EdWeatherall
TFD
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2006
- Messages
- 14,838
Surprising that there has been no fresh bid since last Friday/Saturday, been a very quiet week with regards to Modric
Really? So what about:
* A 5 year contract
* No need to sell in financial terms
* A line in the sand drawn by Levy in the most public terms possible.
I covered all of those points, if you actually read the post you'd see the "the only thing that Spurs have going for them" bit is purely in relation to the the 3 factors I listed separately that would define the value of the transfer relative to the value of the Torres and Rooney transfers. I even explained it point by point, how have you managed to be so monumentally wrong about something so obvious?All three are proven internationals, had reasonable length of time left on their contract, wanted out and belong to teams reluctant to sell, all around the same age.
Do you honestly think Modric is a better player than Rooney or Torres or Spurs are a bigger club than Man Utd or Liverpool? If you don't then you can understand why it's likely Modric would go for less than either of those two?This means the relative fee is determined by the need of the buying club, the ability of the player and the strength of the selling club.
I'd say you've (for the third time in one post no less) spectacularly missed the point, I mentioned £35m purely because someone else had further up, my original post suggested £40m as fair in the current market for instance.You say: "£35m for someone at their peak like Modric really isn't massive".
I say: 35m?Jog on.
The real point, one that you so spectacularly miss is this: Levy doesn't give a flying feck what is supposedly a "fair" price in this instance.... I'd say you've ... spectacularly missed the point, ... my original post suggested £40m as fair in the current market for instance.
The real point, one that you so spectacularly miss is this: Levy doesn't give a flying feck what is supposedly a "fair" price in this instance.
He doesn't wish to sell, doesn't need to sell and has has pretty much staked his all on not selling.
40m is just pissing in the wind ...
The real point, one that you so spectacularly miss is this: Levy doesn't give a flying feck what is supposedly a "fair" price in this instance.
He doesn't wish to sell, doesn't need to sell and has has pretty much staked his all on not selling.
40m is just pissing in the wind ...
I've already said: IMO 50m would be the minimum starting point for negotiations.A hypothetical situation....if spurs were open to bids what according to you would be the "right price" for modric ?
I've already said: IMO 50m would be the minimum starting point for negotiations.
Curious then, that so far only 4 caftards have taken up my bet offer ... care to join their ranks?... if Fernando Torres can force a move from Liverpool then Levy has no chance of keeping Modric.
The real point, one that you so spectacularly miss is this: Levy doesn't give a flying feck what is supposedly a "fair" price in this instance.
....
I've already said: IMO 50m would be the minimum starting point for negotiations.
I've already said: IMO 50m would be the minimum starting point for negotiations.
Yes.In this instance?
Simply that Modric will still be playing for Spurs this coming season, regardless of how much is bid for him and regardless of which club may bid.Whats the bet? I might take you up
Simply that Modric will still be playing for Spurs this coming season, regardless how much is bid for him and regardless of which club may bid.
okok you're on. £10.
Unllike Levy with Modric, I haven't heard Wenger or the chairman of Arsenal unconditionally promising not to sell Fabregas this summer - have you?Glaston has completely lost it.
Barca are trying to sign Fabregas for under £30m but apparently the minimum starting point for negotiations over Modric is £50m.
I mean that after the close of this summer's transfer window Modric will still be a Spurs player.Ok you're on. £10.
Wait...by coming season you mean from the first fixture of the PL, or pre-season?
I mean that after the close of this summer's transfer window Modric will still be a Spurs player.
You're the 5th.Ok, I'm on then.
How many others have you bet against?
What do you mean?... As for the bet, I'm hardly going to share personal details with someone to collect a tenner am I?
Yes.
The instance being that Modric is the key player at Spurs, that he was arguably the best CM in the Prem last season, that Spurs have no financial need to sell, that Spurs have high ambitions of their own and that Levy has publicly pledged not to sell (and I quote) "at any price".
That's a lot of "instance" IMO ... don't you agree?
What do you mean?
You'd only have to supply your home address, full name, date of birth, National Insurance and Passport numbers, bank account sort-code and account number, plus credit and debit card numbers, expiry dates and security codes ....
That's not much to ask is it?
You're the 5th.
There's a well known scam whereby a fella offers a bet and convinces a bunch of different people in a pub to take him on for relatively small stakes; say he gets twenty people to bet against him at £5. If he then goes on to lose the bet, he fecks off sharpish without paying the £100 he owes; sneaks off, runs, jumps in a car or whatever, never to be seen again. If he wins the bet however, even if 50% of the crowd (already populated by likely more honest types than the scammer himself) welsh on him, he still collects the £50 from the ten who think that fair is fair and pay what they owe.
This particular scam translates beautifully into an online situation; the scammer needn't ever worry about having to make any sharp getaways; with no risk to himself whatsoever, if he loses he simply logs off. Play your cards right, talk the talk, and you might get 1,000 people or more across one, or perhaps even a series of message-boards to make a £10 bet with you, and though you'd never have any intention of paying a penny, win the bet and that'd be 1,000 e-suckers out there who might potentially paypal you £10.
The beauty is, if you make your money, nobody has any clue that he/she was the victim of a scam, and if the bet is lost and you disappear into the cyber-wastes, the most that will happen is that a load of people who don't even know you think you're a twat.
I'm not saying that that's what Glaston's up to, in all likelihood he's honest and straight-up, I'm just saying that, well, that's what he'd want you to think, wouldn't he?
Yea, I'd be weary about going into bets with anyone on a forum, especially Glaston. It's not like he misses out on much by fecking off forever, seeing as this is a Man United forum and he spends most of his time here being laughed at.
You have a very strange way of looking at wagers.