From their BBC bias against City thread, same guy:
Last edited:
Bluemoon goes into Meltdown
- Thread starter Logan!
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
Jaysus, talk about having nothing productive to do.
what an absolute dickheadThats unbelievable...
I like how he wrote 'many thanks and kind regard' after 'fob off' though
That's past delusion. He's the sort of person the police find dead in his flat, with writing smeared on the wall in shit.
"But you didn't respond to the footnote on page 196 of my letter!"
Reply from a poster named Sheikh Khalid something.
Did you use my post to edit the quote tags? Because I got a notification. I feel used and abused.
Forever in our shadow.
Best thing about city is the chicken bati pies at half time. That's it. Full stop
Best thing about city is the chicken bati pies at half time. That's it. Full stop
Reply from a poster named Sheikh Khalid something.
Imagine being that bothered about something like that. Jesus.
Don't know what you're talking about or where you got that from?
The stuff about BBC not mentioning Martial's fee is just wrong. Him and United got hammered by the press, BBC significantly included, about the fee paid for him. He was getting written off by everyone before he'd even kicked a ball in a red shirt, all because of the fee.
Just do a quick search for his name at the top of the BBC Sport page, pull up any article relating to him or a match report in which he scored a goal, and there it is.
"The France international became the world's most expensive teenage player when he signed from Monaco in September for £36m, which could rise to £58m" is pasted on to almost every single one.
I struggle to find one that doesn't at least mention the £36m. I actually can't find one. Same goes for Memphis. The fee quoted is still £31m, because the BBC don't know the difference between GPB and Euros, and it's mentioned on every article about him.
The BBC has never written "21 year old Martial", because he isn't 21. Fanny.
Just do a quick search for his name at the top of the BBC Sport page, pull up any article relating to him or a match report in which he scored a goal, and there it is.
"The France international became the world's most expensive teenage player when he signed from Monaco in September for £36m, which could rise to £58m" is pasted on to almost every single one.
I struggle to find one that doesn't at least mention the £36m. I actually can't find one. Same goes for Memphis. The fee quoted is still £31m, because the BBC don't know the difference between GPB and Euros, and it's mentioned on every article about him.
The BBC has never written "21 year old Martial", because he isn't 21. Fanny.
I guess that noob has never read the myriad of articles stating that United have spent anywhere between £250m and £300m on this squad.
Tin-foil hats for all!
Tin-foil hats for all!
You're making the mistake of attempting to rationalise the irrational thinking of your average, fevered, Bluemoon posting psychotic. Nothing that happens in the dark, rag infested corners and shadows of their paranoid minds is based in reality.
That's just weird that he has spent the time to do all that, I had to justify even writing in this thread before I did it.
Furthermore, the BBC will focus more on United because United are the team people want to read about; nobody gives a shit about City, no matter what they do.
Furthermore, the BBC will focus more on United because United are the team people want to read about; nobody gives a shit about City, no matter what they do.
what a clownOne of those "RIP to the other driver who died with Paul Walker that nobody cares about because he wasn't famous" nobs
@Barca84 nice to see even Barcelona fans know they're a pain in the arse.
But he isn't. His name is a reference to our European triumph against Barca in 1984.@Barca84 nice to see even Barcelona fans know they're a pain in the arse.
It's pretty obvious he is Catalan born and bred, Barca supporter for 84 years, going on 87 years, supported them since their inception in 1899, 116 years ago. But most probably hates every fibre of the club and wishes they conducted themselves with the same class and dignity as Real Madrid.
Whoosh.
It's hard to live in the shadow of United. Cannot blame them for going loco every now and again.
I like how he inserts Guardiola in the midst of Conte, Pardew and Allardyce
True. It's funny though, because as much as they go on about "the agenda" they sound utterly desperate to be hated and despised by everyone. They yearn for it. They want everyone to root against them, like everyone did against United in the 90s/00s. It just hasn't happened. The majority are just so indifferent towards City. A lot of neutrals even quite like them.
According to the leaked contract his fee was £27m and could rise to around £30m depending on clauses
https://footballleaks2015.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/psv-eindhoven-manchester-united-memphis-depay/
Thing is, City are a nothing club! They could win the next 10 titles and champions leagues and United would still grab the headlines. Because everybody knows City are a false club. The club and fans that were in the old Div 3 and must have had crowds of 100k (every City fan I know claims they were there back then) has long gone...they're footballs version of the Harlem Globetrotters who are living in a permanent world of bitterness. All that money and they still can't get it quite right.
The giveaway is the season that Liverpool fecked it up, a week after the season finished no one cared about who'd won the league. If the dippers had won the media would still be going on about it now.
City fans are just so anti-Utd that they can't understand that we are a huge news story, while they are a nothing club that won the lottery, nothoing more.
Even when they are winning titles, its us that sells papers and draws clicks.
Even when they are winning titles, its us that sells papers and draws clicks.
They probably would to be fair. A bit of thanks for us taking full advantage of Stevie G's timely slip, and therefore saving you from having to endure the media wankfest, wouldn't go amiss
I think it's a bit more stronger than that. I posted some poor guy who was attacked on his first post, which wasn't even contentious. I got banned after 2!!! How many United fans actually post on there, out of interest?? I think "the odd insult" is putting it mildly don't you think? There was even a gif zooming in on Fergie who's hands were shaking a bit. The comments were quite personal and insensitive.
You and Bobbymanc may be decent posters on there but the other fantastic posters you mention are definitely in the minority, from what I've seen. No mods challenging the posts whatsoever?
Rag cnut.
Outrageous from the BBC. No wonder City fans are in uproar.
Bluemoon suffers from a lack of newbie system regardless its a poor forum, I'm on Mancityfans.net much more calmer.
The site is moderated. Many have had bans (myself included) when we overstep the mark.
United posters who come in peace such as Viva Rivaldo, JM MCR, Jack and Falcao have had a good run on BM without abuse (a little legpulling maybe but I've had that on here).
There are plenty of numpties on the forum too but they are often just keyboard warrior kids or saddos letting off steam. Modern life's like that and BM mostly has a membership of Mancs with their peculiar philosophy on life and sense of humour. The ranters are not to be taken too seriously.