of causalities must be immensely large as often a single post reports on multiple deaths at once (also if you take into account those that don’t get reported at all).
Hope so.
Russia turning back the clock with the newest shipments:
Still these can inflict some damage if they are in working conditions obviously.
Still these can inflict some damage if they are in working conditions obviously.
You’re probably right, but that’s how Stalin overcome Hitler in WW2, basically through a share volume. This is going to be a meat grinder as you say though.
A senior Nato military officer estimated between 30,000 and 40,000 Russian battlefield casualties (dead, wounded etc), but that was more than 3 weeks ago and significantly less than the figures given by Ukraine at the time.
The total must now be at least 50,000, and I'd guess a fair bit higher.
I know war doesn't ever really make any sense but this is taking the piss isn't it?
Oh no, not the tractorial defence force!
The facial recognition? Seems like a logical move in order to foment discontent within Russia as well as give families some semblance of closure.
When was the last formal declaration of war? WW2?
Iraq-Iran in the 80s maybe?
Putin's assumptions?
- Ukraine would fall quickly.
- Minimal cost to Russian military.
- Europeans wouldn't do much.
- Sanctions-proof economy.