Are you serious?
Aaron Ramsey
- Thread starter Partizan
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Are you serious?
You mean you have no better answer because you realise your self-contradictions are making you look totally stupid. Unfortunately for you, I understand your words better than you do yourself.
No champion, i spelt it out exaclty what I meant. Your story of granny driving shawcross was fecken stupid.
No it wasn't and no it wasn't even a granny simile. It's just that you tried to change it to have no resemblance to the fact of what actually happened. I can't help it if you're struggling with simple concepts.
With Gallas in mind, would you answer me the following simple question. I'm sure even you will understand the words as I'm keeping them simple for you.
Which is worse:
A. A player going for a 50-50 ball who is a fraction slower than the opponent and catches him.
B. A player who deliberately targets high up on an opponent's leg with his studs well after the ball is played.
Just answer A or B please.
Perhaps the rules should be changed so Arsenal players don't have to face these incredibly nasty tackles by men that are just horrible meanies.
That's exactly he did in that recent incident where Arsenal didn't even get a free kick against them (and if my memory serves me right led to an Arsenal goal). By the way, resorting to personal insults is a sure way of showing that you know your argument is wrong.
So its settled, a rule stating Arsenal will play Liverpool every week next season. Excellent, always wanted a perfect 38-0-0 record.
No its not, take a look at at the video, Davies slides in to get the ball and Gallas' foot is exactly where the ball was. So perhaps its your lack of facts that proves you are, in fact, wrong.
You talk of personal insults when your whole previous post was an attempt at a personal insult.
Er...righto.
Now who has no argument eh?
Alright you win - fast is slow, slow is fast, ban people who dare get to the ball before an Arsenal player, ban people who get to the ball after an Arsenal player, ban accidents, praise malicious fouls.
You're trying to bring me down to your level and I'm going to quit now before I get there.
yeah sorry just letting off steam.
That's what he said I think?
Although on a search the report on SSN that the ref wouldn't have seem to have come from some manipulated quotes.
DELAP: REF SWAYED BY INJURY NOT TACKLE - mirror.co.uk
Hmmmmmm.
I'm probably wrong, but the ref certainly didn't think he intended it and clearly wouldn't have sent him off if it wasn't for the injury.
Alright you win - fast is slow, slow is fast, ban people who dare get to the ball before an Arsenal player, ban people who get to the ball after an Arsenal player, ban accidents, praise malicious fouls.
You're trying to bring me down to your level and I'm going to quit now before I get there.
Seriously, can you get quotes in my posts where i say fast is slow and slow is fast, ban people who dare get to the ball before an Arsenal player and ban people who get to the ball after an Arsenal player. Also find where i said Gallas' challenge wasn't a foul.
Then i might start taking you seriously.
That does not matter. Nani got sent off the exact same or less worse tackle than that on Villa Park and he even got the ball first which Gallas did not. You can not lunge in like that with studs showing even if you are trying to go for the ball.
Regardless I have no idea how everyone is making sure shot judgments on this incident. With the video or pics going around it is impossible to tell how high the tackle was, only thing clear is that he went in with lot of force.
And that is all i've said on the incident.
It honestly looks like Gallas has no idea Davies is about to nick the ball from under him, not that it makes it any better, its still studs on the ankle.
Does Wenger still hold the record for most red cards in the Premiership?
He'd be close this season with a total of 0.
As in because Gallas and Davies aren't coming heads on... of course i have a loop hole.
That wasn't the question though. When he first turned up players like Winterburn, Adams, Bould and Viera were quite capable of giving it back, with this team you won trophies, lots of them, and I don't remember any whining about hard tackles.
Watching the highlights of the game, the ref called for a foul and looked to be getting on with the game without thinking too much about the challenge. Once he saw the extent of the injury, he showed the red card.
Jesus the true colors are out.
nothing wrong with getting up in them. until they can prove to handle it why shouldn't they be hit physically? this isn't fecking la liga.
teams don't try to man handle us and chelsea even though we can dominate possession essentially as well as arsenal at times...that's because chelsea and us can handle the tackles. if we go soft and teams get up in amongst us, then i will blame us for going soft not for teams to be overly physical. the premiership is a fecking long war out there, no quarter given. either you handle it or you can feck off.
im a bit suprised that peterstorey is making this much of an issue about physical play when he chooses to name himself after one of english football's all time so-called 'hard men'.
The Gallas tackle is the worst I've seen from any player this season.
Basically, Wenger needs to shut his mouth and grow the feck up. Perhaps if he did your team might actually stand a chance of doing the same?
That's what manslaughter means. It's killing someone with no intent and it being and accident. Otherwise it'll be murder of a certain degree.
Doesn't matter how fast you're going either.
The clear difference being this is a football game, not a court of law. Poor analogy.
What are Aaron Ramsey's Arsenal comeback chances? Sportsmail looks at the stars who played again after horrific leg breaks | Mail Online
None of those players came back better bar Carragher and if you look at Anderson he had to change his play completely in comparison to how we see him in those early vids with Porto and Gremio
None of those players came back better bar Carragher and if you look at Anderson he had to change his play completely in comparison to how we see him in those early vids with Porto and Gremio
Anyone remember - I think Nasri - attempting to break Nani?
Hypocrisy is a terrible thing.
Hypocrisy is a terrible thing.
Has Nani got a broken leg? Well shut the feck up then.
So what you're saying is these situations should be judged on the outcome, rather than the intent or the action itself?
If you're speeding you get fined, if you're speeding and hurt someone it's much more serious. Unlucky? Yes. Unfair? Maybe. If it's good enough to be law of the land.........
That said the Arsenal supporters seem to have lost the plot and are acting like kids.
That said the Arsenal supporters seem to have lost the plot and are acting like kids.
Exactly, it's ridiculous. If someone goes in badly on someone then it should be punished regardless of the outcome. If we have to wait for a broken leg to start dishing out severe punishment then something is seriously wrong.
The fact is Nasri's challenge was intentionally much worse than Shawcross, as Nasri evidently didn't care whether he got the ball or not, he just wanted to stop Nani at any cost.
gooners will be expecting a minutes's silence this weekend for Ramsey.
Well you could shut it right now if that's all you've got to say.