I said Guthrie was technically better than Anderson. And I haven't changed my mind.
Most of you said I was crazy then, but maybe you have changed your mind considering I have seen some of you saying Anderson is technically not good enough. Where are the ones who said Anderson's technique would improve?
Guthrie is technically very good.
Pato is a dangerous player who will score goals. His technique isn't brilliant. And his final ball was rubbish against us.
I'm not saying Delfouneso is much better than Pato, but in 5 years time, maybe even less, I think we would rather have Delfouneso rather than Pato. Maybe because hes English, this kind of attracts me to Delfouneso aswell.
But in terms of just ability, Delfouneso has the edge.
Physically, he has everything. Hes already 6 1", and will continue to grow. Hes also very quick and strong.
Technically, is where he is better than Pato. Hes a more clever player, but will also score all sorts of goals.