- Joined
- Dec 31, 2007
- Messages
- 88,252
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2022
He was fantastic tonight. Been a long time since I've seen a full-back get so badly traumatized.
Still had a majority of poor crosses. However, when he looks up and plays a pass instead he's much better as I've said before. Had a good game.
Someone in the match thread said that's 7 in 15 for Valencia now. Nice. Hopefully he can keep up that ratio and get 15+ goals.
Along with Lennon the best right winger in the league.
He plays as well as he did and you choose to say something like that, it says a lot about you and most if it's not good.
Slightly frustrating.
I'm definitely seeing that he's more effective with Rafael behind him offering overlapping runs and other options for him. Played superbly tonight and hopefully can go on a good run of form.
The only thing I'm worried about is the number of games he's playing. Is he really up for playing so many games like Evra?
I chose to mention his one downside along with his upside and praise him for a good game. Yes it does say a lot about me. I like to have the full picture not just the nice bits.
It probably says a lot about you that you felt the need to judge it too.
I chose to mention his one downside along with his upside and praise him for a good game. Yes it does say a lot about me. I like to have the full picture not just the nice bits.
It probably says a lot about you that you felt the need to judge it too.
How do you know the players just didn't run into the positions he played the balls into? (In the the forwards didn't make good enough runs etc) Maybe it just looked like bad crosses?..who knows. You see a lot of good crosses find no one - it doesn't mean it was a bad ball per say. That said I didn't see the game so my point might not be relevent.
Its all opinions at the end of the day. You should enjoy it more. We're talking about a kid who is progressing.
He was fantastic tonight. Been a long time since I've seen a full-back get so badly traumatized.
You chose to mention it first, which would imply it was the first thing on your mind. Which would also imply that you're happy to pick on his faults and are constantly focussing on them.
Seems highly unlikely you'd have done the same if Nani had the same game.
good one.
A good cross isnt putting the ball into an area regardless of whether people are around. You look up and you pick someone out. If you can put it right in front of their run, brilliant, but its useless crossing the ball to a certain area if the one guy in the box is 6 yards away. When Valencia keeps the ball on the ground with a pass you dont see him pass the ball into an area someone might be. He has his head up and picks a player out... And its not behind them, its in front of them where they can run onto it. Its that kind of and accuracy thats missing from his crossing.
good one.
A good cross isnt putting the ball into an area regardless of whether people are around. You look up and you pick someone out. If you can put it right in front of their run, brilliant, but its useless crossing the ball to a certain area if the one guy in the box is 6 yards away. When Valencia keeps the ball on the ground with a pass you dont see him pass the ball into an area someone might be. He has his head up and picks a player out... And its not behind them, its in front of them where they can run onto it. Its that kind of and accuracy thats missing from his crossing.
I laughed when Figueroa finally got forward in the 2nd half and Valencia ran around him and won possession back and you could just imagine Figueroa thinking 'Why don't you just feck off Antonio...'
And pretty much every other player in the league, which is kind of the point.
He's a better crosser than most.
You have him down as the best crosser at the club. I'm obviously not going to get any reasonable argument from you on this subject.
And you think it's too early to call him a reliable goalscorer.
Yes yes, I'm the one being unreasonable, you're completely unbiased.
![]()
If nothing else, this game should have told you that Rafael is a better crosser of the ball than Valencia. He'd be one of many, but it only takes one to prove you wrong.
It is very early to call Valencia a reliable goalscorer even though he's obviously done a very good job getting on the scoresheet so far. He's more convincing when he scores clean goals and not deflected ones.
If nothing else, this game should have told you that Rafael is a better crosser of the ball than Valencia. He'd be one of many, but it only takes one to prove you wrong.
It is very early to call Valencia a reliable goalscorer even though he's obviously done a very good job getting on the scoresheet so far. He's more convincing when he scores clean goals and not deflected ones.
His style of play might not be to everyone's tastes, but he's brutally effective on form. And he has the right attitude to the game, so he digs in when he's not. You can't ask for much more from a lad in his first six months at a team trying to win the title for the fourth year running, who's making a huge step up, and is being asked to replace arguably the best player in the world.
Like it only takes a couple of goals to prove you wrong, eh?
I'm not saying I see Valencia objectively, I don't see why I wouldn't since I was very unsure of him before this season but it doesn't bother me, but don't preach what you can't practice.
He's had a very good season for us, he's only getting better and I'm happy to look at the positives of him this season since there've been so many.
I'm definitely seeing that he's more effective with Rafael behind him offering overlapping runs and other options for him. Played superbly tonight and hopefully can go on a good run of form.
The only thing I'm worried about is the number of games he's playing. Is he really up for playing so many games like Evra?
If nothing else, this game should have told you that Rafael is a better crosser of the ball than Valencia. He'd be one of many, but it only takes one to prove you wrong.
Brilliant reasoning JB
Brilliant reasoning JB
Perhaps, although it can only be thought of as definitive evidence of Rafael's superior crossing ability in this particular game, which may or may not be yet more evidence of his superior crossing ability, overall.
To be fair, though, you could well be right. However, it's important to remember that the ball is often either played back to Rafael, or laid in to his on-running path, meaning that he is usually unchallenged, and has both the time and space to decide where to place the ball. He also arrives later and from a deeper position, meaning that he likely has a much better picture of what is happening in the box, and many of the strikers runs are likely to have already begun, meaning that he doesn't have to second guess — at least to the extent that Valencia does — where they might end up.
And he often crosses the ball from far fewer positions than a wide midfielder. If the ball is laid in to his path, as was the case for Rooney's goal, he simply played the ball square. If it is laid back to him, he generally curves the ball in to an area, which is certainly a skill, but not that difficult, in my experience.
Valencia often has none of those advantages. Starting from much further up the field, he usually has to wait until the strikers — who are often in line with him when he picks up the ball — start to make runs at varying angles, all of which he has to attempt to read. He also often has to beat a fullback, first, which means that it is far more difficult to lift your head, read the various runs, and then find a player. Unlike Rafael, Valencia likely has no idea where he will be able to release the ball from, so to pick out a man requires a lot more skill and judgment.
An example of the point that I am making would be to envisage Gary Neville — an excellent crosser of the ball — playing in Valencia's position and having to beat a man first of all. It's an unfair comparison, in other words, for both players, but it is fairly certain that Gary Neville would look a much poorer crosser of the ball if he did have to create the crossing angle himself.
Crossing a ball is actually a more difficult and complex task than many realize. "Picking out a man" often means that you have to successfully read where a run will end up, and then find that run, at the right pace, height, etc. If you can pick someone out who is level with you, in an area where they can score, that is far easier than finding some who needs to first find space, meaning that they may move in any direction, depending on the position of the defenders.
One of the reasons that Beckham is so good at crossing is because he doesn't need to beat a man, and he is also able to curve the ball from almost an angle in to dangerous areas. I wouldn't be surprised if Beckham admitted that with roughly 80% of the goals that he creates from crosses, he is simply playing the ball in to an area — knowing that players are in the vicinity, of course — rather than specifically looking to find a players head, or foot, etc.
Valencia is simply not that type of player, and the current strikers are not the type who can make an average or poor ball in to a good one, either — at least, not in the air.