the hea
Full Member
There have now been 2 sightings of the Israeli made Amir MRAPs in Ukraine. Did Israel finally answer the call?
Probably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
Did you reply to wrong post?The advantage of taking Kherson is they can get to Crimea with them a it easier than before. If they take all of Kherson they will be in fantastic shape.
Another one is that Ukraine is now an eternal enemy of Russia. It wasn't like that before 2014.
I mentioned something like that a while ago as well. Another advantage for Russia is that they thus could have had a good and close relationship with the EU, which would have given Russia the geopolitical influence it craves and largely negated the need for a NATO - instead of the exact opposite that's happened now.What if Russia in 2014 actually decided to support Ukraine, build a friendly relationship with them, and help Ukraine be admitted into the EU? Ukraine would actually become one of the closest Russian allies, only if Russia behaved differently. And actually there was no real reason for Russia not to do that, they wouldn't lose anything by supporting a european path for Ukraine. Russia could make a lot of money selling gas and everyone would be happy. It was really stupid they decided to violently subjugate Ukraine instead, there was no real gain for Russia, whatever the outcome of this. It is not like Russia lacked space or resources. They only managed to alienate many countries.
Radar was big. That's an interesting question, I'd be interested to see a documentary about it. Most people are killed by small arms, it might just be the modern rifle.Probably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
Stinger would be my pick.Probably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
I mentioned something like that a while ago as well. Another advantage for Russia is that they thus could have had a good and close relationship with the EU, which would have given Russia the geopolitical influence it craves and largely negated the need for a NATO - instead of the exact opposite that's happened now.
This reads like one of those 'could the Nazis have won WW2?' hypotheticals, where someone outlines a path to victory that essentially requires the Nazis to not be Nazis at all.What if Russia in 2014 actually decided to support Ukraine, build a friendly relationship with them, and help Ukraine be admitted into the EU? Ukraine would actually become one of the closest Russian allies, only if Russia behaved differently. And actually there was no real reason for Russia not to do that, they wouldn't lose anything by supporting a european path for Ukraine. Russia could make a lot of money selling gas and everyone would be happy. It was really stupid they decided to violently subjugate Ukraine instead, there was no real gain for Russia, whatever the outcome of this. It is not like Russia lacked space or resources. They only managed to alienate many countries.
Aircraft and aircraft carriers is mine.Stinger would be my pick.
Tanks, look when they are introduced in the ww1 movie all quite on the western front, they were a game changer, to be more precise WW2 how they were used the allies didn’t expect them in the fashion they were used they expected conventional trench warfare taking years to grab ground, whereas tanks could move rapidly on unsuspecting soldiers.Stinger would be my pick.
The Trojan horseProbably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
Probably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
Barbed wire resulted in the WW1 fronts being bogged down for years.Probably a question for the military historians but what other weapons system has turned the tide on a conflict in such a way...save for the manhattan project which didn't turn the tide but sped up the inevitable, I think its the proximity fuze in the AA artillery during WW2. Overnight the Axis losses of aircraft increased by orders of magnitude. Also, the Stinger missile during the first Afghan War.
That man has some talent for making zero fecking sense and taking a long time to do itThey really are thick. Apart from anything, it's not much of a trap if you're broadcasting it to the world.
This morning few hours ago my dad died. Directly from PTSP and he already lost one leg (after Vukovar when you raped and killed everyone).
But you had to carry your grandma... And you lived in a basement? It is feckin hilarous comparing to what you did to everyone for around 4 years... You bombed the whole city for 3 months and then when you finally went in sing a song for the families that were in a hospital (there will be blood, there will be blood, we will kill Croats). But that is not all. Imagine how feckin stupid the whole country was when they think they didn't deserve it and thar NATO was bombarding you and without your fault.
And this is how Ukranians will feel.
Btw. if he this gent responds in any logical way (because I will not post anymore) this is the day they enter the city finally.
We will never forget. Ever.
I think it was the Sonar that changed the war in the Athlantic?Airborn radar via the invention of the magnetron turned the war in the atlantic.
The magnetron was later described by American military scientists as "the most valuable cargo ever brought to our shores".
These affected generations will never forgive most russians, but as someone with family from/in both countries, i would certainly hope that the future goes down a path where eternal enemy is something that can be avoided. Ideally Putin will fall and Russia will slowly democratize, hand over war criminals/punish those complicit at state level and pay massive reparations, setting the groundwork for an eventual relationship as Germany and their WW2 allies have with the rest of Europe today. of course it's far too early to talk about such things, and could easily end up much worse.
I am really surprised every time I read about "depleted stockpiles". First of all, it is hard to believe this, because the main US power is in the Air Force, and we have not used any Air Force weapons here. We have also not used any tanks or tank ammunition, because Ukraine's tanks are not compatible. And we have definitely not used any navy ammunition, and the US Navy has plenty of rockets and stockpiles. So, the "depleted stockpiles" can only refer to the artillery, which a very secondary weapon for the US, as far as I know.
The other thing is, why do the Americans need to have full stockpiles, if not for helping counter Russia? I mean, the reason we have stockpiles is exactly for what is happening now, right?
It reminds me of the earlier articles about Germany "worrying" about their stockpiles if they give any ammunition to Ukraine. What would Germany need their stockpiles for? It is not like Poland or China would invade Germany and they'd need their artillery ammunition, right?
Germany infiltration by the FSB is remarkably extensive
I am really surprised every time I read about "depleted stockpiles". First of all, it is hard to believe this, because the main US power is in the Air Force, and we have not used any Air Force weapons here. We have also not used any tanks or tank ammunition, because Ukraine's tanks are not compatible. And we have definitely not used any navy ammunition, and the US Navy has plenty of rockets and stockpiles. So, the "depleted stockpiles" can only refer to the artillery, which a very secondary weapon for the US, as far as I know.
The other thing is, why do the Americans need to have full stockpiles, if not for helping counter Russia? I mean, the reason we have stockpiles is exactly for what is happening now, right?
It reminds me of the earlier articles about Germany "worrying" about their stockpiles if they give any ammunition to Ukraine. What would Germany need their stockpiles for? It is not like Poland or China would invade Germany and they'd need their artillery ammunition, right?
US ammunition production, especially for the ground forces is only a fraction of what it used to be during the cold war days and it takes a long time to build factories and new production lines while the ammunition is needed right now.Agree, it sounds very nonsensical to me. Add to your reasoning that all of the US arms industry is privately owned... They will be chomping at the bit to produce and sell ammunition to the government as and when they decide to 'replenish' stocks.
Just the usual media dribble.
I deleted my earlier post about advances on the Kinburn Spit (part of peninsula west of Kherson) because I wasn’t sure about the source, but there’s more unconfirmed reports coming in about it so might as well share. That would mean they’re already across the water, so the vids with special forces/marines on boats might be legit and from that area.
Western sources have picked up this story.