SuperiorXI
Full Member
He ain't getting sacked
Worth mentioning that the Times updated their article on the Tuchel meeting. Now reporting he felt he would not be offered the gig after meeting Ratcliffe before then deciding to take the summer off.
I think it is clear Ratcliffe wants a new man in charge but there is nothing interesting out there. I think Ten Hag will stay and the hierarchy can reassess throughout the season.
YepNo, it literally sounds nothing like that. Did you actually read any of the articles?
Source?He ain't getting sacked
Ok, so what's going on? This is the exact same report as after McKenna. So either we had no intention of replacing Ten Hag and were just feeling out potential candidates or they have their eyes firmly set on one candidate. Southgate? Poch?
Good journos never reveal their sourcesSource?
Why?100%. But if they decide to keep him, he should consider walking.
Source?
Are they being forced to replace ETH? The way they are scrambling to find the right coach while keeping ETH in the dark looks like incompetence. And it’s going to look even worse if they settle for ETH in the end
Also having talks with managers of wildly different play styles is strange to me. Compare this to how Chelsea or Liverpool did theirs, it’s easy to understand the direction they were going with.
Read it how you want. I suppose it depends on the end outcome. If it was him or Ten Hag clearly we made a move for the former and it ended without a positive outcome. Both parties will want to save face and say it was them who ended it.So you didn't. Read the article.
We did not "fail" in a pursuit of Tuchel. We stepped up talks, which cemented our concerns we had from the deeper round in finding he wasn't adaptable, and dropped him.
It's also well reported from the times that Tuchel left feeling he wasn't going to be a leading candidate for the role.
Agree with this sentiment.
Yeah that absolutely reeks of a scattergun approach and total incompetence, no wonder people were worried after seeing how he run NICE
100%. But if they decide to keep him, he should consider walking.
The experts are still on gardening leave.Why is Ratcliffe having face to face meetings with managerial candidates? I thought we were leaving this shit up to the experts?
I think the club were so determined to avoid the perception of undermining the manager by sacking him in the week following the cup final, they didn't consider the alternative is likely worse. We're now in a weird purgatory where it doesn't look like we know what we're doing no matter what happens.
The briefs have been about making a 'considered' decision but it looks more like indecisiveness to me. Even the managers we're being linked with don't appear to meet similar criteria. If we're making a meal of a relatively straightforward decision like this one, I dread to think what player recruitment will look like for the rest of the summer.
Didn't someone post that their dad was playing golf with McClaren's dad and he said the club had asked Ten Hag to resign. The club is acting like they want Ten Hag to resign.
Before the FA cup final the word was that he was being sacked after the final. Dead man walking. Now it’s been two weeks of «ongoing reviews» where the claim is that we’re in talk with a bunch of other managers, to the point of Ratcliffe personally being involved in talks, and that the results of the reviews are soon to be in.
Piss easy being a journalist, it would seem.
Not sure why people actually bother reading the articles.
I agree. I think they were wrong not to make their decision in the week following the cup final.a few days or one week would've been absolutely fine though
it wasn't a choice between right away or weeks
Well it's obviously very unlikely but the club openly meeting with an other manager is certainly one way to push it.That was never going to happen. If there's one thing managers love is their compensation.
Well it's obviously very unlikely but the club openly meeting with an other manager is certainly one way to push it.
I have 2 pts.Yeah ridiculous he left the meeting feeling he was not going to offered the job, well why did you bother meeting him Ratcliffe if had no intention
Why did a golf club ask ten Hag to resign? And seriously - who has a talking golf club? Just imagine the howl everytime you smack the ball up the fairway.Didn't someone post that their dad was playing golf with McClaren's dad and he said the club had asked Ten Hag to resign. The club is acting like they want Ten Hag to resign.
We didn't make a move for Tuchel. We talked with him and decided against making a move. The articles are pretty clear in that.Read it how you want. I suppose it depends on the end outcome. If it was him or Ten Hag clearly we made a move for the former and it ended without a positive outcome. Both parties will want to save face and say it was them who ended it.
Unless there is a real first choice which emerges this week.
OkWe didn't make a move for Tuchel. We talked with him and decided against making a move. The articles are pretty clear in that.
Another public example was when the medical staff said Casemiro was fit, he got a second opinion in Brazil and it was discovered he was carrying a hamstring injury.
It’s all orchestrated by a vengeful DDG to get revenge on ETH for the way he left the club last summer. David’s been plotting and stewing all year!I want ETH out, but this is an absolutely despicable way to treat the manager of the football club.
Are these the only two occasions (Shaw and Casemiro) that have been reported or were there others?
Why? He is from a mega rich familly so dosnt need the money
Maybe we are just going to dither until Southgate becomes available