I Believe
everything Nigel Farage told me
why leave a union that protects its members
Because it can't and won 't be able to that's the fundamental point, inertia, incompetence, whatever, its an illusion!
why leave a union that protects its members
Because it can't and won 't be able to that's the fundamental point, inertia, incompetence, whatever, its an illusion!
That first line made me cringe, its another case of 'what suits me best is brilliant'. Were you living in europe during the change to the euro? It was the worst thing ever.The Euro was a fantastic innovation. I was ecstatic when it came into being, life became so much simpler, then we had borderless trading , oh joy! Until you've lived through the previous incarnation close up you don't appreciate it.
If what you say is true why are you so worried about Germany taking the strain.
We're back to who's going to lose the most - at least you've recognised that the Uk will lose more than the EU, now as I said before - the UK will lose over 50% of its customers if trade stops. So assuming that happens to maintain the same level it has to find double the customers it has left.
Now to give a few ideas of countries that supply the UK, I've already said that Germany is the top one with 7.6% so all it needs to do is replace the 7.6% with other customers.
France is 7.1%, Italy is 5.1%, Spain is 4.1% it's miniscule in comparison , that's all they have to replace the Uk trade with - how can a country survive a 50% loss of customers, if it was a company it would go bust overnight.
Your basket case southern economies could be dreamland if the Uk commits suicide.
I didn't say the Eurozone was the saviour of the pound, I said the Uk flourished for the most part while the Eurozone existed despite not being in the Euro and had done very well coming out of the crash..
So by you voting to leave, you have effectively voted for two options - 1 - not EU members but still want single market etc which in reality means you pay more but have no say which is exactly what you don't want - which leaves the second option which is a crash out of the EU and longterm severe economic damage, also which I presume you don't want
The point was the uk economy was not growing as quick as it should, the eu in recession was the reason suggested. I tend to agree.Sounds like before my time on here but if that was the case how were the Uk posting much better figures than the EU much more quickly. Which way will the figures go after the Uk leaves, I know where my money would be.
That first line made me cringe, its another case of 'what suits me best is brilliant'. Were you living in europe during the change to the euro? It was the worst thing ever.
That first line made me cringe, its another case of 'what suits me best is brilliant'. Were you living in europe during the change to the euro? It was the worst thing ever.
The point was the uk economy was not growing as quick as it should, the eu in recession was the reason suggested. I tend to agree.
I lived in the UK till 2007 - I'm talking about business - anyone who was trading in and out and around of Europe surely thought the same thing. 1st January 1999, we had our Euro accounts set up, before the cash came out. Consolidating containers in Holland, Belgium, France, Germany - all mixed up of products from countries all round Europe - no more buying or selling in loads of different currencies, goodbye Dutch guilders, Deutschmarks, French Francs, Belgian Francs , Austrian Schillings , Italian Lira - bloody brilliant.
Yes, but you realize that most of the population don't work in international trading, do you? Your peace of mind or easiness can mean nothing to some other people that they are not in that world. And I repeat, I am not against the euro. Is that you can't extrapolate your case or of the few ones as a beneficial for everyone
If the businesses in individual countries took advantage of fiddling the people that's another matter. Remember in international trading if you are buying something one day in French Francs and the next day it's in Euros you are not going to get conned by the people you are buying from by a sudden increase in price.
Same thing was said when the UK changed to decimal currency in 1971.
Other than international trading travelling between member states also makes life easy, you may say not everyone travels
If the businesses in individual countries took advantage of fiddling the people that's another matter. Remember in international trading if you are buying something one day in French Francs and the next day it's in Euros you are not going to get conned by the people you are buying from by a sudden increase in price.
Same thing was said when the UK changed to decimal currency in 1971.
Other than international trading travelling between member states also makes life easy, you may say not everyone travels
Baaah, me me me. Proper toryI lived in the UK till 2007 - I'm talking about business - anyone who was trading in and out and around of Europe surely thought the same thing. 1st January 1999, we had our Euro accounts set up, before the cash came out. Consolidating containers in Holland, Belgium, France, Germany - all mixed up of products from countries all round Europe - no more buying or selling in loads of different currencies, goodbye Dutch guilders, Deutschmarks, French Francs, Belgian Francs , Austrian Schillings , Italian Lira - bloody brilliant.
On the matter of the EU membership fee, it's worth noting that our net contribution has increased by 400% over the past decade or so. And with the recent austerity era as a guide, i think we can reasonably that bloated Brussels would ask for even more during future budgetary cycles. Perhaps £20-25bn annually before too long? Well let the integrationists pay for their own party.
Baaah, me me me. Proper tory
You can keep telling lies if it makes you happy - these are UK government figures
1995 it was £4.017bn as opposed to 8.616 bn last year - doubled in 21 years
Doubling in 21 years... What's that about 3% per year...You can keep telling lies if it makes you happy - these are UK government figures
1995 it was £4.017bn as opposed to 8.616 bn last year - doubled in 21 years
Courtesy of those racist Eurosceptics at the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/31/britain-eu-contribution-rise-quadruple-cameron
The continent was suffering through years of austerity but Brussels never acted in kind. Says a lot about the character of institution and the folks at the top there. We see it even with these so-called negotiations: Barnier's brief would seem to put the bullion before all else.
It would be nice if Labour could defend the interests of UK taxpayers on this one issue, however the point scoring comes first.
Many keep mentioning how 'mean Brussels' had mistreated the South European countries. Yet my country is the most Southern of all European countries and our economy had prospered.
I strongly believe that we should analyse the government's of individual states before criticising Brussels. I am not well versed about the 'statesmen' who governed Greece and Spain but I know a thing or two about the politicians in Italy. Just to make a quick list you had the pro mafia sympathiser Andreotti, the whoremonger Berlusconi (whose wealth came from thin wind), Renzi who backstabbed his precedessor Letta and who can't even string two sentences in English not to forget the former Communist leader Giorgio Napoletano who overstepped over his democratic rights as President to become a sort of king-maker in total desregard of democracy. Next election it will be fought between the whoremonger, an anti-immigration leader with zero tertiary education who believed that any non Northern Italy region is a burden, the backstabber with zero knowledge about the English language and a professional comedian.
Italy is a broken country working with a broken system were no one can really govern and were corruption is so rife that its almost impossible to become a medical consultant (what the italian call primario) without entering politics. Its an inefficient country sitting on a mountain of debt built through decades of incompetence and corruption. I spoke with loads of economists both in Italy and beyond and I assure you the Euro didn't ruin Italy it saved them. If it wasn't the Euro the Italian economy would have suffered a meltdown at least a decade ago.
That's straight out of Farage. You don't realise it but it's there, it works and have particular experience of how it works especially regards China - the Uk will be in trouble on its own.
My culture is somehow different to yours. We’re brought up in a society were criticism is not only common but it’s expected. People who love you will analyse you, they will find weaknesses in you (performance, character traits etc) and at least try and help you out by highlighting them up. That’s why I tend to go very tough in everything that I love (United, the UK etc). If you’re well versed in Italian culture you’ll understand that perfectly.I'm not sure you're selling the idea of political and financial union with such countries very well this morning devilish.![]()
The EU may work for some, it doesn't for others, at present it is incapable of serious reform from within because that will upset the 'gravy-train', that's why its flawed, that's why ultimately it will fail. The US (even under Trump) has a better chance of restraining China, than the EU does in the future. Britain has a better chance of dealing with China on its own, in the future, than within a monolithic organisation. I would say the one hope for the EU is that Britain leaving will spur Germany and France to take charge of the EU cut through the bickering and drive it forward towards full integration, full steam ahead, consolidate the euro zone, those countries still outside it either join or sit on the back steps, no stops, no u turns, no more treaty's, just go for it! however if it doesn't do it soon, it will have no hope of catching China
I take your point about future generations, however that's inevitable, our grandfathers etc. did what they thought was right and there would be many saying something different at that time, somethings worked, others didn't, there will always be an element of the "the sins of the fathers being visited on the sons", we can only do what we think is right. Essentially most remainers saw Brexit in purely economic terms, most leavers in differing forms of political solutions.
One of the things that convinced me to vote leave was if you live in a large metropolitan area/city in Britain, there is a 'remainer' instinct, our large cities are becoming almost like the medieval castles of old, inside them you have a relative degree of prosperity, outside them you are almost in a wasteland. Wander down any high street in a small to medium size town and look at what has happened to it, shops closed, business gone under, or given in to the out of town malls. OK you will say that's progress, nothing to do with the EU, but if you live in one of these towns, it sure don't feel like it and the EU hasn't done much to alleviate the problems. Even when EU monies (which are our own to start with) come back in Project Form, most are 'window dressing' at best, forlorn attempts at covering the economic scars, giving temporary assistance at best, keeping people like me (for a time anyway) employed in managing the projects, but in truth, whilst achieving the objectives (otherwise you didn't get the money) but making little difference. The most important project that I felt really did have an impact was the first one I worked on in the North West of England, it was designed to help businesses get familiar with IT, web site development, training for company staff, even some PC hardware given 'free'. That did make a difference, because it was the right project at the right time, in the right place, it was not just chasing a 'pot' of EU money, which unfortunately that's what many projects become, they call it inward investment! apart from the that one project, I'd call inward waste.
I suppose we all relate to our own experiences, if your experience of the EU is positive then of course you want to remain within it, since you are already there, so to speak, then you need not worry about the rest of us... and I'm not accusing you of being selfish!
Ireland certainly does!No other major industrialised country in the West of Europe or North American etc seems to have a city with such a stranglehold on the economy.
I think this is one of the more frustrating arguments for me about Brexit.
Many places across the country have not benefitted from the boom of the last 30 years (and obviously, the people living there may not have either). We are a country that is heavily focused on the South East and especially our behemoth, Alpha ++ city, London, which sucks the life out of many parts of the UK. No other major industrialised country in the West of Europe or North American etc seems to have a city with such a stranglehold on the economy.
What I am struggling to understand is how this is the EU's fault? Despite hysteria and hyperbole about Frau Merkel, Brussels, the German-French axis, yada yada, our government is in charge of our economy. We can decide to try to redistribute the wealth to other parts of the country. We can implement infrastructure projects or try to attract business to Sheffield, Manchester, Newcastle etc. Yet so much of our priority seems to be London and the EU. Hell, it seems our vaunted politicians are struggling to even comprehend the idea of moving out of parliament to another city for a few years to save money and time while renovating the palaces of westminster.
Our national stadium is in London. We now play semi finals in that London stadium.
That is all us. Nobody forces us to do that.
Do you think that leaving the EU will suddenly cause a seismic shift in our politicians' thinking and get them to develop the rest of the UK?
I think this is one of the more frustrating arguments for me about Brexit.
Many places across the country have not benefitted from the boom of the last 30 years (and obviously, the people living there may not have either). We are a country that is heavily focused on the South East and especially our behemoth, Alpha ++ city, London, which sucks the life out of many parts of the UK. No other major industrialised country in the West of Europe or North American etc seems to have a city with such a stranglehold on the economy.
What I am struggling to understand is how this is the EU's fault? Despite hysteria and hyperbole about Frau Merkel, Brussels, the German-French axis, yada yada, our government is in charge of our economy. We can decide to try to redistribute the wealth to other parts of the country. We can implement infrastructure projects or try to attract business to Sheffield, Manchester, Newcastle etc. Yet so much of our priority seems to be London and the EU. Hell, it seems our vaunted politicians are struggling to even comprehend the idea of moving out of parliament to another city for a few years to save money and time while renovating the palaces of westminster.
Our national stadium is in London. We now play semi finals in that London stadium.
That is all us. Nobody forces us to do that.
Do you think that leaving the EU will suddenly cause a seismic shift in our politicians' thinking and get them to develop the rest of the UK?
I think this is one of the more frustrating arguments for me about Brexit.
Many places across the country have not benefitted from the boom of the last 30 years (and obviously, the people living there may not have either). We are a country that is heavily focused on the South East and especially our behemoth, Alpha ++ city, London, which sucks the life out of many parts of the UK. No other major industrialised country in the West of Europe or North American etc seems to have a city with such a stranglehold on the economy.
What I am struggling to understand is how this is the EU's fault? Despite hysteria and hyperbole about Frau Merkel, Brussels, the German-French axis, yada yada, our government is in charge of our economy. We can decide to try to redistribute the wealth to other parts of the country. We can implement infrastructure projects or try to attract business to Sheffield, Manchester, Newcastle etc. Yet so much of our priority seems to be London and the EU. Hell, it seems our vaunted politicians are struggling to even comprehend the idea of moving out of parliament to another city for a few years to save money and time while renovating the palaces of westminster.
Our national stadium is in London. We now play semi finals in that London stadium.
That is all us. Nobody forces us to do that.
Do you think that leaving the EU will suddenly cause a seismic shift in our politicians' thinking and get them to develop the rest of the UK?
Ireland certainly does!
But I agree with your sentiment. We're massively reliant on Dublin for our $$$ here, so much so that it's only one of two counties (out of 26) that actually makes our Government money, and it's all our own doing, not the EU at all. Dublin has long been the centerpiece to all our transport & infrastructure upgrades, national stadiums/museums/whatever and we are now incredibly reliant on it and it's inflated and threadbare housing market for our economy. The idea that the EU could somehow be responsible for it (in our case, and I'm sure in the UK's too) is quite laughable.
Also, surely Paris is a bit like London, too? It accounts for 25% of France's GDP or something bonkers. Then you've Eastern cities like Prague and Budapest which are similarly important to their countries. I don't think the UK and London is a "unique" situation, I just think it's the biggest example of an alpha city swallowing its countries economy in the western world, but there are quite a lot!
Good post. There is definitely a problem in the UK (although much of it is part of a broader trend of urbanisation and, in the West, deindustrialisation). Unfortunately, not only have Leave voters identified the wrong culprit, they also risk exacerbating the problem if Brexit results in a rupture with the big market on our doorstep.
Yep, and the response is:
feck it, lets leave a body that has funded work in those ignored area and put all out trust in a government that's actually responsible for this situation in the first place.
It's so, so odd.
Courtesy of those racist Eurosceptics at the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/31/britain-eu-contribution-rise-quadruple-cameron
The continent was suffering through years of austerity but Brussels never acted in kind. Says a lot about the character of institution and the folks at the top there. We see it even with these so-called negotiations: Barnier's brief would seem to put the bullion before all else.
It would be nice if Labour could defend the interests of UK taxpayers on this one issue, however the point scoring comes first.
Indeed. The EU isn't there to dictate how we should manage our economy and where we should redistribute money. People seem to have voted for a change in their circumstances thinking that anything would be better than what they have now (well, some people anyway). That is objectively incorrect.
And as you say, we risk exacerbating this by breaking completely with this rather convenient, massive market on our doorstep.
At least once we're out, we won't have such a convenient scapegoat. Right?![]()
Ah, you guys are right actually, I hadn't thought of Paris and Dublin for some reason (Well actually, I hadn't considered that Paris was as important the economy of France). I think I was slightly waylaid by what I'd consider doing on holiday. I enjoyed Montpellier for example as much as I ever have Paris but that obviously says very little how powerful economically both of those cities are. Partly also as London and New York are, I think, the only two Alpha ++ cities.
I think @MoskvaRed touches on a point that I was thinking about as well. Which is that the West (tbh the world as a whole) is urbanising and that populations and money are concentrating around these big urban centres. That is the unfortunate reality in which we now have to live.
Can Liverpool become a major world port again? Sheffield a centre of steel and industry? I don't know but I doubt it. And I don't think Brexit is going to do those things.
The EU may work for some, it doesn't for others, at present it is incapable of serious reform from within because that will upset the 'gravy-train', that's why its flawed, that's why ultimately it will fail. The US (even under Trump) has a better chance of restraining China, than the EU does in the future. Britain has a better chance of dealing with China on its own, in the future, than within a monolithic organisation. I would say the one hope for the EU is that Britain leaving will spur Germany and France to take charge of the EU cut through the bickering and drive it forward towards full integration, full steam ahead, consolidate the euro zone, those countries still outside it either join or sit on the back steps, no stops, no u turns, no more treaty's, just go for it! however if it doesn't do it soon, it will have no hope of catching China
I take your point about future generations, however that's inevitable, our grandfathers etc. did what they thought was right and there would be many saying something different at that time, somethings worked, others didn't, there will always be an element of the "the sins of the fathers being visited on the sons", we can only do what we think is right. Essentially most remainers saw Brexit in purely economic terms, most leavers in differing forms of political solutions.
One of the things that convinced me to vote leave was if you live in a large metropolitan area/city in Britain, there is a 'remainer' instinct, our large cities are becoming almost like the medieval castles of old, inside them you have a relative degree of prosperity, outside them you are almost in a wasteland. Wander down any high street in a small to medium size town and look at what has happened to it, shops closed, business gone under, or given in to the out of town malls. OK you will say that's progress, nothing to do with the EU, but if you live in one of these towns, it sure don't feel like it and the EU hasn't done much to alleviate the problems. Even when EU monies (which are our own to start with) come back in Project Form, most are 'window dressing' at best, forlorn attempts at covering the economic scars, giving temporary assistance at best, keeping people like me (for a time anyway) employed in managing the projects, but in truth, whilst achieving the objectives (otherwise you didn't get the money) but making little difference. The most important project that I felt really did have an impact was the first one I worked on in the North West of England, it was designed to help businesses get familiar with IT, web site development, training for company staff, even some PC hardware given 'free'. That did make a difference, because it was the right project at the right time, in the right place, it was not just chasing a 'pot' of EU money, which unfortunately that's what many projects become, they call it inward investment! apart from the that one project, I'd call inward waste.
I suppose we all relate to our own experiences, if your experience of the EU is positive then of course you want to remain within it, since you are already there, so to speak, then you need not worry about the rest of us... and I'm not accusing you of being selfish!
Yes cos its a tax haven. 5% corporation tax pfff. Wait till the uk becomes one and prospers in the same way, then you can sing its praises from the roof tops.Yet my country is the most Southern of all European countries and our economy had prospered.
Yes cos its a tax haven. 5% corporation tax pfff. Wait till the uk becomes one and prospers in the same way, then you can sing its praises from the roof tops.
if a country with 65.6m people and the budget the UK has somehow manages to become a tax haven then I'll eat my hat.Yes cos its a tax haven. 5% corporation tax pfff. Wait till the uk becomes one and prospers in the same way, then you can sing its praises from the roof tops.