As I said, they live in the real world.
Now you are getting it. Now what part of that constitutes Berbatov, or his agent setting his wages, as you implied?
His performances.
Surely you can do better than a "story" by an anonymous reporter with no quotes?
It's funny that Berbatov fans were ecstatic when rumors were flying around of a new contract for him early last year, but when one was never agreed, you now want proof that it was happening.
Except he isn't rotting on the bench. Your Bridge comparison is fecking retarded.
Berbatov has hardly played this season, mostly because he's been sitting on the bench. I'd say he's being wasted away.
And he has done that, as much as it annoys you.
It annoys me that he's not first choice when it's beyond clear he can be so good. I would like nothing more then for him to turn a corner and become the player everybody hoped he would be for United.
That is just factually incorrect.
Berbatov has started 3 premier league games this season. Thats not rotation, that's being benched because there are 3 better options.
As I said, we regularly rotate our strikers. But you already know that. It's not just limited to our strikers, either. We rotate all of our squad. Yet I don't see you bitching about their wage packets when they are on the bench.
Most of our bench players are hardly as talented as Berbatov.
Again, factually incorrect. Berbatov really drives you around the bend. It's embarrassing, because you are usually quite normal.
How is it incorrect? He scored 23 goals in each season at spurs. He's only just this year bettered that record. He's also failed to improve as a player at United.