davisjw
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2007
- Messages
- 5,289
First off excuse me if this is being a muppet BUT I was reading IFFHS (International Federation of Football History and Statistics) on best Keepers of the century and our own (England's) Gordon Banks managed second whilst our own (United's) Peter Schmeichel ranked sixth (http://www.rsssf.com/miscellaneous/iffhs-century.html#worldkoc). Now I've only seen Banks in videos and have only read about him as I'm from a younger generation but from what I've scene and read I'm not entirely sure I would rank him the second best keeper of the century. He seems to have made some pretty big mistakes and quite often from what I can read about his life and games..
So I got to thinking about Schmeichel who is the best Keeper (to me) that I've had the honor of following over the years and can not imagine Banks being better upon my readings and videos..
Now am I just being an ignorant muppet because I wasn't around to watch Sir Gordon Banks or is the poll somewhat different then how others see it. And even though it's hard to tell for those of you who have seen Banks play live or have been able to follow him if he played during Schmeichel's days (or vice-versa) do you think there would of been a change in opinion? Could the other last in the other's days of football?
Cheers
So I got to thinking about Schmeichel who is the best Keeper (to me) that I've had the honor of following over the years and can not imagine Banks being better upon my readings and videos..
Now am I just being an ignorant muppet because I wasn't around to watch Sir Gordon Banks or is the poll somewhat different then how others see it. And even though it's hard to tell for those of you who have seen Banks play live or have been able to follow him if he played during Schmeichel's days (or vice-versa) do you think there would of been a change in opinion? Could the other last in the other's days of football?
Cheers