Yeh, that was my point, guys - you all seem to think he's performed really well; I think he's had a very, very mixed season, and that includes a lot of real shockers. I'm not alone in my opinions, either, no matter how much his fans would love to paint me that way.
I never said he was a bad player, I just don't think he offers enough to be considered a Manchester United player.
And Brwned, why does it make me a WUM to compare new players to those of our great teams? Have our expectations dropped? Are we buying new players with the aims of making a merely "good" team now? I didn't say that if he couldn't get in he was a failure, but I do think we should be aiming for people of that calibre, given that our ambition should be to be the best and... well, those teams were indeed the best. Fact is, however, Valencia is nowhere near that level, and would seriously weaken any of those sides were he played in them.
He's so ludicrously one-dimensional and one-footed; he can look brilliant against sides that have no positional awareness whatsoever (like Wigan), where he can just stand in space and pick out passes, but in tight games he offers next to nothing. And his absolute refusal to use his left foot is really beginning to piss me off. There are amputees more two-footed than Antonio Valencia.
Also, MadDogg, he's as good as Kanchelskis? Seriously? I know some of you are desperate to believe he's been a roaring success (along with Berbatov, I suppose - I mean wow, those two have been unbelievably good), but that's just getting silly. It'd be like claiming Owen has been as good as Sheringham.