Nathan Delfouneso

I would take Delfouneso over Pato. So yes.

My word. Unbelievable, Jeff.

To those who complained about how his name is being pronounced, excuse my ignorance, how is it supposed to be said?
 
Another of Scholesy's supposed talents, who will probably disappear just like Guthrie, who was once among world's brightest midfielders, did.

I said Guthrie was technically better than Anderson. And I haven't changed my mind.
Most of you said I was crazy then, but maybe you have changed your mind considering I have seen some of you saying Anderson is technically not good enough. Where are the ones who said Anderson's technique would improve?
Guthrie is technically very good.

fecking ell Scholesy. To think I have actually agreed with you in an argument before.

How in the name of sane can you claim that Delfonso (feck the spelling) is better than Pato? :

Why don't you rate Pato either? His technique is brilliant, on Tuesday there was a huge punt up field which he brought down effortlessly and laid a ball to Ronaldinho. Just one example that should be enough to show you he is class.

Ignoring the Pato comment for its sheer ridiculousness

What is it that you are basing this view on Delfouneso on in particular? What marks him out as so special

Pato is a dangerous player who will score goals. His technique isn't brilliant. And his final ball was rubbish against us.

I'm not saying Delfouneso is much better than Pato, but in 5 years time, maybe even less, I think we would rather have Delfouneso rather than Pato. Maybe because hes English, this kind of attracts me to Delfouneso aswell.

But in terms of just ability, Delfouneso has the edge.

Physically, he has everything. Hes already 6 1", and will continue to grow. Hes also very quick and strong.

Technically, is where he is better than Pato. Hes a more clever player, but will also score all sorts of goals.
 
The brilliance of having Scholesy around is it makes up for the witness protection programme scheme that all the scousers of old have entered into this year.
 
Pato's technique isn't the best in the world, true, but it's miles better than Delfouneso.

Pato is also a really solid scorer, brilliant header, fantastic movement and blinding pace. He doesn't do stepovers, 50-yard passes, 40-yard shots or the first touch of a rapist. He's simply Theo Walcott done good and then some. Pato would get into plenty of squads around the world - Delfouneso can't even make the Aston Villa bench consistently.
 
I said Guthrie was technically better than Anderson. And I haven't changed my mind.
Most of you said I was crazy then, but maybe you have changed your mind considering I have seen some of you saying Anderson is technically not good enough. Where are the ones who said Anderson's technique would improve?
Guthrie is technically very good.





Pato is a dangerous player who will score goals. His technique isn't brilliant. And his final ball was rubbish against us.

I'm not saying Delfouneso is much better than Pato, but in 5 years time, maybe even less, I think we would rather have Delfouneso rather than Pato. Maybe because hes English, this kind of attracts me to Delfouneso aswell.

But in terms of just ability, Delfouneso has the edge.

Physically, he has everything. Hes already 6 1", and will continue to grow. Hes also very quick and strong.

Technically, is where he is better than Pato. Hes a more clever player, but will also score all sorts of goals.

Technically you're absolutely mental if you think that.

His technique is barely out of the Agbonlahor category.
 
I would take Delfouneso over Pato. So yes.

:lol:

fecking ell Scholesy. To think I have actually agreed with you in an argument before.

What'd you go and do that for?

Pato is a dangerous player who will score goals. His technique isn't brilliant. And his final ball was rubbish against us.

I'm not saying Delfouneso is much better than Pato, but in 5 years time, maybe even less, I think we would rather have Delfouneso rather than Pato. Maybe because hes English, this kind of attracts me to Delfouneso aswell.

But in terms of just ability, Delfouneso has the edge.

Physically, he has everything. Hes already 6 1", and will continue to grow. Hes also very quick and strong.

Technically, is where he is better than Pato. Hes a more clever player, but will also score all sorts of goals.

:lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Scholesy's banned from the reserve forum? That's a bit nuts, he hasn't been that bad.
 
We all know he's wumming

no-one can be that stupid

I am not wumming. You said this in the fix Liverpool thread:

I'd bring in:
Ambrose - Palace - 2.5m
Raul - Madrid - 4m
Dindane - Portsmouth - 4m
Haggalund - Fulham - 8m

Please, if you are saying I am stupid, then what does this make one who suggests the above?
 
I am not wumming.

Could I be unbanned from the reserves forum?

I hope not. It's bad enough you saying you hate our players, but then you bump one for Delfouneso (who missed an open goal from 3 yards out) yet say that Macheda won't make it and slate his overall play when he was probably the best player on the pitch today.
 
I'm not saying Delfouneso is much better than Pato, but in 5 years time, maybe even less, I think we would rather have Delfouneso rather than Pato.

Nope, sounds like he's saying something quite similar to what you said Rubberman.

You two should add each other on facebook and discuss your favourite footballers, and their techniques.
 
I dont think Scholesy is wumming, he just has the most bizzare opinion on the whole forum.

It would be a shame if he was banned actually, at least he brings debate - and entertainment.
 
I hope not. It's bad enough you saying you hate our players, but then you bump one for Delfouneso (who missed an open goal from 3 yards out) yet say that Macheda won't make it and slate his overall play when he was probably the best player on the pitch today.

I like reading your posts datura, and cannot reply to them in the reserve forum, but I believe you must see also that Delfouneso was very good today.

Macheda was effective, but Delfouneso was effective plus quality. He never gave the ball away once. Sharper, quicker - he is super quick - and more clever. I don't think Macheda is a special player, and neither is Welbeck. It is very hard for some people to accept that they are not going to be our future. What will happen, that once they see more and more of them, they will start to believe what I am seeing and eventually give up. I am a big fan of William Keane, and alot of our other young players, but Macheda, no.
 
Nope, sounds like he's saying something quite similar to what you said Rubberman..

You're kidding right? I never gave Campbell this type of praise below:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronaldo No.9
Better than Pato then Scholesy? You know the one you called a headless chicken

Scholesy said:
I would take Delfouneso over Pato. So yes.


You two should add each other on facebook and discuss your favourite footballers, and their techniques.
I suggest you add him first. You are clearly as confused as he is. I've never been obsessed with technique and Campbell has never been my favorite footballer.